Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:07:51.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The effects of non-linearity in spectrum sensing receivers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 July 2015

Vesa Turunen ,
Marko Kosunen ,
Sami Kallioinen ,
Aarno Pärssinen  and
Jussi Ryynänen
Vesa Turunen*
Affiliation:
Department of Micro- and Nanosciences, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, Finland
Marko Kosunen
Affiliation:
Department of Micro- and Nanosciences, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, Finland
Sami Kallioinen
Affiliation:
Nokia Technologies, 02150 Espoo, Finland
Aarno Pärssinen
Affiliation:
Department of Communications Engineering and Centre for Wireless Communications, University of Oulu, 90570 Oulu, Finland
Jussi Ryynänen
Affiliation:
Department of Micro- and Nanosciences, Aalto University, 00076 Aalto, Finland
*
Corresponding author: V. Turunen Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper analyses the effects of receiver non-linearity on the performance of the most commonly utilized signal detectors in cognitive radio systems. The analysis covers both self-modulation products of a single orthogonal frequency-division multiplexing (OFDM) signal and intermodulation (IM) products of two OFDM signals, and also their contribution to the probability of false detections. As a result, this work presents the linearity requirements for the spectrum sensor receiver front-end as a function of the sensitivity of the signal detector. Furthermore, we show that the cyclostationary feature detectors are more robust than the energy detectors against IM products of multiple interferers. Theoretical results are verified in measurements with a cyclostationary feature detector using digital video broadcasting – terrestrial (DVB-T) signals as an example.

Keywords

Wireless systems and signal processing (SDR, MIMO, UWB, etc.)Applications and standards (Mobile, Wireless, networks)
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 8 , Issue 7 , November 2016 , pp. 995 - 1003
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Federal Communications Commission: Unlicensed operations in the tv broadcast bands, Second Report and Order and Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 08-260, 2008.Google Scholar
[2]Federal Communications Commission: Unlicensed operations in the tv broadcast bands, Second Memorandum Opinion and Order, FCC 10-174, 2010.Google Scholar
[3]Electronic Communications Committee: Technical and Operational Requirements for the Possible Operation of Cognitive Radio Systems in the “White Spaces” of the Frequency Band 470–790 MHz, ECC Report 159, 2011.Google Scholar
[4]Ofcom: Digital Dividend: Cognitive Access, Statement on Licence-Exempting Cognitive Devices Using Interleaved Spectrum, Ofcom, 2009.Google Scholar
[5] Ghasemi, A.; Sousa, E.: Spectrum sensing in cognitive radio networks: requirements, challenges and design trade-offs. IEEE Commun. Mag., 46 (2008), 32–39.Google Scholar
[6] Yucek, T.; Arslan, H.: A survey of spectrum sensing algorithms for cognitive radio applications. IEEE Commun. Surveys & Tutorials, 11 (2009), 116–130.Google Scholar
[7] Haykin, S.; Thomson, D.; Reed, J.: Spectrum sensing for cognitive radio. Proc. IEEE, 97 (2009), 849–877.Google Scholar
[8] Urkowitz, H.: Energy detection of unknown deterministic signals. Proc. IEEE, 55 (1967), 523–531.Google Scholar
[9] Dandawate, A.; Giannakis, G.: Statistical tests for presence of cyclostationarity. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 42 (1994), 2355–2369.Google Scholar
[10] Turunen, V.; Kosunen, M.; Vääräkangas, M.; Ryynänen, J.: Correlation-based detection of OFDM signals in the angular domain. IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 61 (2012), 951–958.Google Scholar
[11] Kosunen, M.; Turunen, V.; Kokkinen, K.; Ryynänen, J.: Survey and analysis of cyclostationary signal detector implementations on FPGA. IEEE J. Emerging Select. Topics Circuits Syst., 3 (2013), 541–551.Google Scholar
[12] Akyildiz, I.; Lee, W.-Y.; Vuran, M.C.; Mohanty, S.: Next generation/dynamic spectrum access/cognitive radio wireless networks: a survey. Comput. Netw., 50 (2006), 2127–2159.Google Scholar
[13] Kallioinen, S. et al. : Multi-mode, multi-band spectrum sensor for cognitive radios embedded to a mobile phone, in Proc. Int. Conf. Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications, 2011, 236–240.Google Scholar
[14] Vääräkangas, M.; Kallioinen, S.; Pärssinen, A.; Turunen, V.; Ryynänen, J.: Trade-offs in primary detection using a mobile phone as a sensing device, in Proc. Int. Conf. Cognitive Radio Oriented Wireless Networks and Communications, 2011, 241–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Rebeiz, E.; Cabric, D.: How wideband receiver nonlinearities impact spectrum sensing, in Proc. IEEE Global Conf. Signal Information Processing, 2013, 1178–1181.Google Scholar
[16] Rebeiz, E.: Wideband Cyclostationary Spectrum Sensing and Modulation Classification, University of California, Los Angeles, 2014.Google Scholar
[17] Rebeiz, E.; Shahed Hagh Ghadam, A.; Valkama, M.; Cabric, D.: Spectrum sensing under RF non-linearities: performance analysis and DSP-enhanced receivers. IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 63 (2015), 1950–1964.Google Scholar
[18] Marshall, P.: Cognitive radio as a mechanism to manage front-end linearity and dynamic range. IEEE Commun. Mag., 47 (2009), 81–87.Google Scholar
[19] Mahrof, D.H.; Klumperink, E.A.M.; Haartsen, J.C.; Nauta, B.: On the effect of spectral location of interferers on linearity requirements for wideband cognitive radio receivers, in Proc. IEEE Symp. New Frontiers in Dynamic Spectrum Access Networks, 2010, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[20] Li, Y.; Rabaey, J.; Sangiovanni-Vincentelli, A.: Analysis of interference effects in MB-OFDM UWB systems, in Proc. IEEE Conf. Wireless Communications and Networking, 2008, 165–170.Google Scholar
[21] Pärssinen, A.: Multimode-multiband transceivers for next generation of wireless communications, in Proc. European Solid-State Circuits Conf., 2011, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22] Fujian, L.; Pui-In, M.; Martins, R.P.: Wideband receivers: design challenges, tradeoffs and state-of-the-art. IEEE Circuits Syst. Mag., 15 (2015), 12–24.Google Scholar