Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T08:43:57.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Interference cancellation for higher harmonics of supply-modulated efficient RF power amplifier systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 August 2016

Mohammad Omer
Affiliation:
Cognitive Systems Corp, Canada
Farasat Munir*
Affiliation:
Department of Electrical Engineering, LUMS SBA School of Science and Engineering, DHA, Lahore
*
Corresponding author: F. Munir Email: [email protected]

Abstract

In building highly efficient transmitters of today, one is forced to sacrifice linearity for efficiency. Some of the highest power amplifier efficiency figures are reported by envelope tracking (ET) amplifiers. These amplifiers can generate strong higher-order harmonics, which can lead to interference with receivers operating at the harmonic frequencies. Using non-linear interference cancellation, we can help to remove the interference being caused in those receivers. This paper looks at the problem of modeling the third and second-order harmonic emission from an ET amplifier. It derives the non-linear kernel for estimating such interference. This kernel has been rigorously expanded to show its correlation with the various harmonics and its effectiveness in predicting the harmonic content. We then set up an envelope amplifier test-bench to capture harmonic signal content and cancel it using the derived kernel model. The experiment yields excellent agreement with theory and provides a validation of the system and concept.

Type
Research Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Kim, J.; Son, J.; Jee, S.; Kim, S.; Kim, B.: Optimization of envelope tracking power amplifier for base-station applications. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 61 (4) (2013), 16201627.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2] Zhou, G.T.: Analysis of spectral regrowth of weakly nonlinear power amplifiers, in IEEE Int.l Conf. on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, Proceedings, vol. 5, 2000, 27372740.Google Scholar
[3] Ku, H.; Kenney, J.S.: Behavioral modeling of RF power amplifiers considering IMD and spectral regrowth asymmetries, in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, vol. 2, 2003, 799802.Google Scholar
[4] Gard, K.G.; Gutierrez, H.M.; Steer, M.B.: Characterization of spectral regrowth in microwave amplifiers based on the nonlinear transformation of a complex Gaussian process. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 47 (7) (1999), 10591069.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[5] Omer, M.; Rimini, R.; Heidmann, P.; Kenney, J.S.: A compensation scheme to allow full duplex operation in the presence of highly nonlinear microwave components for 4 G systems, in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest (MTT), 2011, 14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6] Omer, M.; Rimini, R.; Heidmann, P.; Kenney, J.S.: A PA-noise cancellation technique for next generation highly integrated RF front-ends, in IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symp. (RFIC), Montreal, QC, 2012, 471474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[7] Zhou, J.; Chakrabarti, A.; Kinget, P.R.; Krishnaswamy, H.: Low-noise active cancellation of transmitter leakage and transmitter noise in broadband wireless receivers for FDD/co-existence. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 49 (12) (2014), 30463062.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[8] Razavi, B.: The future of radios, in IEEE Int. Symp. on Circuits and Systems (ISCAS), 2015, 18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[9] Fabiano, I.; Sosio, M.; Liscidini, A.; Castello, R.: SAW-less analog front-end receivers for TDD and FDD. IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 48 (12) (2013), 30673079.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[10] Goel, A.; Analui, B.; Hashemi, H.: Tunable duplexer with passive feed-forward cancellation to improve the RX-TX isolation. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I: Regul. Pap., 62 (2) (2015), 536544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11] Schafer, S.; Popovic, Z.: Multi-frequency measurements for supply modulated transmitters. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 63 (9) (2015), 29312941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[12] Raffo, A.; Bosi, G.; Vadala, V.; Vannini, G.: Behavioral modeling of GaN FETs: a load-line approach. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 62 (1) (2014), 7382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Santarelli, A.; Di Giacomo, V.; Raffo, A.; Traverso, P.A.; Vannini, G.; Filicori, F.: A nonquasi-static empirical model of electron devices. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 54 (12) (2006), 40214031.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[14] Omer, M.; Rimini, R.; Draxler, P.J.; Kenney, J.S.: Interference cancellation for odd harmonics of envelope tracking RF power amplifier systems, in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest (IMS), 2013, 13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[15] Ku, H.; Mckinley, M.D.; Kenney, J.S.: Extraction of accurate behavioral models for power amplifiers with memory effects using two-tone measurements, in IEEE MTT-S Int. Microwave Symp. Digest, vol. 1, 2002, 139142.Google Scholar