Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:24:58.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bandwidth improvement of planar antennas using a single-layer metamaterial substrate for X-band application

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 April 2020

O. Borazjani
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Eng., Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
M. Naser-Moghadasi
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Eng., Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
J. Rashed-Mohassel*
Affiliation:
School of ECE, College of Engineering, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran
R. A. Sadeghzadeh
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Eng., K. N. T. University of Technology, Tehran, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: J. Rashed-Mohassel, E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

To prevent far-field radiation characteristics degradation while increasing bandwidth, an attempt has been made to design and fabricate a microstrip antenna. An electromagnetic band gap (EBG) structure, including a layer of a metallic ring on a layer of Rogers 4003C substrate, is used. For a better design, a patch antenna with and without the EBG substrate has been simulated. The results show that the bandwidth can be improved up to 1.6 GHz in X-band by adding the EBG substrate. Furthermore, using this structure, a dual-band antenna was obtained as well. Finally, to validate the simulation results, a comparison has been done between simulation data and experimental results which demonstrate good agreement.

Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Schaubert, DH, Pozar, DM and Adrian, A (1989) Effect of microstrip antenna substrate thickness and permittivity: comparison of theories with experiment. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 37, 677682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horák, J and Raida, Z (2009) Influence of EBG structures on the far-field pattern of patch antennas. Radioengineering 18, 223229.Google Scholar
Palandöken, M (2011) Artificial Materials Based Microstrip Antenna Design. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arora, C, Pattnaik, SS and Baral, RN (2017) Performance enhancement of patch antenna array for 5.8 GHz Wi-MAX applications using metamaterial inspired technique. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 79, 124131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chandrasekaran, KT, Karim, MF, Nasimuddin and Alphones, A (2017) CRLH structure-based high-impedance surface for performance enhancement of planar antennas. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 11, 818826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Navarro-Tapia, M, Esteban, J and Camacho-Peñalosa, C (2013) Broadband slot array antenna with full-space steerable pattern in a composite right/left-handed waveguide. Radio Science 48, 406415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garg, P and Jain, P (2019) Design and analysis of a metamaterial inspired dual band antenna for WLAN application. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 11, 351358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, SK, Argyropoulos, C and Kosta, YP (2017) Broadband compact microstrip patch antenna design loaded by multiple split ring resonator superstrate and substrate. Waves in Random and Complex Media 27, 92102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, SK and Kosta, Y (2013) Triband microstrip-based radiating structure design using split ring resonator and complementary split ring resonator. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 55, 22192222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahmat-Samii, Y and Mosallaei, H (2001) Electromagnetic band-gap structures: classification, characterization, and applications, 11th International Conference on Antennas and Propagation (ICAP 2001), Manchester, UK.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y and Alexopoulos, NG (2007) Semianalytical formulation on the scattering of proximity equilibration cell closed ring photonic band gap structures. Radio Science 42, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, A, Kumar, D, Mohan, J and Gupta, HO (2014) Investigation of grid metamaterial and EBG structures and its application to patch antenna. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 7, 705712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdalla, MA, Al-Mohamadi, AA and Mohamed, IS (2019) A miniaturized dual band EBG unit cell for UWB antennas with high selective notching. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 11(2019), 1035–1043.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verma, A, Singh, AK, Srivastava, N, Patil, S and Kanaujia, BK (2019) Slot loaded EBG-based metasurface for performance improvement of circularly polarized antenna for WiMAX applications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 12(2020), 212220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kavousi, H, Rashed-Mohassel, J and Edalatipour, M (2017) Miniaturized patch antenna using a circular spiral-based metamaterial. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 59, 22762279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kawdungta, S, Jaibanauem, P, Pongga, R and Phongcharoenpanich, C (2017) Superstrate-integrated switchable beam rectangular microstrip antenna for gain enhancement. Radioengineering 26, 431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bakhtiari, A, Sadeghzadeh, RA and Moghadasi, MN (2018) Gain enhanced miniaturized microstrip patch antenna using metamaterial superstrates. IETE Journal of Research 65(2019), 635640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, MJ, Wu, LS and Mao, J (2012) Notched ultra-wideband (UWB) bandpass filter with wide upper stopband based on electromagnetic bandgap (EBG) structures, 2012 International Conference on Microwave and Millimeter Wave Technology (ICMMT), Shenzhen, China.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palandoken, M (2012) Metamaterial-Based Compact Filter Design, in Metamaterial. Rijeka, Croatia: InTech.Google Scholar
Deng, T, Li, ZW and Chen, ZN (2017) Ultrathin broadband absorber using frequency-selective surface and frequency-dispersive magnetic materials. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 65, 58865894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ren, J, Gong, S and Jiang, W (2018) Low-RCS monopolar patch antenna based on a dual-ring metamaterial absorber. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 17, 102105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, SK, Ladumor, M, Parmar, J and Guo, T (2019) Graphene-based tunable reflector superstructure grating. Applied Physics A 125, 574584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patel, SK, Ladumor, M and Katrodiya, D (2019) Highly directive optical radiating structure with circular and diamond shape Si perturbations. Materials Research Express 6, 116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, M and Behdad, N (2012) Ultra-wideband, true-time-delay, metamaterial-based microwave lenses, the 2012 IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation, Chicago, IL, USA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hadi, RJ, Sandhagen, C and Bangert, A (2014) Wideband high-gain multi-layer patch antenna-coupler with metamaterial superstrate for x-band applications, 2014 44th European Microwave Conference, Rome, Italy.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mishra, BP, Sahu, S, Parashar, SKS and Pathak, SK (2018) A compact wideband and high gain GRIN metamaterial lens antenna system suitable for C, X, Ku band application. Optik 165, 266274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gangwar, A and Gupta, SC (2014) Design of a single negative metamaterial based microstrip patch antenna. International Journal of Computers and Applications 98, 48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H, Ran, L, Huangfu, J, Grzegorczyk, TM and Kong, JA (2006) Equivalent circuit model for left-handed metamaterials. Journal of Applied Physics 100, 024915.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Islam, SS, Faruque, MRI and Islam, MT (2014) The design and analysis of a novel split-H-shaped metamaterial for multi-band microwave applications. Materials 7, 49945011.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yousefi, L, Mohajer-Iravani, B and Ramahi, OM (2007) Enhanced bandwidth artificial magnetic ground plane for low-profile antennas. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 6, 289292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafargholi, A and Mazaheri, MH (2015) Broadband microstrip antenna using epsilon near zero metamaterials. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 9, 16121617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, CR (2011) Inductance: Loop and Partial. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Chen, X, Grzegorczyk, TM, Wu, B-I, Pacheco, J and Kong, JA (2004) Robust method to retrieve the constitutive effective parameters of metamaterials. Physical Review E 70, 016608.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhalla, D and Bansal, K (2013) Design of a rectangular microstrip patch antenna using inset feed technique. IOSR Journal of Electronics and Communication Engineering 7, 813.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joshi, JG, Pattnaik, SS, Devi, S and Lohokare, MR (2010) Electrically small patch antenna loaded with metamaterial. IETE Journal of Research 56, 373379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mali, A, Hadi, RJ, Khan, MM, Sandhagen, C and Bangert, A (2013) Enhancement of X band planar antenna parameters with zero index metamaterial, 2013 International Workshop on Antenna Technology (iWAT).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Errifi, H, Baghdad, A, Badri, A and Sahel, A (2014) Improving microstrip patch antenna directivity using EBG Superstrate. American Journal of Engineering Research (AJER) 3, 125130.Google Scholar
Rahim, T and Xu, J (2016) Design of high gain and wide band EBG resonator antenna with dual layers of same dielectric superstrate at X-bands. Journal of Microwaves, Optoelectronics and Electromagnetic Applications 15, 93104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar