Mayssoun Sukarieh's book A Global Idea: Youth, City Networks, and the Struggle for the Arab World is an important contribution to the study of the global movement of ideas related to youth from the United States to the Middle East. Sukarieh's work stands out for its clarity and nuance, which are underpinned by rigorous fieldwork, providing a comprehensive assessment of the dynamic and complex interactions between governmental, corporate, civil society, and international development and aid organizations. This engaging work delves into the impact and role of this network of actors in shaping ideas and policies concerning youth and youth development, with a particular emphasis on the cities of Washington, DC, Amman, and Dubai. Sukarieh brings forward the concept of the “global youth development complex,” which serves as the cornerstone of the book's central thesis.

A Global Idea elucidates the significance of these urban centers, designating Washington as a central “global ideas city,” Amman as a gateway city facilitating the introduction of youth-related paradigms to the Middle East, and Dubai as a distinctive gateway city pivotal in amplifying and disseminating these critical youth-related ideas, practices, and policies throughout the region. This exploration of gateway cities and global ideas cities paves the way for future research into the mechanisms of idea dissemination beyond the realms of youth and the Middle East and will be of great benefit to readers interested in youth, the Middle East, intellectual history, and the study of ideas and discourses.

As readers engage with this insightful and accessible text, they may be driven to reflect on cities not included, like Beirut and Baghdad, that represent an important category of city in the diffusion of ideas in the region. These urban centers serve as crucial junctions, situated at the confluence of global and regional power dynamics and made more complex by the influence of state and non-state actors. They represent spaces where the discourse surrounding youth-related concepts and the mechanisms deployed to shape these ideas are dynamically contested by global and regional powers, including state and non-state actors. While the book strongly emphasizes its central theme of transmitting ideas from the Western world to the Middle East, the incorporation of cities like Beirut and Baghdad could offer valuable insights into the ever-evolving dynamics of youth-related ideas, the actors vying to shape them, and the mechanisms they employ. These dynamics may either align with or challenge the broader framework described as the “global youth development complex.”

To be clear, Sukarieh's book is a rigorous study focused on the evolving significance of youth in the Arab world and the means by which ideas related to youth have migrated from the West, particularly the United States, to the Middle East and North Africa over the past two decades. In a sense, it grapples with a simple yet critical question—how did ideas of youth and the very category, rooted in a particular Western tradition, come to hold such significance in a region where it did not have such a documented historical importance?

The book starts off by recognizing that the salience of youth as a social category in the Arab world precedes the Arab uprisings, tracing its roots back to the aftermath of the September 11 attacks in the United States. Sukarieh explains that the attacks triggered widespread security concerns regarding potential links between Arab youth and security concerns like terrorism, extremism, and religious fundamentalism, which were largely perceived to be exacerbated by a failure to integrate the region's growing youth population into the global social and political economy.

Methodologically, the book is informed by the author's expansive research conducted over a span of fifteen years, incorporating a comprehensive blend of ethnographic fieldwork, interviews, and textual analysis. This robust research contributes to the author's conceptualization of the critical role the “global youth development complex” plays in facilitating the diffusion of ideas, practices, and policies concerning youth and youth development (see pp. 9–12 for Sukarieh's discussion on methods to study and map the relevant stakeholders within this complex). While the US government occupies a notable position within this complex, the author makes clear that the spread of these ideas cannot be attributed solely to US foreign policy. Numerous actors within this wider umbrella actively adopted, modified, and spread ideas about youth following their distinctive interests and agendas. Consequently, the impact of these ideas and the work needed to advance them extended well beyond the borders of the United States.

Pushing this nuance further, the book identifies specific cities that emerged as focal points for the dissemination of youth-related ideas. Washington, DC (Chapter 1), emerges as a pivotal “global ideas city,” serving as the epicenter where numerous prevailing ideas, policies, and practices concerning youth and youth development were originally conceived and exported. Amman (Chapter 2) assumes a crucial role as a “gateway city” into the Middle East, where these ideas were initially introduced, fine-tuned, and customized to suit the Arab context. Dubai (Chapter 3), characterized as a distinct form of “gateway city,” functions as a central hub for the expansion, revamping, and diffusion of these ideas across the region. The book convincingly underscores the impact of networks of the global youth development complex and the instrumental roles played by these specific urban spaces in shaping the momentous spread of youth-related ideas across the Middle East and the salience of youth as a category to inform economic, social, and political policies.

While focusing on the spread of ideas pertaining to youth, the author concurrently raises a broader question concerning how particular ideas achieve global circulation and become ingrained in various countries, regions, and cities. In this context, the book underscores the significance of unpacking the mechanisms through which ideas navigate the globe and come to dominate in areas they did not previously. This flow of ideas is portrayed as a dynamic process, demanding intellectual, political, and physical work and considerable “financial, social, and symbolic capital” (p. 6) Here, Sukarieh's contributions to the extant literature are noteworthy. Sukarieh engages with but pushes beyond approaches that either posit the global dissemination of ideas as primarily driven by dominant states and multinational corporations and their interests or that home in on the role of varied local settings, actors, and networks in facilitating the diffusion of ideas and adapting them to new sociopolitical and economic contexts.

By highlighting the central role of global and gateway cities in steering the international spread of ideas, Sukarieh demonstrates an appreciation for the spatial dimension in understanding and explaining how ideas can spread on a global scale. These cities, Washington, Amman, and Dubai, are depicted as transnational spaces that not only help the expansion of financial capital and global commodity production but also oversee the circulation of ideas central to global capitalism.

The central claim advanced in the book posits that similar settings, actors, networks, and processes underlie the global spread of a wide array of ideas. Additionally, the focus of the book remains fixed on the spread of ideas that are integral to the functioning of global capitalism. While other categories of ideas may travel across the globe through distinct mechanisms and networks, Sukarieh contends that the core investigative approach advanced by the book remains relevant: an in-depth exploration of geographically anchored actor networks, resource mobilization, strategic utilization of key urban spaces, and the intricate balance between the objectives of dominant actors and those of their less influential counterparts (p. 8). In doing so, this comprehensive study advances critical insights into the factors and networks that shape the global dissemination of ideas.

Despite the rich complexity of its theoretical framework and the in-depth examination thereof, this book is a smooth read, eloquently written, and well-organized. There is only so much any one book can do, and its persuasive emphasis on the role of cities in shaping the spreading of ideas may encourage future research on other categories of cities, particularly at a time when the region is witnessing heightened power struggles. Most notably, cities like Beirut and Baghdad represent a missing category of cities situated at the fault lines of global and regional power politics, wherein the discourse on youth-related concepts and associated strategies for their delineation unfolds as a contested terrain embroiled in the tenuous interactions between global and regional state and non-state actors.

While the principal thrust of the book clearly revolves around the organized movement of ideas from the West to the Middle East, the inclusion of cities such as Beirut and Baghdad can help add insights into the multifaceted and ever-evolving currents by which youth-related ideas spread. These currents may either reinforce or challenge the overarching framework underlying the “global youth development complex.” An exploration of these dimensions could help factor in the interplay of exchanges and conflicts between different networks aiming to shape discourses and ideas related to youth and the resultant impact on the conception and implementation of youth-related paradigms, practices, and policies within the region. In other words, are not alternatives to the “global youth development complex” but contenders? Even if one wishes to remain focused on the former, how does it engage with the latter?

The missing engagement with cities where alternatives to the global youth development complex compete to shape ideas of youth, while justifiable within the book's scope, may inadvertently limit its capacity to extrapolate insights encompassing the broader implications of these ideas outside the purview of the chosen cases (see, in particular, the Conclusion, where Sukarieh does engage with other studies examining the spread of global ideas in the region at different periods of time).