Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-31T23:28:46.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Gender and Ottoman Social History

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 April 2014

Başak Tuğ
Başak Tuğ*
Affiliation:
Department of History, Istanbul Bilgi University, Istanbul, and Europe in the Middle East/The Middle East in Europe Fellowship Program, Forum Transregionale Studien, Berlin; e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Starting with Said's critique of Orientalism but going well beyond it, poststructuralist and postcolonial critiques of modernity have challenged not only one-dimensional visions of Western modernity—by “multiplying” or “alternating” it with different modernities—but also the binaries between the modern and the traditional/premodern/early modern, thus resulting in novel, more inclusive ways of thinking about past experiences. Yet, while scholars working on the Middle East have successfully struggled against the Orientalist perception of the Middle East as the tradition constructed in opposition to the Western modern, they often have difficulties in deconstructing the tradition within, that is, the premodern past. They have traced the alternative and multiple forms of modernities in Middle Eastern geography within the temporal borders of “modernity.” However, going beyond this temporality and constructing new concepts—beyond the notion of tradition—to understand the specificities of past experiences (which are still in relationship with the present) remains underdeveloped in the social history of the Middle East.

Type
Roundtable
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 46 , Issue 2: Politics of Benevolence , May 2014 , pp. 379 - 381
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Jennings, Ronald C., “Women in Early 17th Century Ottoman Judicial Records—the Shari'a Court of Anatolian Kayseri,” Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 18 (1975): 53–114Google Scholar; idem, “Kadi, Court and Legal Procedure in Seventeenth Century Ottoman Kayseri,” Studia Islamica 48 (1978): 133–72; Gerber, Haim, “Social and Economic Position of Women in an Ottoman City, Bursa, 1600–1700,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 12 (1980): 231–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, Economy and Society in an Ottoman City: Bursa, 1600–1700 (Jerusalem: Hebrew University, 1988).

2 İslamoğlu-İnan, Huri, Constituting Modernity: Private Property in the East and West (London and New York: I. B. Tauris, 2004)Google Scholar; Deringil, Selim, “‘They Live in a State of Nomadism and Savagery’: The Late Ottoman Empire and the Post-Colonial Debate,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 43 (2003): 311–42Google Scholar.

3 Kırlı, Cengiz, “Yolsuzluğun İcadı: 1840 Ceza Kanunu, İktidar Ve Bürokrasi,” Tarih ve Toplum Yeni Yaklaşımlar 4 (2006): 45–119Google Scholar; Balsoy, Gülhan, The Politics of Reproduction in Ottoman Society, 1838–1900 (London: Pickering & Chatto, 2013)Google Scholar; Ekmekcioglu, Lerna, “A Climate for Abduction, a Climate for Redemption: The Politics of Inclusion during and after the Armenian Genocide,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 55 (2013): 522–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

4 Faroqhi, Suraiya, Artisans of Empire: Crafts and Craftspeople under the Ottomans (London: I. B. Tauris, 2009)Google Scholar; Salzmann, Ariel, Tocqueville in the Ottoman Empire: Rival Paths to the Modern State (Boston: Brill, 2004)Google Scholar.

5 Hamadeh, Shirine, The City's Pleasure: Istanbul in the Eighteenth Century (Seattle, Wash.: University of Washington Press, 2008)Google Scholar; Esmer, Tolga, “Economies of Violence, Imperial Governance, and the Socio-Cultural Dimensions of Banditry in the Ottoman Empire, c. 1800,” Past & Present 224 (forthcoming, August 2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

6 Scott, Joan, “Gender: A Useful Category of Historical Analysis,” American Historical Review 91 (1986): 1053–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

7 Ibid., 1067.

8 For social history, see Jennings, “Women in Early 17th Century Ottoman Judicial Records”; Haim Gerber, “Social and Economic Position of Women”; Faroqhi, Suraiya, “Crime, Women, and Wealth in the Eighteenth-Century Anatolian Countryside,” in Women in the Ottoman Empire: Middle Eastern Women in the Early Modern Era, ed. Zilfi, Madeline C. (Leiden: Brill, 1997)Google Scholar; and idem, Stories of Ottoman Men and Women: Establishing Status, Establishing Control (Istanbul: Eren, 2002). More explicitly feminist works include Tucker, Judith E., In the House of the Law: Gender and Islamic Law in Ottoman Syria and Palestine (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 1998)Google Scholar; Peirce, Leslie, Morality Tales: Law and Gender in the Ottoman Court of Aintab (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2003)Google Scholar; and Semerdjian, Elyse, “Off the Straight Path”: Illicit Sex, Law, and Community in Ottoman Aleppo (Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

9 Peirce, Leslie, The Imperial Harem, Women and Sovereignty in the Ottoman Empire (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

10 Zilfi, Madeline C., Women and Slavery in the Late Ottoman Empire: The Design of Difference (New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010)Google Scholar.

11 Ze'evi, Dror, Producing Desire: Changing Sexual Discourse in the Ottoman Middle East, 1500–1900 (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2006)Google Scholar; Miller, Ruth Austin, “Rights, Reproduction, Sexuality, and Citizenship in the Ottoman Empire and Turkey,” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 32 (2007): 347–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 Baer, Marc David, “Islamic Conversion Narratives of Women: Social Change and Gendered Religious Hierarchy in Early Modern Ottoman Istanbul,” Gender & History 16 (2004): 425–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Krstić, Tijana, Contested Conversions to Islam: Narratives of Religious Change in the Early Modern Ottoman Empire (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; idem, “Contesting Subjecthood and Sovereignty in Ottoman Galata in the Age of Confessionalization: The Carazo Affair, 1613–1617,” Oriente Moderno 93 (2013): 422–53; Dursteler, Eric, Renegade Women: Gender, Identity, and Boundaries in the Early Modern Mediterranean (Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2011)Google Scholar.

13 Scott, Joan, Gender and the Politics of History (New York: Columbia University Press, 1988), 2Google Scholar.