Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T04:04:02.094Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A low-profile wideband circularly polarized MIMO antenna with pattern and polarization diversity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 October 2019

Prashant Chaudhary Open the ORCID record for Prashant Chaudhary [Opens in a new window] ,
Ashwani Kumar  and
B. K. Kanaujia Open the ORCID record for B. K. Kanaujia [Opens in a new window]
Prashant Chaudhary*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Science, University of Delhi South Campus, New Delhi110021, India
Ashwani Kumar
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics, Sri Aurobindo College, University of Delhi, New Delhi110017, India
B. K. Kanaujia
Affiliation:
School of Computational and Integrative Sciences, Jawaharlal Nehru University New Delhi, New Delhi110067, India
*
Author for correspondence: Prashant Chaudhary, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The present work describes a unique planar low-profile wideband circularly polarized Multiple-Input and Multiple-Output (MIMO) antenna operating in the X-band, with pattern and polarization diversity over the entire axial-ratio bandwidth (ARBW). The design is unique in the sense that a simple grounded stub introduced between two linearly polarized monopole antennas has been used to realize wideband circular polarization, pattern diversity, and high isolation between antennas. The ARBW of the MIMO antenna is 2.45 GHz (8.11–10.56) 3 dB and its impedance matching bandwidth is 3.52 GHz (8.07–11.59). The isolation is better than 20 dB. The antenna can be easily adapted to operate other frequency bands by simple frequency scaling. It has been fabricated on an FR-4 substrate and its performance has been compared against several existing available antennas.

Keywords

MIMOpattern diversitypolarization diversitycircular polarization (CP)wideband
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 12 , Issue 4 , May 2020 , pp. 316 - 322
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Malik, J, Patnaik, A and Kartikeyan, MV (2015) Novel printed MIMO antenna with pattern and polarization diversity. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 14, 739–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Sharma, Y, Sarkar, D, Saurav, K and Srivastava, KV (2016) Three-element MIMO antenna system with pattern and polarization diversity for WLAN applications. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 1163–1166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.Kharche, S, Reddy, GS, Gupta, RK and Mukherjee, J (2017) Wideband circularly polarized diversity antenna for satellite and mobile communication. IET Microwave Antennas Propagation 11, 1863–1869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Das, G, Sharma, A and Gangwar, RK (2018) Dielectric resonator based circularly polarized MIMO antenna with polarization diversity. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 60, 685–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Malik, J, Nagpal, D and Kartikeyan, MV (2016) MIMO antenna with omnidirectional pattern diversity. Electronics Letters 52, 102–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Zhu, J, Li, S, Feng, B and Yin, S (2016) Compact dual polarized UWB quasi-self-complementary MIMO/diversity antenna with band-rejection capability. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 905–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7.Yang, XM, Liu, XG, Zhou, XY and Cui, TJ (2012) Reduction of mutual coupling between closely packed patch antennas using waveguided metamaterials. IEEE Transaction on Antenna and Propagation 11, 389–391.Google Scholar
8.Expósito-Domínguez, G, Fernández-Gonzalez, J-M, Padilla, P and Sierra-Castañer, M (2012) Mutual coupling reduction using EBG in steering antennas. IEEE Transaction on Antenna and Propagation 11, 1265–1268.Google Scholar
9.Alibakhshikenar, M, Khalily, M, Virdee, BS, See, CH, Abd-Alhameed, RA and Limiti, E (2019) Mutual-coupling isolation using embedded metamaterial EM bandgap decoupling slab for densely packed array antennas. IEEE Access 7, 51828–51840.Google Scholar
10.Mao, C-X and Chu, Q-X (2014) Compact UWB-MIMO antenna with dual polarization. IEEE Transaction on Antenna and Propagation 62, 4474–4480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11.Chen, ZN, See, TSP and Qing, X (2008) Ultra-wideband antennas with miniaturized size, reduced, and enhanced diversity. International Workshop on Antenna Technology: Small Antennas and Novel Metamaterial, Chiba, Japan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12.See, TSP and Chen, ZN (2009) An ultrawideband diversity antenna. IEEE Transaction on Antenna and Propagation 57, 1597–1605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
13.Liu, L, Zhao, H, See, TSP and Chen, ZN (2006) A printed ultra-wideband diversity antenna. IEEE International Conference on Ultra-Wideband, Waltham, MA, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
14.Saurav, K, Mallat, NK and Antar, YMM (2018) A three-port polarization and pattern diversity ring antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 17, 1536–1225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
15.Ahn, C-H, Oh, S-W and Chang, K (2009) A dual-frequency omnidirectional antenna for polarization diversity of MIMO and wireless communication applications. IEEE Antenna and Wireless Propagation Letters 8, 996–969.Google Scholar
16.Malviya, L, Panigrahi, RK and Kartikeyan, MV (2017) A low profile planar MIMO antenna with polarization diversity for LTE 1800/1900 application. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59, 533–538.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17.Ghosh, S, Tran, T-N and Tho, L-N (2012) Miniaturized MIMO-PIFA with pattern and polarization diversity. Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC Spring), Yokohama, Japan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Jalali, M, Naser-Moghadasi, M and Sadeghzadeh, RA (2017) Dual circularly polarized multilayer MIMO antenna array with an enhanced SR-feeding network for C-band application. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19.Ghosh, CK and Parui, SK (2013) Reduction of mutual coupling between E-shaped microstrip antennas by using a simple microstrip I-section. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 55, 2544–2549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar