Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T16:44:21.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Adoption of Medical Technology: The Hospital's Three Decision Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

Ann Lennarson Greer
Ann Lennarson Greer
Affiliation:
University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
General Essays
Information
International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care , Volume 1 , Issue 3 , July 1985 , pp. 669 - 680
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Becker, M. H.Sociometric location and innovativeness: Reformulation and extension of the diffusion model. American Sociological Review, 1970, 35, 267–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Coleman, J. S., Katz, E., & Menzel, H.Medical innovation: A diffusion study, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1966.Google Scholar
3.Cromwell, J., Ginsburg, P., Hamilton, D., & Summer, M.Incentives and decisions underlying hospitals' adoption of major capital equipment. Report to the National Center for Health Services Research, Contract #HSM–110–73–513, Cambridge, MA: Abt Associates, 1975.Google Scholar
4.Daft, R. L., & Becker, S. W. 1978. Innovation in organizations. New York: Elsevier, 1978.Google Scholar
5.Downs, G. W. Jr, & Mohr, L. B.Conceptual Issues in the Study of Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1976, 21, 700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Freidson, E.Profession of medicine: A study of the sociology of applied knowledge, New York: Harper & Row, 1970.Google Scholar
7.Freidson, E. Speculations on the social psychology of local PSRO operations. In Greer, S., (ed.), Conference proceedings: Conference on Professional Self Regulation, DHEW Publication No. (HRA) 77–621. Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1975.Google Scholar
8.Greer, A. L.Advances in the study of diffusion and innovation in health care organizations. Health and Society!Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1977a, 55, 505–632.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9.Greer, A. L. & Zakhar, A.Hospital adoption of medical technology: A preliminary investigation into hospital decision-making. Report to the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Legislation, Health Resources Administration, Department of Health, Educational and Welfare, 1977b.Google Scholar
10.Greer, A. L.Medical technology and professional dominance theory. Social Science and Medicine, 1984a, 18.Google ScholarPubMed
11.Greer, A. L. Medical conservatism and technological acquisitiveness: The paradox of hospital technology adoptions. In Roth, J. A., & Ruzek, S. B. (eds.), The social impact of medical technology, vol. 4: Research in the Sociology of Health Care. JAI Press, 1984b,Google Scholar
12.Greer, A. L., Greer, S., & Meyer, A.Diffusion of medical technology to community hospitals: An institutional analysis. Report to the National Center for Health Services Research, 1983.Google Scholar
13.Greer, S., & Greer, A. L.The hospital board, the hospital mission and the adoption of new technology. Milwaukee, Wisconsin: Urban Research Center, 1984.Google Scholar
14.Greer, S. A.Citizens voluntary governing boards: Waiting for the quorum, Policy Sciences, 1982, 14, 165–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Kaluzny, A. D., Veney, J. E., & Gentry, J. T., 1974. Innovation in health services: A comparative study of hospitals and health departments. Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly, 1974, 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
16.Lee, M. L.A conspicuous production theory of hospital behavior, Southern Economic Journal, 1971, 38, 48–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Office of Technology Assessment. Medical technology under proposals to increase competition in health care. Washington, DC: Office of Technology Assessment, U.S. Congress, 1982.Google Scholar
18.Perrow, C. Goals and power structures: A historical case study. In Freidson, E. (ed.), The Hospital in Modern Society. New York: The Free Press, 1963.Google Scholar
19.Perrow, C.Organizational analysis: A sociological view. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing, 1970.Google Scholar
20.Rogers, E. M., & Shoemaker, F.Communication of innocations: A cross cultural approach. New York: Free Press, 1971.Google Scholar
21.Roos, N. P.Influencing the health care system: Policy alternative, Public Policy, 1974, 22, 162–67.Google Scholar
22.Rosenthal, G. Anticipating the costs and benefits of new technology: A typology for policy. In Altman, S. & Blendon, R., (eds.), Medical technology: The culprit behind health care costs. DHEW Publication No. (PHS) 79–3216, Washington, D.C.: GPO, 1979.Google Scholar
23.Russell, L. B.Medical advances and their diffusion. Washington DC: The Brookings Institute, 1979.Google Scholar
24.Sager, A. The reconfiguration of urban hospital care: 1937–1980. In Greer, A. L., & Greer, S. A. (eds.), Health and the city, Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, vol. 25. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications, 1983.Google Scholar
25.Saltman, R. B., & Young, D. W.The hospital power equilibrium: An alternative view of the cost containment dilemma. Journal of Health, Politics, Policy and Law, 1981, 6, 391–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26.Saltman, R. B., & Young, D. W.Hospital cost containment and the quest for institutional growth: A behavioral analysis. Journal of Public Health Policy, 1983, 4, 313–34.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27.Scott, W. R. Professionals in hospitals: Technology and the organization of work. In Georgopoulos, B. S. (ed.), Organization Research on Health Institutions. Ann Arbor: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan, 1972,Google Scholar
28.Wagner, J. L., Krieger, M. J., Lee, R. H., Romeo, A. A., & Stassen, M., A study of the impact of reimbursement strategies on the diffusion of medical technologies, vol. 1, Final Report to HCFA. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute.Google Scholar
29.Warner, K. E.The need for some innovative concepts of innovation:, An examination of research on the diffusion of innovations, Policy Sciences, 1974, 5, 433–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar