Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 January 2009
A famous definition of power reads: In studying political organization, we have to deal with the maintenance or establishment of social order … by the organized exercise of coercive authority through the use, or the possibility of use, of physical force.
Author's note: I am most grateful to the readers selected by the journal, whose insightful comments and bibliographical suggestions helped immensely to sharpen my argument. I would like to thank Michael E. Meeker for his extensive comments on an earlier version of this article. Among other things, he brought to my attention the need to talk about force in symbolic terms and also directed me toward Said S. Samatar's book Oral Poetry and Somali Nationalism (Cambridge, 1982). I am also grateful for the criticisms of Joshua L. Simonds, which influenced my revisions.
1 Fortes, M. and Evans-Pritchard, E. E., eds., African Political Systems (London, 1970), p. xiv.Google Scholar
2 Evans-Pritchard, E. E., The Nuer (New York, 1974)Google Scholar, “The Nuer of the Southern Sudan,” in African Political Systems, pp. 272–96Google Scholar, and The Sanusi of Cyrenaica (Oxford, 1949); Peters, E. L., “The Proliferation of Segments in the Lineage of the Bedouin of Cyrenaica,” J. R. Anthrop. Instit. 89 (1959), 29–53Google Scholar, and “Some Structural Aspects of the Feud Among Camel-Herding Bedouin of Cyrenaica,” Africa, 37, 3 (07, 1967), 261–82;CrossRefGoogle ScholarGellner, Ernest, Saints of the Atlas (Chicago, 1969).Google Scholar
3 Jamous, Raymond, Honneur et baraka. Les structures sociales traditionelles dans le Rif (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
4 Barth, Frederik, Political Leadership among Swat Pathans, London School of Economics Monographs on Social Anthropology, No. 19 (London, 1959)Google Scholar, Features of Person and Society in Swat: Collected Essays of Frederik Barth, Vol. 2 (London, 1981), and Nomads of South Persia: The Basseri Tribe of the Khamseh Confederacy (Boston, 1961).
5 Jakobson, Roman, “Concluding Statement: Linguistics and Poetics,” in Sebeok, Thomas A., ed., Style in binguage (Cambridge, Mass., 1970), p. 350–77.Google Scholar
6 Burke, Kenneth, A Rhetoric of Motives (Berkeley, 1969)Google Scholar, and Philosophy of Literary Form (Berkeley, 1973). See also Mukařovský, Jan, The Word and Verbal Art (New Haven, 1977)Google Scholar, and Structure, Sign and Function (New Haven, 1978).
7 Bloch, Maurice, ed. Political Language and Oratory in Traditional Society (London, 1975).Google Scholar Various anthropologists doing research in the Middle East have been aware of the significance of oratory. See, for example, Dale Eickelman, F., ‘The Art of Memory,” Comparative Studies in Society and History, 20, 4 (1978);CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Geertz, Clifford, “Art as a Cultural System,” in his Local Knowledge (New York, 1983), pp. 94–120.Google Scholar
8 Said Samatar, S., Oral Poetry and Somali Nationalism (Cambridge, 1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9 Ibid., pp. 24–25.
10 Bright, William, ed., Sociolinguistics (Mouton, 1966);Google ScholarHymes, Dell, Foundations in Sociolinguistics (Philadelphia, 1974);Google ScholarGumperz, John G. and Hymes, Dell, eds., The Ethnography of Communication (Washington, D.C., 1964)Google Scholar, and Directions in Sociolinguistics: The Ethnography of Communication (New York, 1972); Bauman, Richard and Scherzer, Joel, eds., Explorations in the Ethnography of Speaking (Cambridge, 1974);Google ScholarSilverstein, Michael, ”Shifters, Linguistic Categories, and Cultural Description,” in Basso, Keith H. and Selby, Henry A., eds., Meaning in Anthropology (Albuquerque, 1976), pp. 11–55.Google Scholar
11 Hobbes, Thomas, Leviathan (1651), especially Part I, Ch. XIII.Google Scholar
12 Evans-Pritchard, The Nuer, p. 151.
13 Ibid., p. 169.
14 Peters, “Structural Aspects of the Feud.”
15 P. 156: “The Corporate life is incompatible with a state of feud.”
16 “Nuer of Southern Sudan,” p. 278.
17 Evans-Pritchard, The Nuer, p. 161.
18 Peters, “Structural Aspects of the Feud,” p. 268.
19 Gellner, Saints of the Atlas, p. 1.
20 For criticism of Gellner's thesis, see Hammoudi, Abdellah, “Segmentarité, stratification sociale, pouvoir politique et sainteté. Reflections sur les theses de Geliner,” Hespéris-Tamuda, 15 (1974), 147–80;Google ScholarGeertz, Hildred, “Review of Saints of the Atlas,” Journal of American Sociology, 76 (1971), 763–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
21 Gellner, Saints of the Atlas, p. 82.
22 Evans-Pritchard, The Nuer, p. 173.
23 Ibid., p. 175.
24 Ibid., pp. 85–86.
25 Evans-Pritchard, The Nuer, pp. 163–64.
26 Gellner, Saints of the Atlas, p. 86.
27 Ibid.
28 Ibid., p. 129.
29 See note 4 for Barth's work.
30 Barth claimed that in the Swat system, individuals belonged to specific kinship or descent groups but would establish contractual relations with landowning chiefs for essentially economic and political reasons, and that these chiefs would compete for power in the political system. The basic political structure of Swat society, according to this argument, is a dyadic bond between client and patron; viewed another way, the political system consists of a field of competing patrons.
