Published online by Cambridge University Press: 23 April 2009
A number of Arab countries have been exposed to structural adjustment programs. Under the guidance of the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund, these programs are aimed at making various kinds of Arab socialist and mixed-economy regimes more “market-friendly,” a policy that started in the 1950s and 1960s in countries like Algeria, Tunisia, Syria, and Egypt. Considering the mounting social tension that results from continuing population growth, urban agglomeration, and unemployment, it would be naive to expect—with Fukuyama—an “end of history” as most countries try to adopt market regimes and to strengthen civil society and parliamentary democracy. As Ibn Khaldun (1332–1406) well knew, economic and social change is a never-ending process. In the search for viable and sustainable strategies it may be stimulating to consider the insights of this great scholar of the Arab world who wrote 600 years ago.
IBN KHALDUN'S SOCIAL SYSTEMS THEORY
Ibn Khaldun was born in Tunis into an influential clan of South Arabian origin with substantial influence in Islamic Spain and, after the fall of Seville in 1248, in north-western Africa. He was exposed to the turmoils of his time. He held his first position in 1352 at the court at Tunis at the age of 20 and then went on to high political, administrative, diplomatic, and judicial posts in the service of various rulers in the Maghrib, Spain, and Egypt.
Author's note: This paper was presented at the Department of Near Eastern Studies, Princeton University, on 24 March 1994, while the author was John Foster Dulles Visiting Professor at the Woodrow Wilson School of Public and International Affairs.
1 Weiss, Dieter, Wirtschaftliche Entwicklungsplanung in der Vereinigten Arabischen Republik (Cologne-Opladen, 1964), 238 fCrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Fischel, Walter J., Ibn Khaldun in Egypt: His Public Functions and His Historical Research (1382–1406). A Study in Islamic Historiography (Berkeley, Calif., 1967), 15–19Google Scholar; idem, Ibn Khaldun and Tamerlane (Berkeley, Calif., 1952), 30 f.Google Scholar; Hitti, Philip K., History of the Arabs (London, 1949), 567–68Google Scholar; Cl. Huart, , Geschichte der Araber (Leipzig, 1915), 2:205Google Scholar. Khaldun, Ibn, The Muqaddimah, trans. Rosenthal, Franz (London, 1967) (hereafter cited as Ibn Khaldun/F. Rosenthal), 1:xxxiii f.Google Scholar; Issawi, Charles, An Arab Philosophy of History: Selections from the Prolegomena of Ibn Khaldun of Tunis (1332–1406) (London, 1950), 14 f.Google Scholar; Wesendonck, O. G. von, “Ibn Chaldun: Ein arabischer Kulturhistoriker des 14. Jahrhunderts,” Deutsche Rundschau 194 (1929): 46 fGoogle Scholar. See also Sorokin, Pitirim A., The Crisis of Our Age: The Social and Cultural Outlook (New York, 1946), 301Google Scholar; Bertalanffy, Ludwig von, General Systems Theory: Foundations, Development, Application (New York, 1968), 11Google Scholar.
3 Here and following, the numbers in parenthesis refer to the volume and the page in Rosenthal's translation of the Muqaddimah cited in n. 2.
4 Rosenthal, Erwin, “Ibn Khaldûns Gedanken üden Staat: Ein Beitrag zur Geschichte der mittelalterlichen Staatslehre,” Historische Zeitschrift 25 (1932): 1–2Google Scholar; Schimmel, Annemarie, Ibn Chaldun: Ausgewählte Abschnitte aus der Muqaddima (Tübingen, 1951), xviii, xix, 9, 37Google Scholar, translates ʿaṣabiyya as “Zusammengehörigkeitsgefühl”; Khaldun, Ibn/Rosenthal, , lxi, lxxviii f.Google Scholar, translates it as “group feeling”; Monteil, Vincent, Ibn Khaldûn, Discours sur I'histoire universelle. Al-Muqaddima. Tradition nouvelle (préface et notes) (Paris: Commission internationale pour la traduction des chefs d'oeuvre 1967–1968), 1:255Google Scholar, writes: “Ce terme, dont Ibn Khaldûn a assuré la fortune, peut ätre traduit, selon le contexte, par “esprit tribal, ou de clan; esprit de corps; tribalisme; consanguinité; liens du sang.” Schoen, Ulrich, Determination und Freiheit im arabischen Denken heute (Göttingen, 1976), 91Google Scholar, translates it as “Bewuβtsein, zu einer Gemeinschaft zu gehören … Clangeist.” Mahdi, Muhsin, Ibn Khaldun's Philosophy of History (London, 1957), 196Google Scholar, translates it as “communal ethos, community of sentiment, or social solidarity.” See also Alafenish, Salim, “Die Bedouinen in Ibn Khalduns Wissenschaft,” in Nomadismus—Ein Entwicklungsproblem? ed. Scholz, Fred and Janzen, Jörg (Berlin, 1982), 122–23Google Scholar; Simon, Heinrich, Ibn Khalduns Wissenschaft von der menschlichen Kultur (Leipzig, 1959), 48 fGoogle Scholar. Tibi, Bassam, Vom Gottesreich zum Nationalstaat: Islam und panarabischer Nationalismus (Frankfurt, 1987), 128Google Scholar; Hourani, Albert, Arabic Thought in the Liberal Age, 1798–1939 (London, 1962), 41, 52, 78Google Scholar; Al-Azmeh, Aziz, Ibn Khaldun in Modern Scholarship (London, 1991), 168–73Google Scholar; Höpp, Gerhard, “Ibn Haldun und die arabische Linke,” in Ibn Haldun und seine Zeit, ed. Sturm, Dieter (Halle, 1983), 54Google Scholar.
5 See also Ritter, Hellmut, “Irrational Solidarity Groups: A Socio-Psychological Study in Connection with Ibn Khaldun,” Oriens 1 (1948): 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
6 See, on monetary crises during Ibn Khaldun's times, Labib, Subhi Y., “Handelsgeschichte Ägyptens im Spätmittelalter (1171–1517),” Vierteljahresschrift für Sozial—und Wirtschaftsgeschichte 46 (1965): 266 fGoogle Scholar.
7 These recommendations contrast with those given by Malthus, Thomas Robert, Essay on the Principle of Population, 6th ed. (1798)Google Scholar, suggesting public health standards be deliberately lowered to fight population growth:
To act consistently, therefore, we should facilitate, instead of foolishly and vainly endeavouring to impede, the operations of nature in producing this mortality; and if we dread the too frequent visitation of the horrid form of famine, we should sedulously encourage the other forms of destruction, which we compel nature to use. Instead of recommending cleanliness to the poor, we should encourage contrary habits. In our lowns we should make the streets narrower, crowd more people into the houses, and court the return of the plague. In the country, we should build our villages near stagnant pools, and particularly encourage settlements in all marshy and unwholesome situations. But above all, we should reprobate specific remedies for ravaging diseases.
Cf. Oser, Jacob and Blanchfield, William C., The Evolution of Economic Thought (New York, 1975), 107–8Google Scholar. See on the history of pests and famine in the Middle East, Kremer, Alfred von, Kutturgeschichte des Orients unter den Chalifen (Aalen, 1966), 2:490 fGoogle Scholar; Dols, Michael W., The Black Death in the Middle East (Princeton, N.J., 1977), 13 fGoogle Scholar.
8 Boulakia, Jean David C., “Ibn Khaldun: A Fourteenth-Century Economist,” Journal of Political Economy 79 (1971): 1117Google Scholar. Andic, Fuat M. and Andic, Suphan, “An Exploration into Fiscal Sociology: Ibn Khaldun, Schumpeter, and Public Choice,” Finanzarchiv 3 (1985): 456–59Google Scholar.
9 Spengler, Joseph J., “Economic Thought of Islam: Ibn Khaldun,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 6 (1963–1964): 289 fGoogle Scholar.
10 Cf. Daghistani, Abdulaziz I., “The Race of Development: Egypt vs. Others,” L'Egypte Contemporaine 401 (1985): 6 fGoogle Scholar.
11 Weiss, Dieter, “The Struggle for a Viable Islamic Economy,” Muslim World 79 (1989): 46–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
12 Möller, Alex, Billerbeck, Klaus, Heimpel, Christian, Hillebrand, Wolfgang, Taake, Hans-Herbert, Weiss, Dieter, Proposals for the Solution of the Most Important Structural, Economic and Financial Problems of the Arab Republic of Egypt. Report to the President of the Arab Republic of Egypt Anwar El Sadat (Berlin, 1980), 4–8Google Scholar. Weiss, Dieter, “Institutional Obstacles to Reform Policies: A Case Study of Egypt,” Economics 47 (1993): 66 fGoogle Scholar.
13 Weiss, Dieter, “Introducing Market Elements into a Socialist Economy: The Experience of Eastern Europe and the People's Republic of China,” L'Egypte Contemporaine 415–16 (1989): 42–44Google Scholar.
14 Cf. WorldBank, World Development Report 1991 (Washington, D.C., 1991), 145 fGoogle Scholar.
15 Weiss, , “Institutional Obstacles”, 72–75Google Scholar.
16 Cf. World Bank, 145–46Google Scholar; Weiss, Dieter, Structural Adjustment Programs in the Middle East: The Impact of Value Patterns and Social Norms (Berlin, 1992), 12 fGoogle Scholar.