Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T04:46:46.472Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Opposition to Change In Rural Libya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Omar I. Fathaly  and
Monte Palmer
Omar I. Fathaly
Affiliation:
Arab Institute of Development, Libya
Monte Palmer
Affiliation:
Florida State University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In the fall of 1969 the Libyan monarchy was overthrown by a group of young military officers headed by Mouamir Quadafi. In the months prior to the revolution the tribal-based Monarchy had found it difficult to cope with the stress of rapid social and economic change, and had found itself immobilized by the conflict between Libya's traditional tribal and religious elite and a small but influential modernizing elite composed of students, technocrats and younger military officers. This new elite, a byproduct of Libya's oil wealth, had become particularly distressed by the arbitrariness and inefficiency of the Monarchy, the severe maldistribution of the oil revenues, and the existence of what they felt to be a poorly planned and managed development program which had largely failed to penetrate Libya's predominatly rural areas.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , April 1980 , pp. 247 - 261
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 El-Qathafi, Nu'ammar, Discourses, (Adam Publishers, 1975).Google Scholar

2 International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. The Economic Development of Libya, (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1960).Google ScholarWright, John, Libya, (New York: Frederick A. Praeger, Inc., Publishers, 1969).Google ScholarHayford, Elizabeth R., “The Politics of the Kingdom of Libya in Historical Perspective,” Unpublished dissertation, Tufts University, 1971.Google ScholarHasan, Salaheddin Salem, “The Genesis of the Political Leadership of Libya 1952–1969: Historical Origins and Development of its Component Elements,” Unpublished dissertation, The George Washington University, 1973.Google Scholar

3 Almond, Gabriel A. and Verba, Sidney, Civic Culture, (Boston: Little, Brown and Co., 1963).CrossRefGoogle ScholarParsons, Talcott, Structure of Social Action (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1949)Google ScholarSjorberg, Gideon, “The Rural-Urban Dimension in Preindustrial, Transitional, and Industrial So-cieties,” in Fans, Robert E. L., ed., Handbook of Modern Sociology (Chicago: Rand McNally, 1964), pp. 127–159.Google ScholarTonnies, Ferdinand, Community and Society Gemeinschaft and Geselschaft. Translated and edited by Loomis, C. P. (East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1957).Google ScholarWeber, Max, Theory of Social and Economic Organization, Translated by Henderson, A. M. and Parsons, Talcott and edited by Parsons, Talcott (Glencoe: The Free Press, 1947).Google Scholar

4 Sutton, F. X., “Social Theory and Comparative Politics,” in Eckstein, Harry and Apter, David E. (eds.), Comparative Politics (Glencoe, ill.: The Free Press, 1963), pp. 67–82.Google ScholarSjoberg, Gideon, “Folk and Feudal Societies,” American Journal of Sociology, 58 (11 1952), 231–39;CrossRefGoogle ScholarBeqiraj, Mehmet, Peasantry in Revolution (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1966).Google Scholar

5 Hagen, Everett E., On the Theory of Social Change (Homewood, Ill.: Dorsey Press, 1962), pp.68–69, 124–157.Google ScholarMcKinney, John C., Constructive Typology and Social Theory, (New York: Appleton-CenturyCrofts, 1966).Google ScholarJaguaribe, Halio, Political Development: A General Theory and a Latin American Case Study. (New York: Harper & Row, Publishers, 1973).Google Scholar

6 Rostow, W. W., The Process of Economic Growth (2nd ed.; New York: W. W. Norton & Co., 1952, 1962), p. 307. With permission of publisher.Google ScholarKahi, Joseph A., The Measurement of Modernism: A Study of Values in Brazil and Mexico, Latin American Monographs, No. 12 (Austin, Tex.: Institute of Latin American Studies, University of Texas, 1968);Google ScholarSmith, David Horton and Inkeles, Alex, “The OM scale: A Comparative Socio-Psychological Measure of Individual Modernity,” Sociometry, 29 (12 1966), 353–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Numerous examples of this situation can be found in Silvert, Kalman H. (ed.), Expectant Peoples (New York: Random House, 1963);Google ScholarNair, Kuswin, Blossoms in the Dust (London: C. Duckworth, 1961);Google ScholarDalton, George (ed.), Economic Development and Social Change: The Modernization of Village Communities (Garden City, N.Y.: The Natural History Press, 1971).Google ScholarHuntington, Samuel P., Political Order in Changing Societies (New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1963).Google Scholar

7 Rudolph, Lloyd I. and Rudolph, Susanne Hoeber, The Modernity of Tradition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1967).Google Scholar

8 Hawley, Willis D. and Wirt, Frederick M., (eds.), The Search for Community Power, (Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1968).Google ScholarAiken, Michael and Mott, Paul E., (eds.), The Structure of Community Power, New York: Random House, 1970.Google Scholar

9 Shaw, Marvin L. and Wright, Jack M., Scales for Measurement of Attitudes, (New York:McGraw-Hill Book Co., 1967).Google Scholar