Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:33:40.110Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

FROM PROPERTY TO CIVIL SOCIETY: THE HISTORICAL TRANSFORMATION OF VAKIFS IN MODERN TURKEY (1923–2013)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 July 2015

Gizem Zencirci
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this article, I argue that shifting development discourses have shaped the meaning and function of vakıfs (religious endowments) in Turkey since the establishment of the republic in 1923. I identify three periods defined by their distinctive development discourse, and show how each of these discourses made vakıfs into both an object and a site of development. In the etatist discourse of the 1930s, vakıfs were articulated as national treasures tasked with financing state-led economic development. With the shift to a mixed economy discourse in the 1960s, vakıfs were reconfigured as private philanthropic foundations expected to create a skilled labor force. The neoliberal development discourse of the 1980s transformed vakıfs into welfare organizations focused on poverty. This article shows that in all three of these periods, the relationship between state, Islam, economy, and society was articulated, legitimized, and consolidated with reference to a seemingly stagnant but in fact malleable institution inherited from the Ottoman Empire—the vakıf. I refer to this process as the “local production of development,” a conceptualization emphasizing how global discourses of development are formed and transformed at the local level.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 47 , Issue 3 , August 2015 , pp. 533 - 554
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

Author's note: Research for this article was partially funded by a dissertation fellowship from the University of Notre Dame's Science of Generosity Initiative. I presented an earlier version of the article at the International Society for Third Sector Research Conference in 2010. I thank Alev Çınar, Amy Singer, Catherine Herrold, the anonymous IJMES reviewers, and the editors of IJMES for their valuable comments and constructive criticisms.

1 Kuran, Timur, “Why the Middle East is Economically Underdeveloped: Historical Mechanisms of Institutional Stagnation,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 18 (2004): 71–90Google Scholar. See also Turner, Bryan, Weber and Islam: A Critical Study (London: Routledge, 1974)Google Scholar.

2 Doumani, Beshara, “Endowing Family: Waqf, Property Devolution and Gender in Greater Syria, 1800 to 1860,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 40 (1998): 3–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Fay, Mary Ann, “Women and Waqf: Toward a Reconsideration of Women's Place in the Mamluk Household,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 29 (1997): 33–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hoexter, Miriam, Endowments, Rulers and Community: Vakıf Al-Haramayn in Ottoman Algiers (Leiden: Brill, 1998)Google Scholar; Shatzmiller, Maya, “Islamic Institutions and Property Rights: The Case of the ‘Public Good’ Waqf,” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient 44 (2011): 44–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Singer, Amy, Charity in Islamic Societies (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2008)Google Scholar.

3 See, for example, Clark, Janine A., Islam, Charity and Activism: Middle Class Networks and Social Welfare in Egypt, Jordan and Yemen (Bloomington, Ind.: Indiana University Press, 2003)Google Scholar; Pioppi, Daniella, “The Privatization of Social Services as a Regime Strategy: Islamic Endowments (Awqaf) in Egypt,” in Debating Arab Authoritarianism: Dynamics and Durability in Nondemocratic Regimes, ed. Schlumberger, Oliver (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2007)Google Scholar; Challand, Benoit, “A Nahda of Charitable Organizations? Health Service Provision and the Politics of Aid in Palestine,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 40 (2008): 227–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pierret, Thomas and Selvik, Kjetil, “Limits of ‘Authoritarian Upgrading’ in Syria: Private Welfare, Islamic Charities and the Rise of the Zayd Movement,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 41 (2009): 595–614CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Atia, Mona, Building a House in Heaven: Pious Neoliberalism and Islamic Charity in Egypt (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Cammett, Melani, Compassionate Communalism: Welfare and Sectarianism in Lebanon (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2014)Google Scholar.

4 May, Samantha, “Political Piety: The Politicization of Zakat,” Middle East Critique 22 (2013): 149–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Daniella Pioppi, “The Privatization of Social Services.”

5 Crush, Jonathan, ed., Power of Development (London: Routledge, 1995), 3Google Scholar.

6 Escobar, Arturo; Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1995)Google Scholar; Ferguson, James, The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Mitchell, Timothy; Rule of Experts: Egypt, Techno-Politics, Modernity (Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press, 2002)Google Scholar.

7 Göle, Nilüfer, “Toward an Autonomization of Politics and Civil Society in Turkey,” in Politics in the Third Turkish Republic, ed. Heper, Metin and Evin, Ahmet (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1994)Google Scholar; Langohr, Vickie, “Too Much Civil Society, Too Little Politics: Egypt and Liberalizing Arab Regimes,” Comparative Politics 36 (2004): 181–204CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Challand, Benoit, “The Counter-Power of Civil Society and the Emergence of a New Political Imaginary in the Arab World,” Constellations 18 (2011): 271–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Navaro-Yashin, Yael, “Uses and Abuses of ‘State and Civil Society’ in Contemporary Turkey,” New Perspectives on Turkey 18 (1998): 1–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Wiktorowicz, Quintan, “Civil Society as Social Control: State Power in Jordan,” Comparative Politics 33 (2000): 43–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Elyachar, Julia, Markets of Dispossession: NGOs, Economic Development and the State in Cairo (Durham, N.C.: Duke University Press, 2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

9 Zencirci, Gizem, “Civil Society's History: New Constructions of Ottoman Heritage by the Justice and Development Party in Turkey,” European Journal of Turkish Studies 19 (2014)Google Scholar, accessed 25 May 2015, http://www.ejts.revues.org/5076.

10 Archival research has been conducted at the VGM Library, the National Library of Turkey, the Library of the Centre for Islamic Studies (ISAM), the Library of the Vehbi Koç and Ankara Research Center (VEKAM), and the Republican Archives of the Office of the Turkish Prime Ministry. All translations from Turkish to English are my own unless otherwise noted.

11 Işın, E. and Lefebvre, A., “The Gift of Law,” European Journal of Social Theory 8 (2005): 12CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

12 van Leeuwen, Richard, Waqfs and Urban Structures: The Case of Ottoman Damascus (Leiden: Brill, 1999)Google Scholar; Kozlowski, Gregory, “Imperial Authority, Benefactions and Endowments (Awqaf) in Mughal India,” Journal of Economic and Social History of the Orient 38 (1995): 355–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

13 Özbek, Nadir, “The Politics of Poor Relief in the Late Ottoman Empire, 1876–1914,” New Perspectives on Turkey 21 (1999): 7CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Kuran, Timur, “The Provision of Public Goods under Islamic Law: Origins, Impact and Limitations of the Waqf System,” Law and Society Review 35 (2001): 843CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 Çızakca, Murat, A History of Philanthropic Foundations: The Islamic World from the Seventh Century to the Present (Istanbul: Boğaziçi University Press, 2000), 72–74Google Scholar.

16 Powers, David, “Orientalism, Colonialism and Legal History: The Attack on Muslim Family Endowments in Algeria and India,” Comparative Studies in Society and History 31 (1989): 535–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Ziya Gökalp; “Vakıf,” cited in Ergin, Osman Nuri, Türk Tarihinde Evkaf, Belediye ve Patrikhaneler (Istanbul: Türkiye Basımevi, 1937), 52Google Scholar.

18 Beverley, Eric Lewis, “Property, Authority and Personal Law: Waqf in Colonial South Asia,” South Asia Research 31 (2011): 155–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Pianciola, Niccolo and Sartori, Paolo, “Waqf in Turkestan: The Colonial Legacy and the Fate of an Islamic Institution in Early Soviet Central Asia, 1917–1924,” Central Asian Survey 26 (2007): 475–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Özaral, Başak, “Islam and Moral Economy,” in The Sociology of Islam: Secularism, Economy and Politics, ed. Keskin, Tuğrul (Ithaca, N.Y.: Ithaca Press, 2011), 31–32Google Scholar.

20 Nadir Özbek, “The Politics of Poor Relief in the Late Ottoman Empire,” 8.

21 On the topic of poor relief in the 19th-century Ottoman Empire, see Özbek, Nadir, Osmanlı İmparatorluğu'nda Sosyal Devlet: Siyaset, İktidar ve Meşruiyet 1876–1914 (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2002)Google Scholar; and Ener, Mine, Managing Egypt's Poor and the Politics of Benevolence, 1800–1952 (Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 2003)Google Scholar.

22 Birtek, Faruk, “The Rise and Fall of Etatism in Turkey, 1932–1950: The Uncertain Road in the Restructuring of a Semiperipheral Economy,” Review 8 (1985): 407–38Google Scholar; Öniş, Ziya, “The State and Economic Development in Contemporary Turkey: Etatism to Neoliberalism and Beyond,” in Turkey Between East and West: New Challenges for a Rising Regional Power, ed. Mastny, Vojtech and Nation, R. Craig (Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1996): 155–78Google Scholar.

23 Kadıoğlu, Ayşe, “The Paradox of Turkish Nationalism and the Construction of Official Identity,” Middle Eastern Studies 32 (1996): 177–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Çınar, Alev, Modernity, Islam and Secularism in Turkey: Bodies, Places and Time (Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 2005)Google Scholar.

24 Cumhuriyetten Önce ve Sonra Vakıflar (Istanbul: Cumhuriyet Matbaası, 1937), 9.

25 Kunter, Halim Baki, Türk Vakıf ve Vakfiyeleri Üzerine Mücmel bir Etüd (Istanbul: Cumhuriyet Matbaası, 1939), 9–10Google Scholar.

26 Buğra, Ayşe, Kapitalizm, Yoksulluk ve Türkiye'de Sosyal Politika (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2008), 99Google Scholar.

27 The state still accepted the word vakif for endowments created before the law went into effect.

28 “Arsa başkasının, Bina Başkasının Olamayacak,” Akşam, 1 December 1934.

29 “Evkafın Islahı,” Vakit, 2 August 1929.

30 Due to its focus on the Turkish-Islamic vakıf, this article does not examine the transformation of congregational vakıfs. On the latter, see İmamoğlu, Altuğ, Azınlık Vakıfları ve Yabancıların Taşınılmaz Mal Edinimleri (Ankara: Yazıt Yayınları, 2006)Google Scholar; and Reyna, Yuda and Zonana, Ester, Cemaat Vakıfları (Istanbul: Gözlem Yayınları, 2003)Google Scholar.

31 Evkaf Umum Müdürlüğünün Cumhuriyetin İlk 10 Senesindeki İşler Hakkında Rapordur (Ankara: Başvekalet Matbaası, 1933).

32 Procedures of mukataa and icareteyn allowed for the conversion of theoretically inalienable vakıfs into transferrable properties and assets. Wth the mukataa method, tenants were given the right of permanent, eternal lease to a given vakıf property, whereas with the icareteyn method, tenants were allowed to obtain perpetual rights to vakıf lands. Both procedures allowed the sale and transfer of vakıf properties. For a detailed discussion of these procedures, see Dallal, Ahmad, “The Islamic Institution of Waqf: A Historical Overview,” in Islam and Social Policy, ed. Heynemann, Stephen (Nashville, Tenn.: Vanderbilt University Press, 2004), 26–28Google Scholar.

33 Cumhuriyetten Önce ve Sonra Vakıflar, 12.

34 Vakıflar (Ankara: Başvekalet Matbaası, 1937), 21.

35 Vakıflarımız (Istanbul: Cumhuriyet Matbaası, 1941), 24.

36 “Vakıflar Genel Direktörü Diyor ki,” Ulus, 1 October 1935.

37 Evkaf Umum Müdürlüğünün Cumhuriyetin İlk 10 Senesindeki İşler Hakkında Rapordur, 5.

38 Halim Baki Kunter, “Türk Vakıfları ve Vakfiyeleri,” Vakıflar Dergisi 1 (1938): 105.

39 Vakıflar Galerisi Hakkında Muhtasar Izahat (Ankara: Devlet Matbaaası, 1939), 4–6.

40 “Insan ve Kültür: Vakıf Galerisi,” Ulus, 19 December 1935.

41 “Ankara Mektupları: Vakfa Aid Mahlül Yerlerin Tasfiyesi,” Ulus, 21 December 1936.

42 Ali Himmet Berki, “Islamda Vakıf,” İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi (1957): 20.

43 Ergin, Osman, Türk Tarihinde Evkaf, Belediye ve Patrikhaneler (Istanbul: Türkiye Basımevi, 1937), 33Google Scholar.

44 “Vakıfları Yolsuz Yıkanlar,” Tan, 9 October 1935.

45 “Evkaf Binaları Yıktırılmayacak,” Tan, 19 November 1935.

46 “Belediye-Evkaf: Hakem Heyeti Kararının Temyizinden Vazgeçildi,” Akşam, 13 December 1936.

47 Işın and Lefebvre, “The Gift of Law,” 13.

48 Aydın, Davut, “Cumhuriyet Dönemi Vakıfları Tarihi Bir Bakış ve Vergi Muafiyetine Sahip Vakıfların Mali Analizi,” in Türkiye'de Hayırseverlik: Vatandaşlar, Vakıflar ve Sosyal Adalet (Istanbul: TÜSEV Yayınları, 2006), 40.Google Scholar

49 For an explanation of VakıfBank's founding, see Vakıflar Umum Müdürlüğü, 1950–1957 (Ankara: VGM Yayınları, 1958), 48–58.

50 “History,” accessed 1 August 2014, http://www.vakifbank.com.tr/history.aspx?pageID=840.

51 Pamuk, Şevket, “Political Economy of Industrialization in Turkey,” MERIP 93 (1981): 26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Bayar, Ali, “The Developmental State and Economic Policy in Turkey,” Third World Quarterly 17 (1996): 776–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

52 “Her Ekonomi Karmadır,” Yeni Istanbul, 31 August 1965.

53 Buğra, Ayşe. State and Business in Modern Turkey: A Comparative Study (Albany, N.Y.: State University of New York Press, 1994), 132Google Scholar.

54 Ibid., 133–34.

55 For more on this organization, see Buğra, State and Business in Modern Turkey, 138–39, 245–50.

56 Ziya Ortaç, “Herşeyi Benden Beklemeyiniz,” Akbaba, 14 January 1965.

57 Buğra, State and Business in Modern Turkey, 77.

58 For the full text of the 1967 vakıf law, see Vakıflar Kanunu, accessed 6 June 2014, http://arsiv.diyanetvakfi.org.tr/mevzuat/1b.pdf.

59 Türkiye'de Vakıflar (Ankara: VGM Yayınları, 1969): 5.

60 Vehbi Koç Vakfı (Istanbul: Vehbi Koç Vakfı Yayınları, 1969): 64–66.

61 For example, see “Sayın Vehbi Koç Babasını Anlatıyor,” Bankacılık Dergisi, 23 December 1963.

62 Ahmed Emin Yalman, “Tehlike Karşısında Basiret,” Durum, 15 April 1965.

63 Singer, Amy, “The Persistence of Philanthropy,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 31 (2011): 564CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

64 “Özel Sektör Eğitim Harekatını Desteklemelidir,” Ticaret, 21 June 1967.

65 Güneri, Hasan, Türk Medeni Kanunu Açısından Vakıfta Amaç Kavramı ve Amacına Göre Vakıf Türleri (Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası, 1976), 55Google Scholar.

66 In the Ottoman Empire, with the exception of religious minorities, those who created vakıfs were already exempt from paying taxes. For more on Ottoman taxation policy, see Coşgel, Metin M., “Efficiency and Continuity in Public Finance: The Ottoman System of Taxation,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 37 (2005): 567–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

67 See clause no. 4 of the 1967 vakıf law.

68 For a list of tax-exempt vakıfs, see http://www.gib.gov.tr/index.php?id=406, accessed 6 June 2014.

69 “Büyük Sermayenin Talepleri,” Yön, 18 April 1962.

70 Emre Kocaoğlu, “Beyin Yıkama Ortaklığı,” Ant, 16 June 1966.

71 “Yeni Vakıf Sayıları,” accessed 6 June 2014, http://www.vgm.gov.tr/db/dosyalar/webicerik194.pdf.

72 Yediyildiz, Bahaattin, “Sosyal Bütünleşme Açısından Vakıflar,” in 1. Vakıf Haftası: 5–11 Aralık 1983 (Ankara: VGM Yayınları, 1984)Google Scholar; Kozak, Erol, Bir Sosyal Siyaset Müessesi Olarak Vakıf: Tarihte Gördüğü ve Günümüzde Görebileceği İşlevler Açısından Bir Tahlil Denemesi (Istanbul: Akabe Yayınları, 1985)Google Scholar; Kazıcı, Ziya, İslami ve Sosyal Açıdan Vakıflar (Istanbul: Milli Eğitim Basımevi, 1985)Google Scholar; Yiğitgüden, Galip, “Türk-Islam Kültüründe Vakıf Kavramı ve Sosyal Yaşantımızdaki Yeri,” in 2. Vakıf Haftası: 3–9 Aralık 1984 (Ankara: VGM Yayınları, 1985)Google Scholar.

73 Kozak, Bir Sosyal Siyaset Müessesi Olarak Vakıf, 58.

74 Öztürk, Nazif, “Hayri ve Sosyal Hizmetler Açısından Vakıflar,” in 1. Vakıf Haftası: 5–11 Aralık 1983 (Ankara: VGM Yayınları, 1984), 42Google Scholar.

75 See Whitehead, Christine, “Emergency Social Funds: The Experience of Bolivia and Peru,” Development in Practice 5 (1995): 53–57Google Scholar; Cornia, Giovanni Andrea, “Social Funds in Stabilization and Adjustment Programmes: A Critique,” Development and Change 32 (2001): 1–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

76 “Fakirlere Müjde,” Milliyet, 17 May 1986.

77 Anavatan İktidarının Yüzakı İcraatlarından Biri: Sosyal Yardımlaşma ve Dayanışmayı Teşvik Fonu: Hayırlı Fon (Ankara: Anavatan Partisi Yayınları, 1987).

78 “Özal: ‘Sosyal Dayanışma Bizde Batıdan Farklı,'” Cumhuriyet, 2 June 1986.

79 Mümtaz Soysal, “FAKFUKFUN,” Milliyet, 4 June 1986.

80 “Demirel ‘Türk İnsanı Çok Gururludur’ dedi,” Milliyet, 7 June 1986.

81 “DSP'nin Fona Bakışı,” Hürriyet, 4 June 1986.

82 “Demirel dedi ki,” Milliyet, 7 June 1986.

83 “Peygamber Emri Yasa,” Cumhuriyet, 30 May 1986.

84 “FAKFUKFON'da emrivaki yapılıyor,” Hürriyet, 3 June 1986.

85 Keyman, Fuat and İçduygu, Ahmet, “Globalization, Civil Society and Citizenship in Turkey: Actors, Boundaries and Discourses,” Citizenship Studies 7 (2003): 219–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kuzmanovic, Daniella, Refractions of Civil Society in Turkey (New York: Palgrave MacMillan, 2002)Google Scholar.

86 “Yeni Vakıf Sayıları.”

87 Zevkliler, Aydın, “Türkiye'de Vakıflar,” Cumhuriyet Dönemi Türkiye Ansiklopedisi (15): 1438–46Google Scholar.

88 On neoliberal Islam in Turkey, see, among other works, Tuğal, Cihan, Passive Revolution: Absorbing the Islamic Challenge to Capitalism (Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 2009)Google Scholar; and Atasoy, Yıldız, Islam's Marriage with Neoliberalism: State Transformation in Turkey (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar. On neoliberal Islam elsewhere, see Atia, Building a House in Heaven; Rudnyckyj, Daromir, Spiritual Economies: Islam, Globalization and the Afterlife of Development (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 2010)Google Scholar; and Rinker, Cortney Hughes, “Creating Neoliberal Citizens in Morocco: Reproductive Health, Development Policy and Popular Islamic Beliefs,” Medical Anthropology 3 (2014): 1–17Google Scholar.

89 Eder, Mine, “Retreating State? Political Economy of Welfare Regime Change in Turkey,” Middle East Law and Governance 2 (2010): 152–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Morvaridi, Behrooz, “The Politics of Philanthropy and Welfare Governance: The Case of Turkey,” European Journal of Development Research 25 (2013): 305–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Göçmen, Ipek, “Religion, Politics and Social Assistance in Turkey: The Rise of Religiously Motivated Associations,” Journal of European Social Policy 24 (2014): 92–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Işık, Damla, “Vakıf as Intent and Practice: Charity and Poor Relief in Turkey,” International Journal of Middle East Studies 46 (2014): 302–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

90 For a range of views on the AKP's welfare reforms, see Özbek, Nadir, Cumhuriyet Türkiye'sınde Sosyal Güvenlik ve Sosyal Politikalar (Istanbul: Tarih Vakfı Emeklilik Gözetim Merkezi, 2006)Google Scholar; Buğra, Ayşe, Kapitalizm, Yoksulluk ve Türkiye'de Sosyal Politika (Istanbul: İletişim Yayınları, 2008)Google Scholar; Coşar, Simten and Yeğenoğlu, Metin, “The Neoliberal Restructuring of Turkey's Social Security System,” Monthly Review 60 (2009): 36–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar; and Bakırezer, Güven and Demirer, Yücel, “Ak Parti'nin Sosyal Siyaseti,” in AKP Kitabı Bir Dönüşümün Bilançosu, ed. Uzgel, İlhan and Duru, Bülent (Ankara: Phoenix, 2009)Google Scholar.

91 See “Sosyal Harcama İstatistikleri,” accessed 27 April 2011, http://ekutup.dpt.gov.tr/ekonomi/rip/tr/kamu_kesimi_sosyal_harcama_istatistikleri.pdf.

92 “Vakıfların Türlerine Göre Dağılımı,” accessed 6 June 2014, http://www.vgm.gov.tr/db/dosyalar/webicerik195.pdf.

93 For the full text of the 2004 Law of Associations, see http://mevzuat.basbakanlik.gov.tr/Metin.Aspx?MevzuatKod=7.5.8038&sourceXmlSearch=dernek&MevzuatIliski=0, accessed 6 June 2014. For the full text of Vakıf Law 5737, see http://www.vgm.gov.tr/icerikdetay.aspx?Id=62, accessed 8 June 2014.

94 Işık, “Vakıf as Intent and Practice,” 311.

95 Vakıf Medeniyeti Yılı 2006: Vakıflar Dergisi Özel Sayısı (Ankara: VGM Yayınları, 2006), 6.

96 For contemporary politics of Neo-Ottomanism in Turkey, see Öncü, Ayşe, “The Politics of Istanbul's Ottoman Heritage in the Era of Globalism: Refractions through the Prism of a Theme Park,” in Cities of the South: Citizenship and Exclusion in the 21st Century, ed. Drieskens, Barbara, Wimmen, Heiko, and Mermier, Franck (London: Saqi Books, 2007)Google Scholar; Onar, Nora Fisher, “Echoes of a Universalism Lost: Rival Representations of the Ottomans in Today's Turkey,” Middle Eastern Studies 45 (2009): 229–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Mills, Amy, “The Ottoman Legacy: Urban Geographies, National Imaginaries, and Global Discourses of Tolerance,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 31 (2011): 183–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

97 See Işık, “Vakıf as Intent and Practice.”

98 Yusuf Bayezit, author's interview, Ankara, 7 December 2009.

99 Güner, Osman, “Yoksulluk, Din ve Sivil Toplum,” Köprü Dergisi 88 (2004)Google Scholar, accessed 11 February 2015, http://www.koprudergisi.com/index.asp?Bolum=EskiSayilar&Goster=Yazi&YaziNo=635.

100 “Kültür ve Turizm Bakanı Erkan Mumcu'nun Konuşması,” in Cumhuriyetin 80. Yılında Uluslararası Vakıf Sempozyumu Kitabı: 15–17 Aralık 2003 (Ankara: VGM Yayınları, 2004).

101 Kamat, Sangeeta, “The Privatization of Public Interest: Theorizing NGO Discourse in a Neoliberal Era,” Review of International Political Economy 11 (2004): 155–76CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

102 Tabakoğlu, Ahmet, “Osmanlı Sosyal Devlet Anlayışı,” Sosyal Politikalar Dergisi 1 (2006): 72Google Scholar.

103 Zencirci, Gizem, “Illusory Debates: How the ‘Sadaka Culture’ Discourse Masked the Rise of Social Assistance in Turkey,” Asian Journal of Social Science 43 (2015): 125–50Google Scholar.

104 “Yeni Vakıf Sayıları.”

105 See Işık, Damla, “The Specter and Reality of Corruption in State and Civil Society: Privatizing and Auditing Poor Relief in Turkey,” Comparative Studies of South Asia, Africa and the Middle East 32 (2012): 57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

106 “Vergisiz Vakıf Lideri AKP,” Taraf, 13 May 2014.

107 “Kirlendik ey Cemaat!” Radikal, 16 February 2014.

108 “Hopa'da iftar veren IHH ekibine saldırı,” Radikal, 15 July 2014.

109 Escobar, Encountering Development, 98.