Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T19:48:19.003Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Experimental validation of an isoflux Earth coverage with a bimode ARMA antenna on a nanosatellite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2019

E. Arnaud Open the ORCID record for E. Arnaud [Opens in a new window] ,
A. Siblini ,
A. Bellion  and
B. Jecko
E. Arnaud
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS, 123 Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France
A. Siblini
Affiliation:
Lebanese University, Doctoral School of Technology, Beyrouth, Lebanon
A. Bellion
Affiliation:
CNES, 18 avenue Edouard Belin, 31401-Toulouse, France
B. Jecko
Affiliation:
XLIM – CNRS, 123 Avenue Albert Thomas, 87060 Limoges Cedex, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Spatial telemetry links on nanosatellites require more and more reconfigurable beam antennas to improve the Earth coverage. The bi-mode Agile Radiating Matrix Antenna (8.0–8.4 GHz) was successfully designed to solve such kind of problems by using an isoflux mode associated with a switchable directive one. However, such an antenna introduces some manufacturing problems for the isoflux mode, mainly due to the small available volume on the nanosatellite platform. This paper describes a solution to this problem thanks to the ARMA concept. A comparison between theoretical and experimental results for the isoflux mode in circular polarization is presented to validate the results.

Keywords

Agile Radiating Matrix Antennacircular polarizationisoflux radiation patternnanosatellite application
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 12 , Issue 1 , February 2020 , pp. 66 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Geyer, H (1966) Runder Hornstrahler mit ringformigen Sperrtopfen zur gleichzeitigen Ubertragung zweier polarisationsentkoppelter Wellen. Frequenz 20, 22–28 (especially p. 27).Google Scholar
2.LaGrone, A and Roberts, G (1966) Minor lobe suppression in a rectangular horn antenna through the utilization of a high impedance choke flange. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 14, 102, 104.Google Scholar
3.Wohlleben, R, Mattes, H and Lochner, O (1972) Simple small primary feed for large opening angles and high aperture efficiency. Electronics Letters 8, 474, 476.Google Scholar
4.Shafai, L (1977) Broadening of primary feed patterns by small E-plane slots. Electronics Letters 13, 102–103.Google Scholar
5.Brachat, P (1994) Sectoral pattern synthesis with primary feeds. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 42, 484–491.Google Scholar
6.Arnaud, E, Menudier, C, Fouany, J, Monediere, T and Thevenot, M (2017) X-band compact dual circularly polarized isoflux antenna for nanosatellite applications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 1509–1516.Google Scholar
7.Maldonadoa, AR, Panduroa, MA, del Rio Bociob, C and Mendez, A (2013) Design of concentric ring antenna array for a reconfigurable isoflux pattern. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 27, 1483–1495.Google Scholar
8.Maldonadoa, AR, Panduroa, MA, del Rio Bociob, C and Mendez, A (2011) Design of concentric ring antenna arrays for isoflux radiation in GEO satellites. Journal of IEICE Electronics Express 8, 484–490.Google Scholar
9.Jin, J, Wang, HL, Zhu, WM and Liu, YZ (2006) Array patterns synthesizing using genetic algorithm. Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symposium, Cambridge, USA, 26–29 March 2006.Google Scholar
10.Ibarra, M, Reyna, A, Panduro, MA and del Rio-Bocio, C (2011) Design of aperiodic planar arrays for desirable isoflux radiation in GEO satellites. Antennas and Propagation (APSURSI), Spokane.Google Scholar
11.Quijano, JLA, Righero, M and Vecchi, G (2014) Sparse 2-D array placement for arbitrary pattern mask and with excitation constraints: a simple deterministic approach. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 62, 1652–1662.Google Scholar
12.Roy, SM and Balbin, I (2010) Handheld reader antenna at 5.8 GHz. Department of Electrical and Computer Systems Engineering, Monash University, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.Google Scholar
13.Jecko, B, Arnaud, E, Abou Taam, H and Siblini, A (2017) The ARMA concept: comparison of AESA and ARMA technologies for agile antenna design. FERMAT 20, Article 2.Google Scholar
14.Siblini, A, Jecko, B and Arnaud, E (2017) Multimode reconfigurable nano-satellite antenna for PDTM application. 2017 11th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EUCAP), Paris, pp. 542–545.Google Scholar
15.Siblini, A, Taam, HA, Jecko, B, Ramma, M, Bellion, A and Arnaud, E (2017) ARMA feeding techniques for isoflux coverage from a micro satellite. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal 2, 63–69.Google Scholar
16.Menudier, C, Arnaud, E, Thevenot, M, Fezai, F, Oueslati, A, Chevalier, N, Reynaud, S and Monediere, T (2015) Synthesis of multi-element antennas using a measurement test bench. 2015 European Radar Conference (EuRAD), Paris, pp. 345–348.Google Scholar