Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T04:32:00.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Polarization-independent single-layer ultra-wideband frequency-selective surface

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2015

Ramprabhu Sivasamy ,
Balaji Moorthy ,
Malathi Kanagasabai ,
Jithila V. George ,
Livya Lawrance  and
Dinesh Babu Rajendran
Ramprabhu Sivasamy*
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai – 600025, India. Phone: +919943120420 Department of ECE, SSN College of Engineering, Kalavakkam, Chennai – 603110, India
Balaji Moorthy
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai – 600025, India. Phone: +919943120420
Malathi Kanagasabai
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai – 600025, India. Phone: +919943120420
Jithila V. George
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai – 600025, India. Phone: +919943120420
Livya Lawrance
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai – 600025, India. Phone: +919943120420
Dinesh Babu Rajendran
Affiliation:
Department of ECE, College of Engineering Guindy, Anna University, Chennai – 600025, India. Phone: +919943120420
*
Corresponding author: R. Sivasamy Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An ultra-wideband (UWB) frequency-selective surface (FSS) exhibiting band rejection characteristic is presented in this paper. The proposed unit cell has the size of 14 × 14 mm2 which is approximately 0.18 × 0.18 λo, where λo corresponds to free space wavelength at the lower cut-off frequency. The proposed UWB FSS consists of a single-layer substrate and provides 20 dB attenuation level for a wide bandwidth of 7.53 GHz at the normal incidence. The proposed FSS is polarization independent and also provides angular-independent operation for the EM wave incidences of 15°, 30° and 45° with 11.5 dB attenuation over a wide range from 4 to 14 GHz.

Keywords

Electromagnetic CompatibilityFilters
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , February 2017 , pp. 93 - 97
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Munk, B.A.: Frequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design, Wiley Interscience, NY, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Parker, E.A.: The gentleman's guide to frequency selective surfaces, in 17th Q.M.W. Antenna Symp., 1991.Google Scholar
[3] Chiu, C.N.; Kuo, C.H.; Lin, M.S.: Bandpass shielding enclosure design using multipole-slot arrays for modern portable digital devices. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 50 (4) (2008), 895–904.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4] Syed, I.S.; Ranga, Y.; Matekovits, L.; Esselle, K.P.; Hay, S.G.: A single-layer frequency-selective surface for ultra wideband electromagnetic shielding. IEEE Trans. Electromagn. Compat., 56 (6) (2014), 1404–1411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Costa, F.; Genovesi, S.; Monorchio, A.: On the bandwidth of high-impedance frequency selective surfaces. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 8 (2009), 1341–1344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Huang, H.-F.; Zhang, S.-F.; Hu, Y.-H.: A novel frequency selective surface for ultra wideband antenna performance improvement. Proc. Int. Symp. on Antennas & Propagation (ISAP), vol. 2 2013, 965–968.Google Scholar
[7] Ranga, Y.; Matekovits, L.; Esselle, K.P.; Weily, A.R.: Multioctave frequency selective surface reflector for ultra wideband antennas. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 10 (2011), 219–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Li, W.-L.; Yang, G.-H.; Zhang, T.; Wu, Q.: A novel frequency selective surface with ultra-wideband polarization selective response, in IEEE Int. Conf. on Communication Technology (ICCT), Nanjing University of Post and Telecommunications Nanjing, China, 2010, 1315–1318.Google Scholar
[9] Kushwaha, N.; Kumar, R.; Ram Krishna, R.V.S.; Oli, T.: Design and analysis of new compact UWB frequency selective surface and its equivalent circuit. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C, 46 (2014), 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Li, W.; Zhang, T.; Yang, G.; Wu, Q.; Hua, J.: Novel Frequency Selective Surfaces with compact structure and ultra-wideband response, in Asia-Pacific Symp. on Electromagnetic Compatibility (APEMC), 2012, 557–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Baisakhiya, S.; Sivasamy, R.; Kanagasabai, M.; Periaswamy, S.: Novel compact UWB frequency selective surface for angular and polarization independent operation. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett., 40 (2013), 71–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Parker, E.; El Sheikh, A.N.A.: Convoluted array elements and reduced size unit cells for frequency-selective surfaces. Proc. Inst. Electr. Eng. H (Microwaves, Optics and Antennas), 138 (1) (1991), 19–22.Google Scholar
[13] Arun, H.; Sarma, A.K.; Kanagasabai, M.; Velan, S.; Raviteja, C.; Alsath, M.: Deployment of modified serpentine structure for mutual coupling reduction in MIMO antennas. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 13 (2014), 277–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Sundarsingh, E.F.; Velan, S.; Kanagasabai, M.; Sarma, A.K.; Raviteja, C.; Alsath, M.G.N.: Polygon-shaped slotted dual-band antenna for wearable applications. IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. Lett., 13 (2014), 611–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar