Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T17:30:58.411Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Study of effective permittivity for a multilayer substrate dipole antenna

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 November 2020

Julien Moussa H. Barakat Open the ORCID record for Julien Moussa H. Barakat [Opens in a new window]  and
Fabien Ndagijimana
Julien Moussa H. Barakat*
Affiliation:
College of Engineering and Technology, American University of the Middle East, Kuwait
Fabien Ndagijimana
Affiliation:
G2Elab, Grenoble Alpes University, Grenoble, France
*
Author for correspondence: Julien Moussa H. Barakat, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The design of integrated systems requires the knowledge of the values of the effective permittivity of the substrate. Designing antenna using computer-aided design tools is a long process that necessitates doing iterative steps to find the correct dimensions that meet specific requirements at a certain operating frequency. The objective of this work is to propose an analytic model to reduce the time required for the design. By using electromagnetic simulation, the effect of the relative permittivity and the height of the substrate on the final effective permittivity have been studied. An analytic model that helps the designer in estimating the value of the effective permittivity has been proposed.

Keywords

Dipole antennaseffective dielectric permittivityintegrated circuitsrelative permittivitymultilayer substrate
Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 13 , Issue 9 , November 2021 , pp. 915 - 920
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kobayashi, H, Takaoka, S, Kawamura, R, Cui, Y and Yamaguchi, Y (2014) Permittivity estimation of multilayered dielectrics by wall-thru radar image. Proceedings of ISAPC, Kaohsiung, Taiwan, pp. 123–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, B, Cho, J, Cheon, C and Kwon, Y (2005) Nondestructive measurement of complex permittivity and permeability using multilayered coplanar waveguide structures. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 15, 381–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysight Technologies (2015) Basics of Measuring the Dielectric Properties of Materials. Published in USA, 3 January 2019, 5989-2589EN. Available at https://www.keysight.com/zz/en/assets/7018-01284/application-notes/5989-2589.pdf.Google Scholar
Seiler, P, Klein, B and Plettemeir, D (2015) Analytical and experimental investigation of substrate permittivity and loss up to 67 GHz. ECTI Transactions on Electrical Engineering, Electronics and Communications 13, 26–34.Google Scholar
Petrović, VV and Mančić, ŽJ (2015) Calculation of effective permittivity of transmission lines with multilayered medium by using weak FEM formulation of the third order. Proceedings of 12th TELSIKS, Nis, Serbia, pp. 346–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boughriet, A, Legrand, C and Chapoton, A (1997) Noniterative stable transmission/reflection method for low-loss material complex permittivity determination. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 45, 52–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tseng, VF and Xie, H (2014) Increased multilayer fabrication and RF characterization of a high-density stacked MIM capacitor based on selective etching. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 61, 2302–2308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parhami, P, Rahmat-Samii, Y and Mittra, R (1980) An efficient approach for evaluating the Sommerfeld integrals encountered in the current element radiating over lossy ground. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation AP-28, 100–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kwak, S.I., Sim, D, Kwon, JH and Yun, JH (2009) Design of multilayer PIFA based on an EBG structure for SAR reduction in mobile applications. Proceedings of the Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Singapore, pp. 645–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balanis, C. A. (2005) Antenna Theory, Analysis and Design 3rd Edn. New York, NY, USA: Wiley-Interscience, pp. 210–471, ISBN 978-0-471-71462-0.Google Scholar
Rana, I and Alexopoulos, N (1981) Current distribution and input impedance of printed dipoles. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 29, 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kogure, H, Kogure, Y and Rautio, JC (2011) Introduction to Antenna Analysis Using EM Simulators. Norwood, MA, USA: Artech House, pp. 177–178, ISBN 9781608071586.Google Scholar
Obeidat, KA, Raines, BD and Rojas, RG (2010) Discussion of series and parallel resonance phenomena in the input impedance of antennas. Radio Science 45, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rialet, D Sharaiha, A, Tarot, A and Delaveaud, C (2009) Characterization of antennas on dielectric and magnetic substrates effective medium approximation. Proceedings of the 3rd EuCAP, Berlin, Germany, pp. 3163–3166.Google Scholar
Barakat J Moussa, (2008) Dispositif Radiofréquence Millimétrique pour Objets Communicants de type Smart Dust. (PhD thesis). Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble, France, Available at https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-00258878/document.Google Scholar
Tendeku, F and Misra, D (1994) Measurement of complex permittivity of materials using an open-ended coaxial probe: test of an analytic model. Proceedings of Conference on Precision Electromagnetic Measurements Digest, Boulder, CO, USA, pp. 63–64. doi: 10.1109/CPEM.1994.333290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghalichechian, N and Sertel, K (2015) Permittivity and loss characterization of SU-8 films for mmW and terahertz applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 14, 723–726. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2014.2380813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K-F, Ho, K and Dahele, J (1984) Circular-disk microstrip antenna with an air gap. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 32, 880–884.Google Scholar
Kraszewski, A (1977) Prediction of the dielectric properties of two phases mixtures. Journal of Microwave Power 12, 216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavageau, C (2005) Utilisation des technologies CMOS SOI 130 nm pour des applications en gamme de fréquences millimétriques. (PhD thesis). Université des Sciences et Technologies de Lille, December 2005.Google Scholar
Fu, Y, Vuong, TP, Dussopt, L and Ndagijimana, F (2011) Characterization of integrated antennas at millimeter-wave frequencies. Proceedings of 5th EUCAP, Rome, Italy, pp. 160–163.Google Scholar
Bunea, AC, Neculoiu, D and Muller, A (2011) Analytic and electromagnetic investigation of millimeter wave membrane supported CPWs processed on high resistivity silicon. The Romanian Journal of Information Science and Technology 14, 269–283.Google Scholar
Barakat, J Moussa, Delaveaud, C and Ndagijimana, F (2010) 60 GHz High resistivity silicon on insulator interdigitated dipole antenna. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 52, 1197–1201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barakat, J Moussa, Delaveaud, C and Ndagijimana, F (2011) Radiation measurement of 60 GHz high resistivity silicon on insulator double slot antenna. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 53, 2861–2865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar