Article contents
Foreigners and Municipal Reform in Istanbul: 1855–1865
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2009
Extract
Ever since it had been recognized that the decay of the Ottoman Empire could not be arrested by traditional methods, foreigners and non-Muslims had played a significant part in the Empire's modernization. The Compte de Bonneval and Baron de Tott were only the most famous of a group of foreign advisers who were employed by the Ottoman government to help reform the military establishment during the eighteenth century. During the Tanzimat era, 1839–1876, when the Porte became irrevocably committed to modernization, foreigners and non-Muslims were employed in a multitude of capacities. They ranged from the Prussian Von Moltke who was to advise on the vital problem of reorganizing the army, to Giuseppe Donnizetti, brother of the composer, who was charged with the somewhat less important task of organizing a Western-style military band.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1980
References
NOTES
1 An 1882 census conducted by the Ottoman government showed that of Istanbul's population of 875,000, fully 237,293 were inhabitants of Galata. Almost half, or 111,545, were listed as foreign subjects, most of whom were not European expatriots but native Ottomans who had obtained embassy protection. In addition, 17,589 Greeks, 29,559 Armenians, and 22,865 Jews not enjoying diplomatic protection lived within the district. The muslim population of Galata was thus only between one-fifth and one-fourth of the total. Although this census was taken almost two decades after the developments studied in this article, the numbers and proportions are at least approximate for the earlier period. The great fire of 1870 inhibited the growth of the district and population estimates for the period under discussion are consistent with the 1882 census. (This document can be found in the Istanbul University Library as “Dar as Saadat ye Bilad-i Selese Nufus Sayimi” evrak #89946. I would like to thank Professor Stanford Shaw who kindly called this document to my attention.)Google Scholar
2 De Kay, James, Sketches of Turkey in 1831 and 1832, (New York, 1833) p. 164.Google Scholar
3 Macfarlane, Charles, Constantinople in 1828. (London, 1829) pp. 11, 188.Google Scholar
4 For international economic developments see: Puryear, V. J., International Economics and Diplomacy in the Near East (London, Oxford University Press, 1935).Google Scholar
5 F. O. 78 413/62 Wellesley to Foreign Office (Ocotber 1846).Google Scholar
6 On crimes committed by British subjects see F. O. 78 678/3257 Ali to Wellesley, 23 January 1847; F. O. 8/53 Wellesley to Foreigns Office, 3 February 1847; F. O. 78/819 personal, Canning to Palmerston, 25 April 1850;Google Scholar also Journal de Constantinople 24 04, 1852.Google Scholar
7 Journal de Constantinople 17 June 1848.Google Scholar
8 Journal de Constantinople 29 November 1849.Google Scholar
9 Journal de Constantinople 14 June 1854.Google Scholar
10 Hornby, Lady E., In and Around Stambul (London, 1858), p. 177;Google ScholarGautier, Theophile, Constantinople, (Paris: Levy Freres, 1857). p. 90.Google Scholar
11 Journal de Constantinople 8 September 1856. On traditional laws prohibiting the mingling the sexes seeGoogle ScholarRefik, Ahmed, Istanbul Nasil Eleniyordu (Istanbul, 1927) pp. 152, 183, 189.Google Scholar
12 Journal de Constantinople 12 January 1861.Google Scholar
13 On the traditional institutions f Istanbul see: Nuri, Osman (Ergin), Mecelle-i Umur-i Belediye (Istanbul: Istanbul Sehiremaneti, 1914–1922);Google ScholarMantran, Robert, Istanbul dans Ia Second Moiteé XVII Siècle (Paris: Librarie Adrien Maisonneuve, 1963);Google ScholarGibb, H. A. R. and Bowen, Harold, Society and the West (London: Oxford University Press, 1950–1951) The best short treatment subject is in the Encyclopedia of Islam II, S. V. article by Bernard Lewis under “Baladiye”.Google Scholar
14 Nizamname (regulations) of Sehir Emanet- reproduced in Nuri, Osman (Ergin) pp. 1374–76.Google Scholar
15 Nizamname of Sehir Emanet reproduced in Nuri, Osman (Erǵin) p. 1376.Google Scholar
16 Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1376.Google Scholar
17 Teskere (memorandum) reproduced in Nur, Osman (Ergin) p. 1377.Google Scholar
18 F. O. 78 820/178 18 June 1850.Google Scholar
19 Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1411.Google Scholar
20 Journal de Constantinople 10 April 1856.Google Scholar
21 F. O. 78 Canning Papers, Index of Personalities.Google Scholar
22 Journal de Constantinople 23 December 1857.Google Scholar
23 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi Irade Dahilye #26592 3 February 1856.Google Scholar
24 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi Hariciye Tasnifi #6429 (undated).Google Scholar
25 Mazbata (official report) reproduced in Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1402.Google Scholar
26 Ibid.
27 Takvim-i Vekayi 30 Rebi ul Akhir 1274 (December 8, 1857).Google Scholar
28 Mazbata of the Meclis-i Tanzimat 21 Rebi ul Akhir 1274 (December 9, 1858).Google Scholar
29 Journal de Constantinople 9 September 1852.Google Scholar
30 Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1453.Google Scholar
31 Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1461.Google Scholar
32 Fundamental Regulations of the District 24 Sewal 1274, (June 7, 1858) in Dustur (Istanbul: 1284) 1:464 also see F. O. 195/612 (undated).Google Scholar
33 Ibid. article 70.
34 Ibid. article 76.
35 For members of the Council see Journal de Constantinople 26 June 1858.Google Scholar
36 F. O. 78/748 Register of British Mercantile Houses in Constantinople 26 June 1856.Google Scholar
37 List of Members reproduced in Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1432.Google Scholar
38 Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1422.Google Scholar
39 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi, Belediye Tusnifi #22231 31 07 1863, Table of Municipal debts.Google Scholar
40 Journal de Constantinople 2 October 1858..Google Scholar
41 Mazbata of the Municipal Council reproduced in Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1436.Google Scholar
42 Baš Bakanlik Arsivi, Belediye Tusnifi #22231 31 July 1803. Table of Municipal debts.Google Scholar
43 Journal de Constantinople 31 October 1859..Google Scholar
44 Baš Bakanlik Arsivi Yildiz Tasnifi #553/253 See also Dustur 1: 478.Google Scholar
45 Ibid. Paragraph 17.
46 Ibid. Paragraphs 57–103.
47 Journal de Constantinople 20 April 1854.Google Scholar
48 F. O. 8 1429/120 Bulwer to Malmesbury 16 March 1859.Google Scholar
49 Journal de Constantinople 20 October 1859.Google Scholar
50 Journal de Constantinople 20 February 1861. Levant Herald 13 February 1861.Google Scholar
51 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi Sehiremaneti Tasnifi #29615 10 Camaz-i evvel 1270 (19 December 1859).Google Scholar
52 Journal de Constantinople 18 March 1861.Google Scholar
53 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi Sehiremaneti Tasnifi #31609 28 Sevval 1277 (10 March 1861).Google Scholar
54 Ibid.
55 Journal de Constantinople 21 June 1801.Google Scholar
55 Levant Herald 21 November 1861.Google Scholar
57 Levant Herald 14 May 1862.Google Scholar
58 Journal de Constantinople 21 May 1862.Google Scholar
59 Surreya, Mehmed, Sicill-i Osmani 4 vols. (Istanbul: 1308-II (1890–1893) 111 p. 11, 12.Google Scholar Also see Nuri, Osman (Ergin), Istanbul ehiremaneti Mecmuasi #40 pp. 195–205.Google Scholar
60 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi, Dahiliye Tasnifi #34256 27 Saban 1279 (27 February 1863).Google Scholar
61 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi, Meclis-i Vala Tasnifi #22261 10 July 1863.Google Scholar
62 Bas Bakanlik Arsivi, Sehiremaneti Tasnifi #22281 19 December 1863.Google Scholar
63 Journal de Constantinople 11 February 1864.Google Scholar
64 Journal de Constantinople 19 September 1864.Google Scholar
65 Journal de Constantinople 1 December 1864.Google Scholar
66 Journal de Constantinople 10 May 1865.Google Scholar
67 Levant Herald 17 January 1866; Journal de Constantinople 23 January 1866.Google Scholar
68 Official budget for 1867–68 reproduced in Nuri, Osman (Ergin) p. 1445.Google Scholar
- 16
- Cited by