Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T10:32:24.025Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Radio bearing of sources with directional antennas in urban environment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2018

Cezary Ziółkowski
Affiliation:
Institute of Telecommunications, Faculty of Electronics, Military University of Technology, Gen. Witold Urbanowicz St. No. 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
Jan M. Kelner*
Affiliation:
Institute of Telecommunications, Faculty of Electronics, Military University of Technology, Gen. Witold Urbanowicz St. No. 2, 00-908 Warsaw, Poland
*
Author for correspondence: Jan M. Kelner, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

This paper focuses on assessing the limitations in the direction-finding process of radio sources with directional antennas in an urbanized environment, demonstrating how signal source antenna parameters, such as beamwidth and maximum radiation direction affect bearing accuracy in non-line-of-sight conditions. These evaluations are based on simulation studies, which use measurement-tested signal processing procedures. These procedures are based on a multi-elliptical propagation model, the geometry of which is related to the environment by the power delay profile or spectrum. The probability density function of the angle of arrival for different parameters of the transmitting antenna is the simulation result. This characteristic allows assessing the effect of the signal source antenna parameters on bearing error. The obtained results are the basis for practical correction bearing error and these show the possibility of improving the efficiency of the radio source location in the urbanized environment.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Schmidt, RO (1986) Multiple emitter location and signal parameter estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 34(3), 276280.Google Scholar
2.Friedlander, B (1989) A sensitivity analysis of the MUSIC algorithm, in 1989 International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Glasgow, UK, 1989, (4), 2811–2814.Google Scholar
3.Friedlander, B (1990) A sensitivity analysis of the MUSIC algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 38(10), 17401751.Google Scholar
4.Jäntti, TP (1992) The influence of extended sources on the theoretical performance of the MUSIC and ESPRIT methods: narrow-band sources, 1992 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing (ICASSP), San Francisco, CA, USA, 1992, (2), 429–432.Google Scholar
5.Ng, BP, Er, MH and Kot, C (1994) Array gain/phase calibration techniques for adaptive beamforming and direction finding. IEE Proceedings – Radar, Sonar and Navigation 141(1), 2529.Google Scholar
6.de Jong, YLC and Herben, MHAJ (1999) High-resolution angle-of-arrival measurement of the mobile radio channel. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 47(11), 16771687.Google Scholar
7.Astely, D and Ottersten, B (1999) The effects of local scattering on direction of arrival estimation with MUSIC. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 47(12), 32203234.Google Scholar
8.Saraç, U, Harmanci, FK and Akgül, T (2008) Experimental analysis of detection and localization of multiple emitters in multipath environments. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 50(5), 6170.Google Scholar
9.Roy, R and Kailath, T (1989) ESPRIT-estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing 37(7), 984995.Google Scholar
10.Asztely, D and Ottersten, B (1998) The effects of local scattering on direction of arrival estimation with MUSIC and ESPRIT, in 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), Seattle, WA, USA, 1998, (6), 3333–3336.Google Scholar
11.Paulraj, A, Roy, R and Kailath, T (1986) A subspace rotation approach to signal parameter estimation. Proceedings of the IEEE 74(7), 10441046.Google Scholar
12.Fessler, JA and Hero, AO (1994) Space-alternating generalized expectation-maximization algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 42(10), 26642677.Google Scholar
13.Fleury, BH et al. (1999) Channel parameter estimation in mobile radio environments using the SAGE algorithm. IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications 17(3), 434450.Google Scholar
14.Taparugssanagorn, A et al. (2007) Impact of channel sounder phase noise on directional channel estimation by space-alternating generalised expectation maximisation. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 1(3), 803808.Google Scholar
15.Wallace, JW and Jensen, MA (2009) Sparse power angle spectrum estimation. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 57(8), 24522460.Google Scholar
16.Tsao, J and Steinberg, BD (1988) Reduction of sidelobe and speckle artifacts in microwave imaging: The CLEAN technique. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 36(4), 543556.Google Scholar
