No CrossRef data available.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 15 September 2021
The “eshiret” (‘eşîret in the romanized Kurmanji Kurdish alphabet) is a highly variable and situated concept and social and political entity in Kurdistan, the homeland of ethnic Kurdish people. This essay is based on regular ethnographic fieldwork I have been conducting in part of Kurdistan, the Kurdistan Region of Iraq. My first research stint was in the mid-1990s, and I was there most recently in 2016. During the early period of my research, I had a great deal of contact with people in nonurban settings for whom an eshiret may be an important social category and contributor to individual identity.
1 Yalçin-Heckmann, Lale, Tribe and Kinship among the Kurds (Frankfurt: Peter Lang, 1991)Google Scholar; van Bruinessen, Martin, Agha, Shaikh, and State: The Social and Political Structures of Kurdistan (London: Zed Books, 1992)Google Scholar; King, Diane E., Kurdistan on the Global Stage: Kinship, Land, and Community in Iraq (New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press, 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Ölcer, Sabahat, Women in the Kurdish Family: Expectations, Obligations and Values, Familienforschung (Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS, 2020)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
2 Bruinessen, Agha, Shaikh, and State.
3 King, Diane E. and Stone, Linda, ““Lineal Masculinity: Gendered Memory within Patriliny,”” American Ethnologist 37, no. 2 (2010): 323–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar.
4 Peristiany, John G., Honour and Shame: The Values of Mediterranean Society (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1966)Google Scholar.
5 Meeker, Micheal E., “Meaning and Society in the Near East: Examples from the Black Sea Turks and the Levantine Arabs (I),” International Journal of Middle East Studies 7, no. 2 (1976): 243–70Google Scholar; King, Diane E., “The Personal is Patrilineal: Namus as Sovereignty,” in Middle Eastern Belongings, ed. King, Diane E. (London: Routledge, 2010), 60Google Scholar.
6 Brettell, Caroline B., “Anthropology, Migration, and Comparative Consciousness,” New Literary History 40, no. 3 (2009): 649–71Google Scholar.
7 Ibid.
8 Shryock, Andrew, Nationalism and the Genealogical Imagination: Oral History and Textual Authority in Tribal Jordan (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.