Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:11:29.185Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

A miniaturized flexible frequency selective surface for dual band response

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 November 2020

Durai Kanchana*
Affiliation:
Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai603110, India
Sankararajan Radha
Affiliation:
Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai603110, India School of SENSE, VIT Chennai campus,Chennai, India
Balakrishnapillai Suseela Sreeja
Affiliation:
Sri Sivasubramaniya Nadar College of Engineering, Chennai603110, India
Esakkimuthu Manikandan
Affiliation:
School of SENSE, VIT Chennai campus,Chennai, India
*
Author for correspondence: Durai Kanchana, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, a novel miniaturized and flexible dual band frequency selective surface (FSS) is presented. This FSS provides effective shielding in X-band and Ku- band, with a frequency response of 9.4 and 16.7 GHz, respectively. The proposed FSS provides 924 MHz bandwidth at X-band and 1.34 GHz bandwidth at Ku-band with an insertion loss of 20 dB. Moreover, the proposed design is polarization-independent and it provides stable frequency response at various angles of incidences for both transverse electric and transverse magnetic modes. More significantly, the proposed FSS analyzed the bandstop response of the selective frequency and also is suitable for conformal applications. A prototype of the proposed FSS is fabricated. The measured results and simulated results are good in agreement.

Type
Metamaterials and Photonic Bandgap Structures
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Munk, BA (2000) Frequency Selective Surfaces: Theory and Design, 1st Edn. New York, NY, USA: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munk, BA (2003) Finite Antenna Arrays and FSS. Hoboken, NJ, USA: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haghzadeh, M and Akyurtlu, A (2016) All-printed, flexible, reconfigurable frequency selective surfaces. Journal of Applied Physics, 120, 184901. doi: 10.1063/1.4967169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nauman, M, Saleem, R, Rashid, AK and Shafique, MF (2016) A miniaturized flexible frequency selective surface for X-band applications. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility, 58, pp. 419428. doi: 10.1109/TEMC.2015.2508503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, S, Pan, T, Yan, Z, Dai, L, Peng, Y, Gao, M and Lin, Y (2019) Flexible serpentine like frequency selective surface for conformal applications with stable frequency response. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 18, 14771481. doi: 10.1109/LAWP.2019.2920369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewani, AA, O'Keefe, SG, Thiel, DV and Galehdar, A (2017) Optically transparent frequency selective surfaces on flexible thin plastic substrates. AIP Advances 5, 027107. doi: 10.1063/1.4907929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S-H, Kim, M-S, Kim, J-K, Lim, J-I and Hong, I-P (2018) Security paper design with frequency-selective structure for X-band electromagnetic detection system. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation, 18. doi: 10.1155/2018/9836937.Google Scholar
Sivasamy, R and Kanagasabai, M (2019) Design and fabrication of flexible FSS polarizer. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering. doi:10.1002/mmce.22002.Google Scholar
Mirza, H, Hossain, T Md, Soh, PJ, Jamlos, MF, Ramli, MN, Hassan, ES, Al‐Hadi, AA and Yan, S (2018) Single layered swastika-shaped flexible linear-to circular polarizer using textiles for S-band application. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 28, e21463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yong, WY, Rahim, SKA, Himdi, M, Seman, FC, Suong, DL, Ramli, MR and Elmobarak, HA (2018) Flexible convoluted ring shaped FSS for X-band screening application. IEEE Access, 6, pp. 1165711665. doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2804091.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marcuvitz, N. (1951) Waveguide Handbook. NewYork: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Sung, GHH, Kevin, S, Michael, N and Allan, W (2006) A frequency selective wall for interference reduction in wireless indoor environments. IEEE Antennas Propagation Magazine 48, 2937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, RJ and Parker, EA (1982) Equivalent circuit model for arrays of square loops. Electronics Letters 18, 294296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, CK and Langley, RJ (1985) Equivalent-circuit models for frequency selective surfaces at oblique angles of incidence. IEE Proc. H – Microwave Antennas Propagation 132, 395399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Costa, F, Monorchio, A and Manara, G (2012) Efficient analysis of frequency selective surfaces by a simple equivalent-circuit model. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 54, 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jha, KR, Singh, G and Jyoti, R (2012) A simple synthesis technique of single square-loop frequency selective surface. Progress In Electromagnetics Research B 45, 165185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reed, JA (1997) Frequency Selective Surfaces with Multiple Periodic Elements. (Ph.D. dissertation). University of Texas at Dallas, USA.Google Scholar
Parker, EA and El Sheikh, ANA (1991) Convoluted array elements and reduced size unit cells for frequency-selective surfaces. IEE Proceedings – H Microwave Antennas Propagation 138, 1922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar