Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T11:46:47.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Assessing Technology for Rehabilitation

Three Cases and Three Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Stan N. Finkelstein ,
John Hutton  and
Jan Persson
Stan N. Finkelstein
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
John Hutton
Affiliation:
University of York
Jan Persson
Affiliation:
Linköping University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The rehabilitation field has not always been regarded as the most glamorous or commercially promising section of medical care. But changing attitudes and demographics in many industrial countries have led to increased recognition of opportunity to provide services for individuals with disabilities and those in need of chronic care. As hospitals are under increasing pressure to offer rehabilitation services, this article focuses on three different technologies developed in three different countries, Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the United States.

Type
Special Section: The Organization and Use of Technology in the Hospital Part II: Case Studies
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , July 1987 , pp. 375 - 385
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Berge, A. R.The role of the user in the provision of technical aids for handicapped persons. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 1985, 23, Supplement, Pt. 1.Google Scholar
2.Lymark, H.The poor utilisation of R&D trends and results in the field of orthotics and prosthetics. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing, 1985, 23, Supplement, Pt. 1.Google Scholar
3.Maynard, A., & Bosanquet, N.Public expenditure on the NHS. London: IHSM, 1986.Google Scholar
4.Moskowitz, J., et al. Biomedical Innovation: The Challenge and the Process. In Roberts, E. B. et al. Biomedical innovation. Boston: MIT Press, 1981.Google Scholar
5.Shepard, D. C., & Karan, S. L.The market for wheelchairs: Innovations and federal policy. Office of Technology Assessment, Health Technology Case Study 30. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1984.Google Scholar
6.Tanenbaum, S. J.Engineering disability: Public policy and compensatory technology. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1986.Google Scholar
7.Thomas, L.The technology of medicine. In Notes of a biology watcher. New England Journal of Medicine, 1971, 1366–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8.Williams, A.The economics of coronary artery bypass grafting, British Medical Journal, 06 3, 1985, 291.Google ScholarPubMed