17.Ziółkowski, C and Kelner, JM (2015) Geometry-based statistical model for the temporal, spectral, and spatial characteristics of the land mobile channel. Wireless Personal Communications 83(1), 631652.Google Scholar
18.Ziółkowski, C and Kelner, JM (2015) Estimation of the reception angle distribution based on the power delay spectrum or profile. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 2015, e936406.Google Scholar
19.Ziółkowski, C (2015) Statistical model of the angular power distribution for wireless multipath environments. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 9(3), 281289.Google Scholar
20.Ziółkowski, C and Kelner, JM (2017) Antenna pattern in three-dimensional modelling of the arrival angle in simulation studies of wireless channels. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 11(6), 898906.Google Scholar
21.Ziółkowski, C and Kelner, JM (2018) Statistical evaluation of the azimuth and elevation angles seen at the output of the receiving antenna. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 66(4), 21652169.Google Scholar
22.Ziółkowski, C et al. (2017) Modeling the distribution of the arrival angle based on transmitter antenna pattern, 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Paris, France, 2017, 1582–1586.Google Scholar
23.Ziółkowski, C and Kelner, JM (2015) The influence of propagation environment on the accuracy of emission source bearing. Metrology and Measurement Systems 22(4), 591600.Google Scholar
24.Vaughan, R and Bach Andersen, J (2003) Channels, Propagation and Antennas for Mobile Communications. London, UK: Institution of Engineering and Technology.Google Scholar
25.Becker, K (1992) An efficient method of passive emitter location. IEEE Transactions on Aerospace and Electronic Systems 28(4), 10911104.Google Scholar
26.Ghilani, CD (2010) Adjustment Computations: Spatial Data Analysis, 5th edn. Hoboken, NJ, USA: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
27.Pedersen, KI, Mogensen, PE and Fleury, BH (2000) A stochastic model of the temporal and azimuthal dispersion seen at the base station in outdoor propagation environments. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 49(2), 437447.Google Scholar
28.Pedersen, KI, Mogensen, PE and Fleury, BH (1997) Power azimuth spectrum in outdoor environments. Electronics Letters 33(18), 15831584.Google Scholar
29.Ziółkowski, C and Kelner, JM (2016) Empirical models of the azimuthal reception angle—Part I: Comparative analysis of empirical models for different propagation environments. Wireless Personal Communications 91(2), 771791.Google Scholar
30.Abdi, A, Barger, JA and Kaveh, M (2002) A parametric model for the distribution of the angle of arrival and the associated correlation function and power spectrum at the mobile station. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology 51(3), 425434.Google Scholar
31.Ettus USRP B210 information sheet, Ettus Research. [Online]. Available at: https://www.ettus.com/content/files/b200-b210_spec_sheet.pdf.Google Scholar
32.GNU Radio. [Online]. Available at: https://gnuradio.org/.Google Scholar
33.Xiaobo, A, et al. (2002) A single channel correlative interferometer direction finder using VXI receiver, in 2002 3rd International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Beijing, China, 2002, 1158–1161.Google Scholar
34.Struckman, KA and Martel, RT (2008) Multipath resolving correlation interferometer direction finding, US 7358891B2.Google Scholar
35.Google Maps. [Online]. Available at: https://www.google.pl/maps/.Google Scholar
36.Agilent E4438C ESG vector signal generator. Data sheet, Keysight, 2012. [Online]. Available at: http://literature.cdn.keysight.com/litweb/pdf/5988-4039EN.pdf.Google Scholar
37.WR-430 Waveguide Standard Gain Horn Antenna Operating From 1.7 to 2.6 GHz With a Nominal 10 dBi Gain With CPR-430F Flange, Pasternack. The engineer's RF source. [Online]. Available: https://www.pasternack.com/standard-gain-horn-waveguide-size-wr430-pe9864-10-p.aspx.Google Scholar
38.Test Receiver R&S FSET7, R&S FSET22, RF Preselector R&S FSET-Z2, R&S FSET-Z22,” Rohde & Schwarz. [Online]. Available at: https://www.rohde-schwarz.com/.Google Scholar
39.GaGe 16-Bit PCIe Gen3 RazorMax Express. Data sheet,” GaGe. [Online]. Available: http://www.gage-applied.com/digitizers/GaGe-Digitizer-RazorMaxExpressCS-PCIe-Data-Sheet.pdf.Google Scholar
40.Google Earth. [Online]. Available at: https://www.google.com/earth/.Google Scholar
41.Salous, S. (2013) Radio Propagation Measurement and Channel Modelling. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.Google Scholar
42.Yin, X and Cheng, X (2015) Propagation Channel Characterization, Parameter Estimation, and Modeling for Wireless Communications. Singapore: Wiley-IEEE Press.Google Scholar
43.Bronshtein, IN et al. (2007) Handbook of Mathematics, 5th edn. Berlin, Germany; New York, NJ, USA: Springer.Google Scholar