Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:51:32.306Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Meta-heuristic optimization algorithms for simultaneous optimization of sidelobe level and directivity of uniformly excited concentric ring array antennas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 September 2019

Kailash Pati Dutta Open the ORCID record for Kailash Pati Dutta [Opens in a new window]  and
G. K. Mahanti
Kailash Pati Dutta*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, West Bengal 713209, India
G. K. Mahanti
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, National Institute of Technology, Durgapur, West Bengal 713209, India
*
Author for correspondence: Kailash Pati Dutta, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper proposes the novel application of three meta-heuristic optimization algorithms namely crow search algorithm, moth flame optimization, and symbiotic organism search algorithm for the synthesis of uniformly excited multiple concentric ring array antennas. The objective of this work is to minimize the sidelobe level (SLL) and maximize the peak directivity simultaneously. Three different cases are demonstrated separately with various constraints such as optimal inter-element spacing and/or optimal ring radii. Comparative study of the algorithms using common parameters such as SLL, directivity, first null beam width, best cost, and run time has been reported. Investigation results prove the superiority of case 3 over other cases in terms of directivity and SLL. This work demonstrates the potential of these algorithms.

Keywords

Concentric ring arrayCrow search algorithmdirectivityMoth flame optimizationsidelobe levelsSymbiotic organism search
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , March 2020 , pp. 183 - 192
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Elliott, RS (2003) Antenna Theory and Design. New York: IEEE/Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
2.Reyna, A, Panduro, MA and Del Rio, C (2011) Design of concentric ring antenna arrays for isoflux radiation in GEO Satellites. IEICE Electronics Express 8, 484–490.Google Scholar
3.Maldonado, AR, Panduro, MA, Bocio, CdR and Menzed, AL (2013) Design of concentric ring antenna array for a reconfigurable isoflux pattern. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 27, 1483–1495.Google Scholar
4.Maldonado, AR and Panduro, MA (2014) Synthesis of concentric ring antenna array for a wide isoflux pattern. International Journal of Numerical Modelling 28, 433–441.Google Scholar
5.Ibarra, M, Panduro, MA, Andrade, AG and Reyna, A (2015) Design of sparse concentric rings array for LEO satellites. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 29, 1983–2001.Google Scholar
6.Jiang, Y and Zhang, S (2013) An innovative strategy for synthesis of uniformly weighted circular aperture antenna array based on the weighting density method. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 12, 725–728.Google Scholar
7.Bucci, OM and Pinchera, D (2012) A generalized hybrid approach for the synthesis of uniform amplitude pencil beam ring-arrays. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 174–183.Google Scholar
8.Reyna, A, Panduro, MA, Covarrubias, DH and Menzed, A (2012) Design of steerable concentric ring arrays for low side lobe level. Scientia Iranica D 19, 727–732.Google Scholar
9.Panduro, MA, Brizuela, CA, Garza, J, Hinojosa, S and Reyna, A (2013) A comparison of NSGA-II, DEMO, and EM-MOPSO for the multi-objective design of concentric rings antenna arrays. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 27, 1100–1113.Google Scholar
10.Panduro, MA (2008) Evolutionary multi-objective design of non-uniform circular phased arrays. COMPEL – The International Journal for Computation and Mathematics in Electrical and Electronic Engineering 27, 551–566.Google Scholar
11.Panduro, MA, Menzed, AL, Dominguez, R and Romero, G (2006) Design of non-uniform circular antenna arrays for side lobe reduction using the method of genetic algorithms. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 60, 713–717.Google Scholar
12.Garza, LA, Yepes, LF, Covarrubias, DH, Alonso, MA and Panduro, MA (2016) Synthesis of sparse circular antenna arrays applying a tapering technique over reconstructed continuous current distribution. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 10, 347–352.Google Scholar
13.Salas-Sánchez, AA, Rodríguez-González, JA, Moreno-Piquero, E and Ares-Pena, FJ (2014) Synthesis of Taylor-like patterns with uniformly excited multi-ring planar antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 62, 1589–1595.Google Scholar
14.Chatterjee, A, Mahanti, GK and Pathak, NN (2010) Comparative performance of gravitational search algorithm and modified particle swarm optimization algorithm for synthesis of thinned scanned concentric ring array antenna. Progress in Electromagnetic Research B 25, 331–348.Google Scholar
15.Basu, B and Mahanti, GK (2012) Thinning of concentric two-ring circular array antenna using fire fly algorithm. Scientia Iranica 19, 1802–1809.Google Scholar
16.Panduro, MA, Brizuela, CA, Balderas, LI and Acosta, DA (2009) A comparison of genetic algorithms, particle swarm optimization and the differential evolution method for the design of scannable circular antenna arrays. Progress in Electromagnetics Research B 13, 171–186.Google Scholar
17.Dessouky, M, Sharshar, H and Albagory, Y (2006) A novel tapered beamforming window for uniform concentric circular arrays. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 20, 2077–2089.Google Scholar
18.Haupt, RL (2008) Optimized element spacing for low sidelobe concentric ring arrays. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 266–268.Google Scholar
19.Guo, Q, Chen, C and Jiang, Y (2017) An effective approach for the synthesis of uniform amplitude concentric ring arrays. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 2558–2561.Google Scholar
20.Bai, Y-Y, Xiao, S, Liu, C and Wang, B-Z (2013) A hybrid IWO/PSO algorithm for pattern synthesis of conformal phased arrays. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 2328–2332.Google Scholar
21.Yang, J, Li, W, Shi, X, Li, X and Yu, J (2013) A hybrid ABC-DE algorithm and its application for time-modulated array pattern synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 5485–5495.Google Scholar
22.Wolpert, DH and Macready, WG (1997) No free launch theorems for optimization. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 1, 67–82.Google Scholar
23.Askarzadeh, A (2016) A novel metaheuristic method for solving constrained engineering optimization problems: crow search algorithm. Computers and Structures 169, 1–12.Google Scholar
24.Mirjalili, S (2015) Moth-flame optimization algorithm: a novel nature-inspired heuristic paradigm. Knowledge Based Systems 89, 228–249.Google Scholar
25.Cheng, M-Y and Prayogo, D (2014) Symbiotic organism search: a new metaheuristic optimization algorithm. Computers and Structures 139, 98–112.Google Scholar
26.Bregains, JC, Coleman, IC, Ares, F and Moreno, E (2004) Calculating directivities with the two-dimensional Simpon's rule. IEEE Antennas and Propagation Magazine 46, 106–112.Google Scholar