Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:50:36.421Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Low power front-end architecture dedicated to the multistandard simultaneous reception

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 January 2011

Ioan Burciu*
Affiliation:
University of Lyon, INRIA-CNRS, INSA-Lyon, CITI-INL, F-69621, France. Orange Labs, 28 Chemin du Vieux Chêne, 38243 Meylan Cedex, France.
Guillaume Villemaud
Affiliation:
University of Lyon, INRIA-CNRS, INSA-Lyon, CITI-INL, F-69621, France.
Jacques Verdier
Affiliation:
University of Lyon, INRIA-CNRS, INSA-Lyon, CITI-INL, F-69621, France.
Matthieu Gautier
Affiliation:
University of Lyon, INRIA-CNRS, INSA-Lyon, CITI-INL, F-69621, France. Orange Labs, 28 Chemin du Vieux Chêne, 38243 Meylan Cedex, France.
*
Corresponding author: I. Burciu Email: [email protected]

Abstract

In this paper, we address the architecture of multistandard simultaneous reception receivers and we aim to reduce the complexity and the power consumption of the analog front-end. To this end, we propose an architecture using the double orthogonal translation technique in order to multiplex two signals received on different frequency bands. A study case concerning the simultaneous reception of 802.11 g and Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) signals is developed in this article. Theoretical and simulation results show that this type of multiplexing does not significantly influence the evolution of the signal-to-noise ratio of the signals. In the same time a 30% reduction of the power consumption is expected as well as a significant reduction of the complexity.

Type
Original Article
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Evans, D.; Raynes, D.; Payne, A.: Development and Simulation of a Multi-standard MIMO Transceiver, FLOWS WP4 program, Deliverable Number: D20, IST-2001-32125, November 2004.Google Scholar
[2]Lee, S.-G.; Kim, N.-S.; Oh, S.-M.; Choi, J.-K.; Kim, S.-C.: A dual-band receiver architecture for PCS and IMT-2000, in IEEE Asia-Pacific Conf. on ASICs, August 2000, 235238. doi: 10.1109/APASIC.2000.896952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]McFarland, B.; Shor, A.; Tabatabaei, A.: A 2.4 & 5 GHz dual band 802.11 WLAN supporting data rates to 108 MB/s, in IEEE Gallium Arsenide Integrate Circuit Symp., October 2002, 114. doi: 10.1109/GAAS.2002.1049018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[4]Belot, D.; Bonhoure, B.; Saias, D.; Bertholet, N.: A DCS1800/GSM900 RF to digital fully integrated receiver in SiGe 0.35 um BiCMOS, in BIPOLAR/BiCMOS Circuits and Technology Meeting, October 2001, 8689. doi: 10.1109/BIPOL.2001.957863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5]Rampmeier, K.; Agarwal, B.; Mudge, P.; Yates, D.; Robinson, T.: A versatile receiver IC supporting WCDMA, CDMA and AMPS cellular handset applications, in IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symp., May 2001, 2124. doi: 10.1109/RFIC.2001.935633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Van Der Burgt, C.: Multi-band Receiver and Method Associated Therewith (Patent style), U.S. Patent 7120406, June 11, 2004.Google Scholar
[7]Burciu, I.; Gautier, M.; Villemaud, G.; Verdier, J.: Method for Processing Two Signals Received by a Single Terminal, WO/2010/031944, March 2010.Google Scholar
[8]Mak, I.; Seng.-Pan, U.; Martins, R.P.: Analog-Baseband Architecture and Circuits for Multistandard and Low Voltage Wireless Transceivers, Springer, 2007 (ISBN: 978-1-4020-6432-6).Google Scholar
[9]Rudell, J.C. et al. : A 1.9 GHz wide-band if double conversion CMOS integrated receiver for cordless telephone applications. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 32 (12) (1997), 20712088.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10]Rudell, J.C.: Frequency translation techniques for high-integration high-selectivity multi-standard wireless communication systems, Ph.D. dissertation, Dept. Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences, Berkeley Univ., 2000.Google Scholar
[11]Çetin, E.; Kale, İ.; Morling, R.C.S.: Adaptive self-calibrating image rejection receiver, in IEEE Communications Society, vol. 5, June 2004, 27312735. doi: 10.1109/ICC.2004.1313027.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12]Traverso, S.; Ariaudo, M.; Fijalkow, I.; Gautier, J.-L., Lereau, C.: Decision directed channel estimation and high I/Q imbalance compensation in OFDM receivers. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 57 (5) (2009), 12461249. doi: 10.1109/TCOMM.2009.05.070161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13]Widrow, B.; McCool, J.; Ball, M.: The complex LMS algorithm. Proc. IEEE, 64 ( 1975), 719720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14]Gantz, M.W.; Moses, R.L.; Wilson, S.L.: Convergence of the SMI and the diagonally loaded SMI algorithms with weak interference. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 38 (3) (1990), pp. 394399. doi: 10.1109/8.52247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15]Xiao, J.; Mehr, I.; Silva-Martinez, J.: A high dynamic range cmos variable gain amplifier for mobile DTV tuner. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 42 (2) (2007), pp. 298301. doi: 10.1109/JSSC.2006.889386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[16]Burciu, I.; Verdier, J.; Villemaud, G.: Low power multistandard simultaneous reception architecture, in European Wireless Technology Conf., September 2009.Google Scholar
[18]IEEE Computer Society: 802.11 g Part 11: Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) specifications, http://standards.ieee.org/getieee802/download/802.11g-2003.pdf, June 2003.Google Scholar
[19]3rd Generation Partnership Project: UMTS Physical layer procedures (TDD) (Release 8), http://www.3gp.org/ftp/Specs/htmlinfo/25224.htm, March 2008.Google Scholar
[20]Parkvall, S. et al. : LTE-advanced – evolving LTE towards IMT-advanced, in Vehicular Technology Conf., IEEE 68th, September 2008. doi: 10.1109/VETECF.2008.313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar