No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Iysa A. Bello, The Medieval Controversy between Philosophy and Orthodoxy. Ijmāʿ and Taʾwīl in the Conflict between al-Ghazāl¯ and Ibn Rushd, Islamic Philosophy and Theology, Texts and Studies, ed. Daiber Hans, Volume III (Leiden: E. J. Brill, 1989). Pp. 188.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2009
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1990
References
NOTES
1 See S. Kogan, Barry, Averroës and the Metaphysics of Causation (Albany, N.Y., 1985),Google Scholar chap. 5, for a penetrating study of eternal divine creation, divine will, and divine causal knowledge. For an equally penetrating discussion of the Decisive Treatise and its structure, purpose and argument, see Mahdi, Muhsin, “Remarks on Averroës' Decisive Treatise,” in Michael, E. Marmura, ed., Islamic Theology and Philosophy, Studies in Honor of George F. Hourani (Albany, N.Y., 1984), pp. 188–202, 305–8. Bello lists in his bibliography both Mahdi's article and Kogan's dissertation; the latter was the basis for Averroës and the Metaphysics of Causation.Google Scholar
2 Mahdi, “Remarks,” p. 201.
3 Kogan, Cf., Averroës and the Metaphysics of Causation, pp. 221–29.Google Scholar