Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:51:58.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Implementation of tunable resonators in planar groove gap waveguide technology

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 April 2021

Titus Oyedokun*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
Riana H. Geschke
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa Fraunhofer Institute for High Frequency Physics and Radar Techniques FHR, Wachtberg, Germany
Tinus Stander
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical, Electronic and Computer Engineering, Carl and Emily Fuchs Institute for Microelectronics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa
*
Author for correspondence: Titus Oyedokun, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

We present a tunable planar groove gap waveguide (PGGWG) resonant cavity at Ka-band. The cavity demonstrates varactor loading and biasing without bridging wires or annular rings, as commonly is required in conventional substrate-integrated waveguide (SIW) resonant cavities. A detailed co-simulation strategy is also presented, with indicative parametric tuning data. Measured results indicate a 4.48% continuous frequency tuning range of 32.52–33.98 GHz and a Qu tuning range of 63–85, corresponding to the DC bias voltages of 0–16 V. Discrepancies between simulated and measured results are analyzed, and traced to process variation in the multi-layer printed circuit board stack, as well as unaccounted varactor parasitics and surface roughness.

Type
Metamaterials and Photonic Bandgap Structures
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Entesari, K, Saghati, AP, Sekar, V and Armendariz, M (2015) Tunable SIW structures: antennas, VCOs, and filters. IEEE Microwave Magazine 16, 3454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bozzi, M, Georgiadis, A and Wu, K (2011) Review of substrate-integrated waveguide circuits and antennas. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 5, 909920.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sirci, S, Martinez, J, Taroncher, M and Boria, V (2012) Analog tuning of compact varactor-loaded combline filters in substrate integrated waveguide. Proceeding of 42nd European Microwave Conference, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 2012, 257260.Google Scholar
Sirci, S, Martinez, JD, Taroncher, M and Boria, VE (2011) Varactor-loaded continuously tunable SIW resonator for reconfigurable filter design. Proceeding of 41st European Microwave Conference, Manchester, UK, 2011, 436439.Google Scholar
Anand, A, Small, J, Peroulis, D and Liu, X (2013) Theory and design of octave tunable filters With lumped tuning elements. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 61, 43534364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccleston, KW (2012) Mode analysis of the corrugated substrate integrated waveguide. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 60, 30043012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyedokun, T, Geschke, R and Stander, T (2017) Experimental characterisation of planar groove gap waveguide and cavity. Proceeding of 47th European Microwave Conference (EuMC), Nuremberg, Germany, 2017, 436439. doi: 10.23919/EuMC.2017.8230883.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berenguer, A, Fusco, V, Zelenchuk, DE, Sánchez-Escuderos, D, Baquero-Escudero, M and Boria-Esbert, VE (2016) Propagation characteristics of groove gap waveguide below and above cutoff. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 64, 2736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyedokun, T, Geschke, RH and Stander, T (2020) Broadband mm-wave propagation characterization of planar groove gap waveguide. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 62, 18711875.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, W, Schaefer, D, Bruni, S, Campo, AM, Litschke, O, Otto, S and Holzwarth, S (2019) “Highly Integrated Ka-Band Frontend Module for SATCOM and 5G,” IEEE Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC), Singapore, Singapore, pp. 441443. doi: 10.1109/APMC46564.2019.9038880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sitwala, M, De Witt, A, Van den Heever, F, Malan, S and Stander, T (2020) “Preliminary design of 18–45 GHz radio astronomy receiver,” Proc. SPIE 11453, Millimeter, Submillimeter, and Far-Infrared Detectors and Instrumentation for Astronomy X, 1145348, December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2562026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behrens, MT and Stander, T (2020) “Preliminary design of a dual 22/31 GHz single-chip water vapour radiometer,” Proc. SPIE 11445, Ground-based and Airborne Telescopes VIII, 1144580, December 2020. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2561999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyedokun, T, Geschke, R and Stander, T (2018) A Geometric study of tunable planar groove gap waveguide cavities. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 321, 012008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyedokun, T, Geschke, R and Stander, T (2017) “A tunable Ka-band planar groove gap waveguide resonant cavity,” 2017 IEEE Radio and Antenna Days of the Indian Ocean (RADIO, Cape Town, pp. 12. doi: 10.23919/RADIO.2017.8242231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajo-Iglesias, E and Kildal, PS (2010) Groove gap waveguide: a rectangular waveguide between contactless metal plates enabled by parallel-plate cut-off. Proceeding of 4th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation, Barcelona, Spain, 2010, 14.Google Scholar
Leong, K and Mazierska, J (2002) Precise measurements of the Q factor of dielectric resonators in the transmission mode-accounting for noise, crosstalk, delay of uncalibrated lines, coupling loss, and coupling reactance. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 50, 21152127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caranicola, RC and Fatima Salete, C (2020) 3.4/4.0 GHz tunable resonant cavity in SIW technology using metal post and PIN diode on a low-cost biasing network for 5G applications. Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications 19, 94105.Google Scholar
Liang, T, Hall, S, Heck, H and Brist, G (2006) “A Practical Method for Modeling PCB Transmission Lines with Conductor Surface Roughness and Wideband Dielectric Properties,” 2006 IEEE MTT-S International Microwave Symposium Digest, San Francisco, CA, pp. 17801783, doi: 10.1109/MWSYM.2006.249721.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, F, Wu, K, Hong, W, Han, L and Chen, X (2010) A low phase-noise VCO using an electronically tunable substrate integrated waveguide resonator. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques 58, 34523458.Google Scholar
He, F, Chen, X, Wu, K and Hong, W (2009) “Electrically tunable substrate integrated waveguide reflective cavity resonator,” Asia Pacific Microwave Conference, Singapore, pp. 119122. doi: 10.1109/APMC.2009.5385418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saghati, PA and Entesari, K (2014) A 1.7–2.2 GHz compact low phase-noise VCO using a widely-tuned SIW resonator. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 24, 622624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esmaeili, M and Bornemann, J (2017) Novel tunable bandstop resonators in SIW technology and their application to a dual-bandstop filter with one tunable stopband. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 27, 4042.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cariou, M, Cadiou, S, Potelon, B, Quendo, C, Ségalen, R and Mahé, F (2016) “New tunable substrate integrated waveguide bandstop resonator,” 2016 IEEE MTT-S Latin America Microwave Conference (LAMC), Puerto Vallarta, pp. 13. doi: 10.1109/LAMC.2016.7851244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Z, Hong, W, Chen, J and Zhou, J (2013) Design of high-Q tunable SIW resonator and its application to low phase noise VCO. IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters 23, 4345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar