Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:01:39.087Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Cost of the Swedish Handicap Service System: Implications for Technology Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Dick Jonsson
Affiliation:
University of Linköping, Sweden
Ursula Hass
Affiliation:
University of Linköping, Sweden
Jan Persson
Affiliation:
University of Linköping, Sweden

Abstarct

The total cost of the Swedish handicap system is estimated at US $ 10.7 billion for 1989. The cost is distributed across different authorities with separate legal and financial responsibility. The concept of technology must be extended to include consideration of both the resources spent and benefits gained in the public sector and the magnitude and distribution of transfer payments from social insurance to fulfill its function in handicap policy decision making.

Type
Special Section: Technology and Disability
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Disability Commission 1989. Handicap welfare justice: Government commission report, SOU. Stockholm: Allmänna Förlaget, 1990, 14.Google Scholar
2.Disability Commission 1989. Handicap and welfare: Government commission report, SOU. Stockholm: Allmanna Förlaget, 1991. 46.Google Scholar
3.Hansson, I.Marginal costs of public funds for different tax instruments and government expenditures. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 1984, 86, 115–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Hass, U., Jonsson, D., & Persson, J.Welfare consequences of the Swedish handicap service system and implications to technology assessment. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare, 1994, 3. 6165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Johnston, M. W., & Keith, R. A.Cost-benefit of medical rehabilitation: Review and critique. Archives of Physical and Medicine Rehabilitation, 1983, 64, 147–54.Google ScholarPubMed
6.Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress. Assessing the efficacy and safety of medical technologies. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1978.Google Scholar
7.Rosenthal, G. Anticipating the costs and benefits of new technology: A typology for policy. In Altman, S. H. & Blandon, R. (eds.) Medical technology: The culprit behind health care costs? Proceedings of the 1977 Sun Valley Forum on National Health, DHEW pub no (PHS) 79–3216. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1977.Google Scholar
8.Thomas, L.Notes of a biology-watcher: The technology of medicine. New England Journal of Medicine, 1971, 24, 1366–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar