Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:54:13.507Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mutual-coupling reduction in triple-band MIMO antennas for WLAN using CSRRs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 March 2020

Vahid Najafy  and
Mohammad Bemani Open the ORCID record for Mohammad Bemani [Opens in a new window]
Vahid Najafy
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tarbiat Modares, Tehran, Iran
Mohammad Bemani*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Tabriz, Tabriz, Iran
*
Author for correspondence: Mohammad Bemani, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

For the requirements of low mutual-coupling MIMO antennas for WLAN, a new complementary split-ring resonator (CSRR) unit cell is introduced in this paper. A microstrip-fed Vivaldi antenna array is designed for WLAN applications, where compact triple-band gap-complementary split-ring resonator unit cells are loaded between two antennas to examine the effect of unit cells on the rate of mutual-coupling reduction. By inserting the CSRR, the final design offered an improvement in decoupling by 8.5, 10.5, and 18 dB at 3.65, 4.9, and 5.8 GHz, respectively, compared with the reference antenna. By suppressing surface waves, antenna gain and front-to-back ratio are improved.

Keywords

Metamaterialmultiple-input multiple-output (MIMO)mutual couplingtriple-band complementary split-ring resonator
Type
Antenna Design, Modeling and Measurements
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 12 , Special Issue 8: Special Issue EuMW 2019. Part II , October 2020 , pp. 762 - 768
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Niakan, N (2014) Mutual Coupling Reduction between Closely Spaced U-slot Patch Antennas by Optimizing Array Configuration and its Applications in MIMO Committee: University of Kansas.Google Scholar
Li, J et al. (2019) Dual-band eight-antenna array design for MIMO applications in 5G mobile terminals. IEEE Access 7, 71636–71644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jafargholi, A, Jafargholi, A and Choi, JH (2019) Mutual coupling reduction in an array of patch antennas using CLL metamaterial superstrate for MIMO applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 179–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, F and Rahmat-Samii, Y (2003) Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: a low mutual coupling design for array applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 51, 2936–2946.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdalla, M, Mahrous, A, Mitkees, A and Ali, A (2018) Surface wave and mutual coupling reduction between four element linear MIMO array antenna. International Conference on Aerospace Sciences and Aviation Technology 15, 1–6.Google Scholar
Abedin, MF and Ali, M (2005) Effects of a smaller unit cell planar EBG structure on the mutual coupling of a printed dipole array. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 4, 274–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajo-Iglesias, E, Quevedo-Teruel, Ó and Inclán-Sánchez, L (2008) Mutual coupling reduction in patch antenna arrays by using a planar EBG structure and a multilayer dielectric substrate. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 1648–1655.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, B-Q, Liang, J, Zeng, Y-S and Zhang, H-M (2008) A novel compact and wide-band uni-planar EBG structure. Progress in Electromagnetics Research 1, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coulombe, M, Farzaneh Koodiani, S and Caloz, C (2010) Compact elongated mushroom (EM)-EBG structure for enhancement of patch antenna array performances. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 58, 1076–1086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qamar, Z, Naeem, U, Khan, SA, Chongcheawchamnan, M and Shafique, MF (2016) Mutual coupling reduction for high-performance densely packed patch antenna arrays on finite substrate. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 64, 1653–1660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, XM, Liu, XG, Zhou, XY and Cui, TJ (2012) Reduction of mutual coupling between closely packed patch antennas using waveguided metamaterials. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 11, 389–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, JY, Kim, SH and Jang, JH (2015) Reduction of mutual coupling in planar multiple antenna by using 1-D EBG and SRR structures. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 4194–4198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hafezifard, R, Naser-Moghadasi, M, Mohassel, JR and Sadeghzadeh, RA (2016) Mutual coupling reduction for two closely spaced meander line antennas using metamaterial substrate. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 15, 40–43.Google Scholar
Iqbal, A, Saraereh, OA, Bouazizi, A and Basir, A (2018) Metamaterial-based highly isolated MIMO antenna for portable wireless applications. Electronics 7, 267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tan, X, Wang, W, Wu, Y, Liu, Y and Kishk, AA (2019) Enhancing isolation in dual-band meander-line multiple antenna by employing split EBG structure. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 67, 2769–2774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Assimonis, SD, Yioultsis, TV and Antonopoulos, CS (2012) Computational investigation and design of planar EBG structures for coupling reduction in antenna applications. IEEE Transactions on Magnetics 48, 771–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, N and Kiran Kommuri, U (2018) MIMO antenna mutual coupling reduction for WLAN using Spiro Meander line UC-EBG. Progress in Electromagnetics Research C 80, 65–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, K, Li, Y and Liu, X (2018) Mutual coupling reduction of a MIMO antenna array using 3-D novel meta-material structures. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal 33, 758–763.Google Scholar
Jiao, T, Jiang, T and Li, Y (2018) A low mutual coupling MIMO antenna using 3-D electromagnetic isolation wall structures. 2017 IEEE 6th Asia-Pacific Conference on Antennas Propagation, APCAP 2017: Proceeding, vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 1–2.Google Scholar
Luo, S, Li, Y, Xia, Y and Zhang, L (2019) A low mutual coupling antenna array with gain enhancement using metamaterial loading and neutralization line structure. Applied Computational Electromagnetics Society Journal 34, 411–418.Google Scholar
Liu, F, Guo, J, Zhao, L, Huang, G-L, Li, Y and Yin, Y (2019) Dual-band metasurface-based decoupling method for two closely packed dual-band antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 68, 552–557.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bait-Suwailam, MM, Siddiqui, OF and Ramahi, OM (2010) Mutual coupling reduction between microstrip patch antennas using slotted-complementary split-ring resonators. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 9, 876–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chouhan, S, Panda, DK, Gupta, M and Singhal, S (2018) Multiport MIMO antennas with mutual coupling reduction techniques for modern wireless transreceive operations: a review. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 28, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar