Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-xbtfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-08T04:45:30.816Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Diner Versus the Ducat

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2009

Jere L. Bacharach
Jere L. Bacharach
Affiliation:
University of Washington, Seattle, Washington
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Since the Second World War, United States currency has been accepted in almost every country in the world, and in many locations the ‘George Washington’ dollar has been in greater demand than local monies. In ancient, medieval and modern times, other currencies have had a similar success. Examples of this phenomenon are the ancient Athenian silver ‘owl’, the Byzantine gold solidus, the Florentine gold florin, and the Maria Theresa silver taler. In the late fourteenth century A.D. the florin was replaced by the gold coin of Venice, the ducat, as the ‘dollar of the Middle Ages’; that is, the international currency par excellence. The position of the ducat was associated with the international trading position of Venice as well as the fact that ‘the Venetian ducato, which was first coined in 1284, kept both its weight and fineness remarkably intact up to the end of the Venetian Republic’. The ducat's domination of the Eastern Mediterranean money market led to the appearance of a series of imitations, including Islamic imitations which were produced in response to the introduction of ducats into the internal economy of Mamluk Egypt. All the accounts based on Arabic sources date the domination of the ducat in the Mamluk market from a.h. 801/a.d. 1399. These same sources describe the various attempts by Mamluk sultans to meet the challenge of the ducat by coining imitations. Their efforts culminated in the ashrafî, first issued in 829/1425, which successfully replaced the ducat as the principal gold currency of the Mamluk Empire until the Ottoman conquest of 922/1517.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Middle East Studies , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 77 - 96
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 77 note 1 Cipolla, Carlo M., Money, Prices and Civilization in the Mediterranean World (Princeton, 1956), pp. 13–26.Google Scholar An excellent introduction to medieval banking and the money market is de Roover, Raymond, Money, Banking and Credit in Medieval Bruges (Cambridge, Mass., 1948).Google Scholar

page 77 note 2 For a general discussion of imitations of the ducat see Ives, Herbert E., The Venetian Gold Ducat and Its Imitations, edited and annotated by Grierson, Philip (New York, 1954).Google Scholar

page 77 note 3 van Gennep, A. Raugé, ‘Le ducat vénitien en Égypte, son influence sur le monnayage de l'or dans ce pays au commencement du XVe siècle’, Revue Numismatique, ser. 4, vol. 1 (1897), pp. 373–81, 494–508.Google Scholar

page 78 note 1 Balog, Paul, ‘The Coinage of the Mamluk Sultans of Egypt and Syria’, American Numismatic Society, Numismatic Studies, no. 12 (New York, 1964), pp. 39–49.Google Scholarde Bouard, Michel, ‘Sur l'Évolution monetaire de l'Égypte médiévale’, L'Egypte Contemporaine, vol. 30 (1939), pp. 427–59.Google ScholarCasanova, Paul, ‘Note sur le dinar ifrinti’, Revue Numismatique, ser. 4, vol. 1 (1897), pp. 535–6.Google ScholarLabib, Subhi Y., Handelsgeschichte Ägyptens im Spätmittelalter (Wiesbaden, 1965), pp. 423–35.Google ScholarDarrag, Ahmad, L'Égypte sous le règne de Barsbay (Damascus, 1961), pp. 91–107.Google ScholarPopper, William, ‘Egypt and Syria under the Circassian Sultans, 1382–1468 a.d.’, University of California Publications in Semitic Philology, vol. 16 (1957), pp. 41–51.Google ScholarAshtor, Eliayhu, Histoire des prix et des salaires dans l'orient médiéval (Paris, 1969), pp. 274–82, 388–92.Google ScholarLopez, Robert, Miskimin, Harry and Udovitch, Abraham, ‘England to Egypt, 1350–1500: Long-term Trends and Long-Distance Trade’, Studies in the Economic History of the Middle East from the Rise of Islam to the Present Day, ed. Cook, M. A. (London, 1970), pp. 117–28.Google Scholar

page 78 note 2 Cipolla, p. 24.Google Scholar

page 78 note 3 Balog, p. 43; Lopez, p. 125.Google Scholar

page 78 note 4 Lopez, pp. 125–6.Google Scholar

page 78 note 5 ‘Gresham's Law was not the invention of Sir Thomas Gresham, but of Henry D. MacLeod, a nineteenth century economist'(de Roover, Raymond, Gresham on Foreign Exchange (Cambridgse, Mass., 1949), p. 91).Google Scholar

page 79 note 1 Iskendar, Tewfik, ‘Les relations commerciales et politiques de Venise avec l'Égypte au XIVe et XVe siècles’, Position de Thèses, École Nationale des Chartes (Paris, 1953), pp. 94–6.Google ScholarLane, Frederic, Andrea Barbarigo, Merchant of Venice (Baltimore, 1944), p. 77.Google Scholar

page 79 note 2 An isolated figure for the Ayyubid mint cannot be used for generalization purposes. Owens, Charles, ‘Scandal in the Egyptian Treasury’, JNES, vol. 14 (1955), pp. 75–6.Google Scholar

page 79 note 3 Grierson, Philip, ‘La Moneta Veneziana nell'Economia Mediterranea del Trecento e Quattrocento’, La Civiltà Venezian del Quattrocento (Florence, 1957), pp. 86, 97.Google Scholar

page 79 note 4 Darrag, p. 96.Google Scholar

page 79 note 5 The standard account for medieval Mediterranean trade can be found in Heyd, Wilhelm, Histoire du commerce du Levant au moyen âge, trans. Raynaud, Furcy (2 vols., Leipzig, 1885–6).Google Scholar

page 80 note 1 Popper, pp. 45–7. For a complete list of exchange rates for the ducat, Bacharach, Jere L., ‘A Study of the Correlation between Textual Sources and Numismatic Evidence for Mamluk Egypt and Syria, a.h. 784–872/a.d. 1382–1468’, unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Michigan (Ann Arbor, 1967), pp. 326–340.Google Scholar

page 80 note 2 Wüstenfeld, Ferdinand, Chroniken der Stadt Mekke (Leipzig, 1859), vol. 2, pp. 316–19.Google Scholar

page 80 note 3 Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 512; Nujûm, vol. 6, p. 596.Google Scholar

page 80 note 4 Examples of the outlawing of the ducat are the following: 818/1415 – al-'Aynî, vol.4, p. 408; Sulûk, vol. 4, pp. 169; Nujûm, vol. 6, p. 351; 819/1416 – Suliûk, vol. 4, p. 196; 821/1418– al-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 464; Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 282; Inbâ', vol. 2, p. 134, a; al-Jawharî, p. 99, a; 823/1420 – Inbâ', vol. 2 p. 158, b.Google Scholar

page 80 note 5 The weights of the Bahrî dinars are listed in Balog. The degree of fineness was determined in an unpublished study by this author.Google Scholar

page 80 note 6 Sulûk, vol. 3, p. 9, a; Nujûm, vol.5, p. 597.Google Scholar

page 81 note 1 Sulûk, vol.3, p. 10, a; Inbâ, vol. 1 p. 466.Google Scholar

page 82 note 1 Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 196.Google Scholar

page 82 note 2 Popper, pp. 51–67. A full discussion of the problem of gold–silver exchange rates can be found in Jère L. Bacharach, ‘Circassian Monetary Policy: Silver’, Numismatic Chronicle, 1971.Google Scholar

page 82 note 3 See note 4, p. 80.Google Scholar

page 83 note 1 Al-Qalqashandî, vol.3, p. 441.Google Scholar

page 83 note 2 Lapidus, Ira M., Muslim Cities in the Later Middle Ages (Cambridge, Mass., 1967), pp. 116–42.Google Scholar

page 84 note 1 See note 4, p. 80.Google Scholar

page 84 note 2 Popper, p. 45.Google Scholar

page 84 note 3 Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 149.Google Scholar

page 84 note 4 Sulûh, vol.3, p. 89, a.Google Scholar

page 85 note 1 al-‘Aynî, vol. 4, p. 397. Other references to the scarcity of the harja, Sulûk, vol. 4, pp. 370, 605, 737.Google Scholar

page 85 note 2 Sulûk, vol.3, 25, 2; Ibn Qâdî Shuhba, p. 177, b.Google Scholar

page 85 note 3 al-Qalqashandî, vol. 3, p. 441; al-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 323; Balog, pp. 279–80.Google Scholar

page 85 note 4 al-Qalqashandî, vol. 3, p. 441.Google Scholar

page 85 note 5 al-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 322.Google Scholar

page 86 note 1 Balog, pp. 300–1. Tests by this author of a similar coin in the Dâr al-Kutub (Khedival) collection found the coin, number 679, to weigh about 4.3 grams.Google Scholar

page 86 note 2 Al-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 464; Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 282; Inbâ', vol. 2, p. 134, a; al-Jawharî, 99, a.Google Scholar

page 86 note 3 Al-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 323.Google Scholar

page 86 note 4 Balog, p. 280.Google Scholar

page 86 note 5 For weights, Balog, pp. 280–1. For degree of fineness, Bacharach, Study, pp. 357–60.Google Scholar

page 87 note 1 Al-'Aynî, vol. 4, pp. 322–3; Sulûk, vol.3, p. 89, a.Google Scholar

page 87 note 2 Balog, pp. 299–300; Bacharach, Study, pp. 357–60.Google Scholar

page 87 note 3 A1-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 438; Inbâ', vol.2, p. 109, b; Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 150.Google Scholar

page 87 note 4 Sulûk, vol. 4, pp. 150–1..Google Scholar

page 87 note 5 A1-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 402; Inbâ', vol.2, p. 77, b.Google Scholar

page 88 note 1 Inbâ', vol. 2, p. 223, b; Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 512; Nujûm, vol. 6, p. 596.Google Scholar

page 88 note 2 Hawâdith, p. 473; Iyâs, Ibn, vol. 2, p. 40; Ibn Iyâs, Unpublished Pages, p. 7.Google Scholar

page 88 note 3 Wiet, Gaston, ‘L'Égypte Arabe’, Histoire de la nation égyptienne, ed. Hanotaux, Gabriel (Paris, n.d.), vol. 4, P. 446.Google Scholar

page 88 note 4 Darrag, p. 259.Google Scholar

page 88 note 5 Nujûm, vol.6, p. 626.Google Scholar

page 89 note 1 829/1425 - Sulûk, vol. 4, pp. 512, 516, 524; Nujûm, vol. 6, p. 596; Inbâ', vol. 2, p. 223, b; 831/1427 – Inbâ', vol. 2, p. 240, b.Google Scholar

page 89 note 2 An isolated reference for the year 830/1427 indicates that the ashrafî was worth about 214 trade dirhams or 97 per cent of the value of the ducat; this would accurately reflect the difference in weight (gold content) between the two coins (Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 555). Dr Balog discovered two harja-style dinars from the reign of Barsbây for the years a.h. 829 and 830 (Balog, p. 398).Google Scholar

page 89 note 3 Bacharach, Study, p. 360.Google Scholar

page 89 note 4 Beldicianu, Nicoaro, Actes de Mehmed II et de Bayezid II du MS Fonds Turc ancien 39 (Paris, 1960), vol. 2, p. 156.Google Scholar

page 89 note 5 Ayalon, David, ‘The System of Payment in Mamluk Military Society’, JESHO, vol. 1 (1957), p. 273.Google Scholar

page 90 note 1 An interesting development took place during the reign of al-Mansûr 'Uthmân (857/1453) when a gold coin, called the Mansûrî, was minted. According to the textual sources it was supposed to weigh I dirham and have an exchange rate equal to 88 per cent of the ashrafî. This coin would have represented the logical sequence of weight reductions for the Muslim coins and would have placed the weights of the Muslim gold coins back into a Muslim standard. However, the numismatic evidence is contradictory as to what was the intended weight of the Mansûrî and the reign too short for any real program to develop. (Hawâdith, p. 186; Ibn Iyâs, vol. 2, p. 37; Ibn Iyâs, Unpublished Pages, p. 7; Balog, p. 328.)Google Scholar

page 90 note 2 Fetter, Frank W., ‘Some Neglected Aspects of Gresham's Law’, Quarterly journalof Economics, vol. 66 (1931–1932), p. 487.Google Scholar

page 92 note 1 Lapidus, Ira M., ‘The Grain Economy of Mamluk Egypt’, JESHO, vol. 12 (1969), pp. 1–15.Google Scholar

page 92 note 2 Smith, John M., ‘The Silver Coinage of Mongol Iran’, JESHO, vol. 12 (1969), pp. 16–41; Bacharach, in Numismatic Chronicle, 1971.Google Scholar

page 92 note 3 A return to the traditional Muslim weight standard was advocated by a Syrian, al-Asadî, in 855/1451 (al-Asadî, , al-Taysîr…, ed. al-Qādir, 'Abd (Cairo, 1968), p. 129).Google Scholar

page 93 note 1 Ives, p. 5 n. 12.Google Scholar

page 93 note 2 Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 149; a1-Qalqashandî, vol. 3, p. 441; Anon.Google Scholar (Ps.-Chiarini), Libro di Mercatantie et Usanze de' Paesi, ed. Bollandi, Franco (Turin, 1936), p. 81.Google Scholar

page 94 note 1 Islamic weights are discussed in detail in Hinz, Walther, Islamische Masse und Gewichte (Leiden, 1955).Google Scholar

page 94 note 2 Al-Qalqashandî, vol. 3, p. 441.Google Scholar

page 94 note 3 The numerous definitions of the ‘dirham’ are analysed in Bacharach, Numismatic Chronicle.Google Scholar

page 94 note 4 Ives, p. 5.Google Scholar

page 94 note 5 Al-'Aynî, vol. 4, p. 464; Inbâ', vol. 2, p. 134, a; Sulûk, vol. 4, p. 282.Google Scholar

page 95 note 1 Uzzano, Giovanni di Antonio da, ‘La Practica della Mercatura, 1442’, Della Decima, ed. Pagnini, Giovanni Grancesco (Lisbon, 1767), vol. 4, p. 113.Google Scholar

page 95 note 2 Bacharach, Study, pp. 352–55.Google Scholar

page 95 note 3 Ibid. p. 352.

page 95 note 4 Al-Qalqashandî, vol. 3, p. 441.Google Scholar