Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T00:54:54.127Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Disintegration of the Armenian Cause in the United States, 1918–1927

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Mark Malkasian
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

With the conclusion of World War I, the Armenian cause in the United States enjoyed a brief season of hope and vitality. American support was an offshoot of international sympathy for Armenian suffering and an unshakable sense of optimism. In a burst of national goodwill, the United States seemed intent on freeing the Armenians from centuries of persecution. Americans from the halls of Congress to the church pews of Mississippi joined together in the effort. They delivered speeches, wrote letters, exchanged ideas, and donated millions of dollars. Within less than a decade, however, the Armenian cause was irreparably splintered and largely forgotten.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 16 , Issue 3 , August 1984 , pp. 349 - 365
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1984

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

NOTES

1 Joseph, L. Grabill, Protestant Diplomacy and the Near East: Missionary Influence on American Policy, 1810–1927(Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971), p. 19.Google Scholar

2 Ibid., p. 69.

3 Ibid., p. 42.

4 Robert, L. Daniel, American Philanthropy in the Near East, 1820–1960 (Athens, Ohio: Ohio University Press, 1970), p. 150.Google Scholar

5 Howard, M. Sachar, The Emergence of the Middle East. 1914–1924 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969), pp. 342–343.Google Scholar

6 James, L. Barton, Story of Near East Relief (1915–1930): An Interpretation (New York: Macmillan Co., 1930), p. 382.Google Scholar

7 Ibid., p. xi.

8 Herbert, Hoover, Memoirs: Years of Adventure. 1874–1920 (New York: Macmillan Co., 1951), p. 385.Google Scholar

9 Grabill, , Protestant Diplomacy. p. 104.Google Scholar

10 Ibid., pp. 109–110.

11 Ibid.

12 James, H. Tashjian, ed., “Life and Papers of Vahan Cardashian,” Armenian Review, X (Spring, 1957), p. 52.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., p. 8.

14 Senate Joint Resolution 378, introduced on December 10, 1918, read as follows: “Resolved, That in the opinion of the Senate, Armenia, including the six vilayets of Turkish Armenia and Cilicia, Russian Armenia, and the northern part of the Province of Azerbaijan, Persian Armenia, should be independent and that it is the hope of the Senate that the peace conference will make arrangements for helping Armenia to establish an independent republic.”

15 James, H. Tashjian. “Life and Papers of Vahan Cardashian,” Armenian Review, XI (Autumn, 1958), pp. 136–137.Google Scholar

16 James, W. Gerard, My First Eighty-three Years in America (Garden City, New York: Doubleday & Co., 1951), pp. 284–285.Google Scholar

17 The following are the names of the ACIA's membership as they appeared in A Report of the Activities, 1918–1922 (New York: Armenian Press Bureau, 1922), p. 4: Executive Committee: James W. Gerard (chairman), Charles Evans Hughes (honorary chairman), Elihu Root, Henry Cabot Lodge, John Sharp Williams, Alfred E. Smith, Frederic Courtland Penfield, Charles W. Eliot, Cleveland H. Dodge. General Committee: William Jennings Bryan, Alton B. Parker, Root, Lodge, Williams, Charles S. Thomas, Lyman Abbott, Gov. Bartlett (N.H.), James L. Barton, Gov. Beeckman (RI.), Alice Stone Blackwell, Charles J. Bonaparte, Gov. Boyle (Nevada), Nicholas Murray Butler, Gov. Campbell (Arizona), Gov. Carey (Wyoming), Gov. Catts (Florida), Gov. Cooper (South Carolina), Gov. Cox (Ohio), Charles Stewart Davison, Rt. Rev. J. H. Darlington, Dodge, Gov. Dorsey (Georgia), Eliot, Rt. Rev. William F. Faber, Admiral Bradley A. Fiske, Lindley M. Garrison, James Cardinal Gibbons, Martin H. Glynn, Samuel Gompers, Madison Grant, Lloyd C. Griscom, Gov. Harding (Iowa), Gov. Harrington (Maryland), Albert Bushnell Hart, Sara Duryea Hazen, Myron T. Herrick, John Grier Hibben, Gov. Holcomb (Connecticut), Hamilton Holt, George A. Hurd, Richard M. Hurd, Henry W. Jessup, Robert Ellis Jones, Gov. Larrazolo (New Mexico), Gov. Lister (Washington), Edward C. Little, Julian W. Mack, William T. Manning, Elizabeth Marbury, Rt. Rev. Wm. H. Moreland, Gov. Norbeck (South Dakota), Penfield, George Haven Putnam, Rt. Rev. P. N. Rhinelander, Ernest W. Riggs, Wm. Henry Roberts, Gov. Robertson (Oklahoma), Jacob G. Schurman, Gov. Smith (New York), Gov. Sproul (Pennsylvania), Oscar S. Straus, Rt. Rev. A. C. Thompson, Gov. Townsend, Jr. (Delaware), Rt. Rev. B. D. Tucker Rt. Rev. Wm. W. Webb, Benjamin Ide Wheeler, Everett P. Wheeler, Rt. Rev. J. R. Winchester, Stephen S. Wise, Gov. Withycombe (Oregon), Gov. Yager (Porto Rico).Google Scholar

18 Tashjian, , “Life and Papers” (Spring, 1957), p. 9.Google Scholar

19 Ibid., p. 10.

20 Richard, G. Hovannisian, The Republic of Armenia, 1918–1919, vol. I (Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1971; reprint ed., 1974), pp. 309–310.Google Scholar

21 On March 7, 1919, five of the leading members of the American Committee for Relief in the Near East—Barton, Peet, John H. T. Main, Harold A. Hatch, and Edward E. Moore—cabled Secretary of State Lansing from Constantinople with their opinion that “Turkey is politically, financially, morally bankrupt.” Regarding minorities, the telegram stated: “We believe that with independence definitely assured to each nationality as it becomes qualified to exercise self government control by a disinterested mandatory will be welcomed by an overwhelming majority of the people concerned.” United States of America. The National Archives (Washington, D.C.). Record Group 59: General Records of the Department of State (Decimal File, 1910–1929), 867.00/850 (Hereafter known as: U.S. Archives, RG 59.)

22 Grabill, , Protestant Diplomacy, p. 175.Google Scholar

23 Ibid., pp. 169–170.

24 Ralph, E. Cook, “The United States and the Armenian Question, 1894–1924” (Ph.D. dissertation, Fletcher School of Law and Diplomacy. 1957). p. 19.Google Scholar

25 James, H. Tashjian, “The American Military Mission to Armenia,” Armenian Review, II (Autumn, 1949), p. 59.Google Scholar

26 Thomas, A. Bryson III, “Woodrow Wilson and the Armenian Mandate: A Reassessment,” Armenian Review, XXI (Autumn, 1968), p. 19.Google Scholar

27 Papers of Frank, L. Polk, Yale University, Sterling Memorial Library, Box 81/187, 01 21, 1920: Box 81/188, 02 11, 1920; Box 81/188, 02 18, 1920; Box 81/188, 02 20, 1920; Box 81/188, 02 24, 1920; Box 81/188, 03 10, 1920; Box 81/188, 03 16, 1920.Google Scholar

28 Cook, , “The United States and the Armenian Question,” pp. 253–254.Google Scholar

29 Papers of Henry Cabot Lodge, Massachusetts Historical Society, Boston, December 13, 1920.

30 Ibid., December 16, 1920.

31 Thomas, A. Bryson III, “The Armenia America Society: A Factor in American–Turkish Relations, 1919–1924,” Armenian Review, XXIX (Spring, 1976), p. 54.Google Scholar

32 Ibid., p. 55. The following members constituted the AAS in April 1921: Walter George Smith (president), Hamilton Holt (secretary), Henry S. Huntington (acting treasurer), George R. Montgomery (director); Vice presidents: Robert Ellis Jones, Charles S. MacFarland, William N. Runyon, Stanley White, R. J. Caldwell (executive member). National Committee: Jane Addams, Mary M. Borglum, Arthur J. Brown, Caldwell, Henry Sloane Coffin, Homer Cummings, James H. Darlington, John H. Finley. James W. Gerard, Holt, Huntington, Jones, Henry C. King, MacFarland, Frank Mason North, William Cardinal O'Connell, Philip N. Rhinelander, Runyon, Smith, Oscar S. Straus, Henry Van Dyke, Benjamin Ide Wheeler, White, James Whitehead, John Sharp Williams, Stephen S. Wise, Leonard Wood, Mary E. Wooley.

33 Ibid.

34 Vahan, Cardashian, “Who Speaks in the Name of Armenia?” Armenian Review, XXIII (Autumn, 1970), p. 54.Google Scholar

35 Bryson, , “Armenia America Society,” pp. 54–55.Google Scholar

36 Walter, George Smith, “The Armenian Tragedy,” The Catholic World, CXI (07, 1920), p. 491.Google Scholar

37 Ernest W. Riggs initially conducted the AAS's daily affairs. Montgomery assumed the directorship when Riggs became the educational director of Near East Relief in late 1920.

38 Papers of Henry, Morgenthau, Library of Congress, Division of Manuscripts, Box 5, 12 23, 1920.Google Scholar

39 Howard, M. Sachar, The Emergence of the Middle East, 1914–1924 (New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1969). p. 214.Google Scholar

40 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 860J.40161 110.

41 Bryson, , “Armenia America Society,” p. 57.Google Scholar

42 Ibid., p. 59.

43 Ibid.

44 Cook, , “The United States and the Armenian Question,” pp. 305–307.Google Scholar

45 Bryson, , “Armenia America Society,” p. 57.Google Scholar

46 Cook, , “The United States and the Armenian Question,” pp. 306–307.Google Scholar

47 Vahan, Cardashian, “A 1921 Memorandum to the President on Armenia,” Armenian Review, XXVI (Summer, 1973), p. 53.Google Scholar

48 Grabill, , Protestant Diplomacy, p. 257.Google Scholar

49 Cook, , “The United States and the Armenian Question,” p. 293.Google Scholar

50 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 860J.4016P.81/179.

51 Ibid., 860J4016/96.

52 Ibid., 860J.4016/181.

53 Cook, , “The United States and Armenian Question,” p. 297.Google Scholar

54 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 867.4016/578; 867.4016/634.

55 Cook, , “The United States and the Armenian Question,” p. 309.Google Scholar

56 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 867.4016/813.

57 Ibid., 711.67119/2.

58 Ibid., 867.4016/869.

59 Ibid., 867.4016/894.

60 Ibid., 867.4016/877.

61 Harold, Nicolson, Curzon: The Last Phase, 1919–1925 (New York: Howard Fertig, 1974), p. 315.Google Scholar

62 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 867.4016/839.

63 Ibid., 867.4016/844.

64 Ibid., 867.4016/896.

65 Ibid., 867.4016/816.

66 Ibid., 867.4016/928.

67 Ibid., 860J.48/143.

68 Ibid., 860J.48/68; 860J.48/70; 860J.48/74; 860J.48/75.

69 Ibid., 860J.48/147.

70 Ibid., 860J.48/156.

71 On November 6, 1923, Allan W. Dulles of the Near Eastern Division described the National Delegation's representative, M. Vartan Malcolm, as “reasonable, sane and willing to be helpful” in an inner-department memorandum, contrasting his conduct with Cardashian's obstinacy (U.S. Archives, RG 59, 860J.48/158). Dulles had learned of the conflict between Malcolm and Cardashian earlier in the year. On January 4, 1923, he reported to Hughes on his meeting with Malcolm, disclosing the following: “I may add that Malcolm, who has always impressed me as being a rather intelligent Armenian, told me that he had called Cardashian to his office and told him that he had no right to continue to pose as the spokesman for an influential Armenian committee, that he represented only himself, and that he was doing the Armenian cause a great deal of harm.” (U.S. Archives, RG 59, 767.681 19TM-3/15).

72 Ibid., 860J.48/175.

73 Ibid., 860J.48/184.

74 Ibid., 860J.48/189.

75 Ibid., 860J.48/220; 860J.48/221.

76 Ibid., 867.00/944.

77 Ibid., 867.01/6.

78 Grabill, , Protestant Diplomacy, p. 260.Google Scholar

79 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 701.60J11/9.

80 Phillip, J. Baram, The Department of State in the Middle East, 1919–1945 (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1978), pp. 52–53.Google Scholar

81 U.S. Archives, RG.59, 860J.4016P.81/174.

82 Grabill, , Protestant Diplomacy, p. 272.Google Scholar

83 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 867.4016/823.

84 Ibid., 867.4016/888.

85 Ibid 867.4016/859; 867.4016/816a.

86 Ibid., 867.4016/817.

87 Ibid., 867.4016/816.

88 Ibid., 867.4016/922. One of the few voices of protest within the State Department came from C. Van H. Engert of the Near Eastern Division. On January 25, 1923, Engert submitted the following assessment to Dulles: “The Turk has succeeded in achieving precisely what he set out to do in 1915—nay, infinitely more than he dared hope—for he not only got rid of the Armenians but also of the Greeks, and that in spite of the crushing allied victories.” (867.4016/914). Regarding the rapprochement of Turkey and the United States, Engert advised Dulles on March 14, 1923: “Now by dealing with the Turks ‘as though nothing had happened,’ by appearing to shake hands with them, by haggling over ephemeral advantages, without taking into consideration American public opinion, we might lay ourselves open to criticism which it would be difficult to answer… We cannot afford to lower our standards of honor and morality to suit the political exigencies of the day.” (711.672/17).

89 Ibid., 767.681 19P/52.

90 Ibid., 711.672/183.

91 Cardashian, , “Who Speaks?” p. 52.Google Scholar

92 Cook, , “The United States and the Armenian Question,” p. 296.Google Scholar

93 Vahan, Cardashian, “Force and Diplomacy,” Armenian Review, XXII (Spring, 1969), p. 12.Google Scholar

94 Ibid., p. 16.

95 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 867.4016/921.

96 Ibid., 711.672/241.

97 John, A. DeNovo, American Interests and Policies in the Middle East. 1900–1939 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1963), p. 155.Google Scholar

98 Ibid., pp. 156–157.

99 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 71 l.672/225B.

100 James, W. Gerard, “The Chester Oil Concession and the Lausanne Treaty,” Armenian Review, XXVIII (Spring, 1975), p. 25. In April 1924, the ACIA circulated a pamphlet which scandalized Hughes' involvement with Standard Oil and the so-called Chester Concession. (Turkey had ratified the Chester Concession in 1923 but revoked it shortly after the pamphlet appeared.) The Chester Concession originally granted an American firm rights to build 2,500 miles of rail in the Ottoman Empire and exploit the subsoil resources within forty miles of the track. Conflicting claims by Britain, France, and the Soviet Union later complicated the arrangement and induced the Kemalists to abandon the scheme altogether. The ACIA alleged that Hughes backed the Chester Concession in order to secure drilling rights for Standard Oil.Google Scholar

101 Ibid., p. 29.

102 DeNovo, , American Interests, p. 159.Google Scholar

103 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 711.672/261.

104 Ibid., 711.672/187.

105 Ibid., 711.672/261.

106 Ibid., 711.672/213. Barton's support, however, was not without reservations. He asked Dulles if “it would be wise to threaten Turkey that we could conclude no treaty with her until justice were done to the Armenians.”

107 Ibid., 711.6727sol;480.

108 American Committee Opposed to the Lausanne Treaty, The Lausanne Treaty: Turkey and Armenia (New York: American Committee Opposed to the Lausanne Treaty, 1926), pp. 1–204.Google Scholar

109 DeNovo, , American Interests, pp. 164–165.Google Scholar

110 Ibid., p. 165.

111 U.S. Archives, RG 59, 711.672, Protests/l-51.

112 Barton, , Near East Relief, pp. 149–150.Google Scholar

113 Roger, R. Trask, United States Response to Turkish Nationalism and Reform, 1914–1939 (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1971), p. 148.Google Scholar