Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T01:34:14.648Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low-insertion-loss Gysel power combiner with high power density and high isolation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 April 2021

Song Guo
Affiliation:
EHF Key Lab of Fundamental Science, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu611731, China
Kaijun Song*
Affiliation:
EHF Key Lab of Fundamental Science, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu611731, China
Yong Fan
Affiliation:
EHF Key Lab of Fundamental Science, School of Electronic Science and Engineering, University of Electronic Science and Technology of China, Chengdu611731, China
*
Author for correspondence: Kaijun Song, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

A suspended-stripline Gysel low-insertion-loss power combiner is presented in this paper. The multi-layer cavity structure reduces the circuit size and increases power density, composed of suspended strip lines and coaxial lines. The transmission-line theory is used to analyze this proposed power combiner, and the equivalent circuit model is developed to investigate the characteristics and design of the power combiner. The measured input return loss is greater than 20 dB from 7.15 to 9.35 GHz. The measured insertion loss is less than 0.36 dB, and the power-combining efficiency is greater than 92% from 7.39 to 9.19 GHz. The maximum power-combining efficiency is 98.8% at 8.1 GHz. Besides, the measured isolation is greater than 20 dB from 7 to 10 GHz. The power capacity is analyzed, and the cross-sectional power density is greater than 3.57 kW/cm2. The measured and simulated results show reasonable agreement with each other.

Type
Passive Components and Circuits
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gysel, UH (1975) A New N-Way Power Divider/Combiner Suitable for High-Power Applications, in 1975 IEEE-MTT-S International Microwave Symposium, pp. 116118.Google Scholar
Becker, JP and Oudghiri, AM (2005) A planar probe double ladder waveguide power divider. IEEE Microwave & Wireless Components Letters 15, 168170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraizi, H and Sharifi, A-R (2009) Optimum design of a wideband two-way Gysel power divider with source to load impedance matching. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 57, 22382248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraizi, H and Sharifi, A-R (2011) Optimum design of asymmetrical multisection two-way power dividers with arbitrary power division and impedance matching. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 59, 14781490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraizi, H and Ayati, S-A (2011) Optimum design of broadband n-way rectangular power dividers with arbitrary power division and impedance matching. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 5, 1447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraizi, H and Ayati, SA (2012) Optimum design of a novel N-way planar power divider/combiner with impedance matching. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 6, 418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Q, Kang, Z, Wu, Q and Mo, D (2013) An in-phase output Ka-Band traveling-wave power divider/combiner using double ridge-waveguide couplers. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory & Techniques 61, 32473253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chu, Q, Mo, D and Wu, Q (2015) An isolated radial power divider via circular waveguide TE01-mode transducer. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 63, 39883996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, K, Hu, S, Zhang, F and Zhu, Y (2015) Four-way chained quasi-planar power divider using rectangular coaxial waveguide. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 25, 373375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, GL, Song, KJ, Zhang, F and Zhu, Y (2015) Novel four-Way multilayer SIW power divider with slot coupling structure. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 25, 799801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraizi, H and Yousefi, A (2017) Optimum design of a wideband planar N-way fork power divider with arbitrary power division and input-to-output impedance matching. AEU - International Journal of Electronics and Communications 79, 8393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, B, Zhang, Y, Zhao, Y, Zhang, W and He, L (2018) Compact nine-way power divider with omnidirectional resistor based on graphene flake. Microwave & Wireless Components Letters IEEE 28, 762764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, T, Tsai, J and Chang, Y (2018) A radial four-way power divider with the proposed isolation network. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 28, 194196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, S, Song, K, Zhou, Y and Fan, Y (2018) Compact ultra-wideband bandpass-response power divider with high-frequency selectivity. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 10, 11071112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, K, Mo, Y, Xue, Q and Fan, Y (2014) Wideband four-way out-of-phase slotline power dividers. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics 61, 35983606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, S, Song, K and Fan, Y (2020) Compact four-way suspended-stripline power divider with low loss and high isolation. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 12, 15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cano, JL, Mediavilla, A, Dragas, S and Tazon, A (2016) Novel broadband circular waveguide four-way power divider for dual polarization applications. IEEE Microwave & Wireless Components Letters 26, 98100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oraizi, H and Ayati, S-A. Optimum design of a modified 3-way Bagley rectangular power divider,” in 2010 10th Mediterranean Microwave Symposium, pp. 2528, IEEE, 2010/8/25 – 2010/8/27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shan, X and Shen, Z (2011) A suspended-substrate Ku-Band symmetric radial power combiner. IEEE Microwave & Wireless Components Letters 21, 652654.CrossRefGoogle Scholar