Article contents
An Eighteenth-Century Turkish Intelligence Report
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2009
Extract
Man has always sought to acquire information regarding his enemies, rivals, even allies, in order to understand their motivations, predict their actions, and behave according to the best of his own interests. In the Bible, we are told that Yahveh ordered Moses to send spies to the land of Canaan. Sun-Tzu's treatise on war, written five centuries B.C., comprises a chapter on intelligence. Leo VI's Taktika insist upon the importance of intelligence, while the Thousand and One Nights contains numerous accounts of Byzantine intelligence operations. Thanks to his spy-networks, the Mongol ruler Subotaï was well aware of conditions prevailing in Christian Europe. Moctezuma's spies kept him well informed as to the strength and whereabouts of the Spanish invaders. Francis Walsingham, Elizabeth l's chancellor, had set up a formidable intelligence service. As Hobbes put it, “spies are no less important to the sovereign than rays of light to the human soul for the discernment of visible objects.”
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984
References
1 Numbers 13:2.Google Scholar
2 The Art of War, XIII.Google Scholar
3 Dagron, Gilbert, “Les peuples étrangers dans Ie Stratégikon de Maurice ci les Taktika de Léon VI,” Collège de France Seminar (1981–1982).Google Scholar
4 E.g., the old Byzantine female spy in 'Umar an-Nu'mân's tale.Google Scholar
5 Prawdin, Michael, The Mongol Empire, quoted by Harry Ransom, “Intelligence and Counterintelligence,” in Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
6 Todorov, Tzvetan, La conquâte de l'Amérique (Paris: Seuil, 1982), p. 76.Google Scholar
7 Ransom, Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
8 The Citizen, XIII, 6.Google Scholar
9 Todorov, La conquête, p. 78.Google Scholar
10 As quoted by Todorov, La conquête.Google Scholar
11 Todorov, La conquete, p. 75.Google Scholar
12 Top Kapi Saray Library, Bagdad Köşk MS. 288 in 25 fol., ed. and tr. Shaw, Stanford J. under the title of Ottoman Egypt in the Eighteenth century: the Nizâmnâme-i Misir of Cezzâr Ahmed Pasha (Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press. 1964).Google Scholar According to Shaw, the Nizâmnâme was written by Jazzâr Pasha and submitted to the Porte in July 1785, shortly before the Turkish military campaign against the Mamluk Beys of Egypt. In his review of Shaw's work, Uriel Heyd demonstrates, however, and quite conclusively, that the Nizâmnâme must have been written by Jazzâr Pasha and submitted to the Porte in 1768–1769, shortly after Jazzâr had fallen out with his master 'Alī Bey of Egypt, early in September 1768, and fled to Istanbul (see Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies, 1963, p. 188).Google Scholar
13 Heyd, Uriel, Foundations of Turkish Nationalism: The Life and Teachings of Ziya Golkap (1950; rpt. 1979).Google Scholar
14 Shaw, Ottoman Egypt, p. 8.Google Scholar
15 Cf. Michel Foucault's introductory chapter to his Archaeology of Knowledge.Google Scholar
16 Such an evaluation would, in this case, be difficult to make in view of the fact that our knowledge of conditions prevailing in eighteenth-century Egypt is rather sketchy.Google Scholar
17 Nizâmnâme, p. 9 (all references are to Stanford Shaw's edition and translation).Google Scholar
18 Nizâmnâme, p. 12.Google Scholar
19 Nizâmnâme, p. 51.Google Scholar
20 One of the larger cannons used by the Ottomans (cf. Nizâmnâme, p. 10, n. 1).Google Scholar
21 Nizâmnâme, p. 37.Google Scholar
22 Nizâmnâme, p. 23. See also pp. 24, 26, and 34.Google Scholar
23 Nizâmnâme, p. 38.Google Scholar
24 Nizâmnâme, p. 12.Google Scholar
25 Nizâmnâme, p. 13.Google Scholar
26 Nizâmnâme, p. 13.Google Scholar
27 Nizâmnâme, p. 50.Google Scholar
28 Nizâmnâme, p. 13.Google Scholar
29 Nizâmnâme, pp. 9–10.Google Scholar
30 Nizâmnâme, p. 10.Google Scholar
31 Nizâmnâme, p. 14.Google Scholar
32 Nizâmnâme, p. 51.Google Scholar
33 Nizâmnâme, p. 13.Google Scholar
34 Nizâmnâme, pp. 14–15.Google Scholar
35 An evaluative study of the fiscal and socio-economic data put forward by the Nizâmnâme lies beyond the limited scope of the present work. Short of such a study, a simple enumeration of the said data seems superfluous.Google Scholar
36 See quote from Heyd, p. 499 this article.Google Scholar
37 For a corpus relating to eighteenth-century Egypt, see Holt, P., ed., Political and Social Change in Modern Egypt (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1968),Google Scholar and Raymond, A., Artisans et comfierçants au Caire au XVIIIe siécle. vol. I (Damascus: Institut Francais de Damas, 1973).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by