31 See Asad, Talal, “Market Model, Class Structure and Consent: A Reconsideration of Swat Political Organization,” Man, 7, 1 (1972), 79–94;CrossRefGoogle ScholarAhmad, Akbar, Millennium and Charisma among Pathans (London, 1976);Google ScholarLindholm, Charles, Generosity and Jealousy (New York, 1982).Google Scholar For criticism of Barth's Nomads, see Peters, Emrys, “The Paucity of Ritual Among Middle Eastern Pastoralists” in Islam in Tribal Societies, Ahmad, Akbar S. and Hart, David M., eds. (London, 1984), pp. 187–219.Google Scholar
32 Barth, Frederik, “Swat Pathans Reconsidered,” in Features of Person and Society in Swat, pp. 121–81.Google Scholar
33 Barth, Nomads, p. 27.
34 Ibid.
35 Ibid., p. 28.
36 Ibid., p. 32.
37 Ibid., p. 30.
38 Ibid.
39 Ibid., p. 32.
40 Ibid., p. 160.
41 Ibid., p. 37.
42 Ibid., pp. 25–26.
43 Ibid., p. 25.
44 Ibid., p. 43.
45 Ibid., pp. 29 and 81.
46 Ibid., pp. 44–45.
47 Ibid., p. 44.
48 Lancaster, William, The Rwala Bedouin Today (Cambridge, 1981), p. 7.Google Scholar
49 Ibid., p. 67.
50 Ibid., p.51.
51 Ibid., p. 52.
52 Ibid., p. 159.
53 Ibid., p. 73.
54 Ibid., p. 87.
55 For another analysis of the sheikh in the Arabian context, see Dresch, Paul, “The Position of Shaykhs Among the Northern Tribes of Yemen,” Man (N.S.), 19 (1982), pp. 31–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
56 Peters, Emrys L., “The Proliferation of Segments” and “Some Structural Aspects of the Feud.”Google Scholar
57 Eickelman, Dale F., The Middle East Today: An Anthropological Approach (Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1981), p. 102.Google Scholar
58 Meeker, Michael E., “Meaning and Society in the Near East: Examples from the Black Sea Turks and the Levantine Arabs,” Int. J. of Middle East Studies, 7 (1976), 243–70; 383–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar See also his highly original book Literature and Violence in Northern Arabia (Cambridge, 1976). An early contribution to a model of segmentary societies set forth by Meeker and others is Pierre Bourdieu's “The Sentiment of Honor in Kabyle Society,” in Honor and Shame, Peristiany, J. G., ed. (London, 1965), pp. 191–241.Google Scholar
59 For further development of his argument, one should consult Gellner's Muslim Society (Cambridge, 1981).
60 For this point, see Ahmad, Millennium and Charisma.
61 Geertz, Clifford, “In Search of North Africa,” New York Review of Books, 22 (1971);Google ScholarEickelman, Dale F., Moroccan Islam (Austin, 1976);Google ScholarRosen, Lawrence, “Rural Political Process and.National Political Structure in Morocco,” in Rural Politics and Social Change in the Middle East, Antoun, Richard and Harik, Iliya, eds. (Bloomington, 1972), pp. 214–36.Google Scholar
62 Geertz, Clifford, Geertz, Hildred, and Rosen, Lawrence, Meaning and Society in Morocco (Cambridge, 1979);Google ScholarRosen, Lawrence, Bargaining for Reality: The Construction of Social Relations in a Muslim Community (Chicago, 1984).Google Scholar
63 Jamous, Honneur et baraka, p. 5.
64 Ibid., p. 65.
65 Burckhardt, John Lewis, Notes on the Bedouins and Wahabys (London, 1831).Google Scholar
66 Montagne, R., Les Berbères et le makhzen dans le sud du Maroc (Paris, 1930).Google Scholar
67 Jamous, Honneur et baraka, p. 79.
68 Ibid., p. 70.
69 Ibid.
70 Montagne, Les Berbères, see especially Book II, Ch. IV.
71 Jamous, Honneur et baraka, p. 35.
72 Ibid., p. 104–5.
73 Ibid., p. 109.
74 Ibid.
75 Ibid., p. 182.
76 Ibid.
77 Hart, David M., The Aith Waryaghar of the Moroccan Rjf (Tucson, Ariz., 1976), p. 444.Google Scholar
78 Hart, David M., The Dadda 'Atta and His Forty Grandsons (Cambridge, 1981).Google Scholar
79 Montagne, Les Berbères, p. 221.
80 Burckhardt, Notes on the Bedouins, p. 250.