Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-22T18:41:20.040Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Compact MIMO antenna with optimized mutual coupling reduction using DGS

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2013

Ahmed A. Ibrahim ,
Mahmoud A. Abdalla ,
Adel B. Abdel-Rahman  and
Hesham F. A. Hamed
Ahmed A. Ibrahim
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, El-Minia University, El-Minia, Egypt
Mahmoud A. Abdalla*
Affiliation:
Electrical Engineering branch, MTC College, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
Adel B. Abdel-Rahman
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, South Valley University, Qena, Egypt
Hesham F. A. Hamed
Affiliation:
Faculty of Engineering, El-Minia University, El-Minia, Egypt
*
Corresponding author: M. A. Abdalla Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A design of low mutual coupling between two microstrip patch antennas for multi input multi output antenna is presented. The two antenna elements operate at 5.8 GHz for wireless applications. The reduction of mutual coupling between the antenna elements is achieved by using a defected ground structure (DGS). The DGS is inserted between the microstrip patch antenna elements to limit the surface waves between them. The separation between the edges of the two elements has been achieved to be only 0.058λ0. The analysis of the correlation coefficient, diversity gain and total active reflection coefficient is presented to validate the performance of the multiple-input–multiple-output (MIMO) antenna. The isolation of the proposed MIMO antenna is 28 dB at 5.8 GHz and the envelope correlation equals 0.003. Owing to these good performances each antenna can operate almost independently. A good agreement is achieved between the simulated and the measured results.

Keywords

MIMO antennaDGSCoupling reduction
Type
Research Paper
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 6 , Issue 2 , April 2014 , pp. 173 - 180
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1]Paulraj, A.J.; Gore, D.A.; Nabar, R.U.; Bölcskei, H.: An overview of MIMO communications-a key to gigabit wireless. Proc. IEEE, 92 (2) (2004), 198–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[2]Zhang, H.; Wang, Z.; Yu, J.; Huang, J.: A compact MIMO antenna for wireless communication. IEEE Antennas Propag. Mag., 50 (6) (2008), 104–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[3]Fakhr, R.S.: Compact size and dual band semicircle shaped antenna for MIMO applications. Prog. Electromagn. Res. C, 11 (2009), 147–154.Google Scholar
[4]Li, H.; Xiong, J.; He, S.: A compact planar MIMO antenna system of four elements with similar radiation characteristics and isolation structure. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 8 (2009), 1107–1110.Google Scholar
[5]Zhang, L.; Castaneda, J.A.; Alexopoulos, N.G.: Scan blindness free phased array design using PBG materials. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 52 (8) (2004), 2000–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[6]Yang, F.; Rahmat-Sami, Y.: Microstrip antennas integrated with electromagnetic band-gap (EBG) structures: a low mutual coupling design for array applications. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 51 (10) (2003), 2936–2946.Google Scholar
[7]Fu, Y.; Yuan, N.: Elimination of scan blindness in phased array of microstrip patches using electromagnetic bandgap materials. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 3 (2004), 63–65.Google Scholar
[8]Yang, H.Y.D.; Wang, J.: Surface waves of printed antennas on planar artificial periodic dielectric structures. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 49 (3) (2001), 444–450.Google Scholar
[9]Yang, L.; Fan, M.; Chen, F.; She, J.; Feng, Z.: A novel compact electromagnetic-bandgap (EBG) structure and its applications for microwave circuits. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 53 (1) (2005), 183–190.Google Scholar
[10]Abdel-Rahman, A.; Verma, A.K.; Boutejdar, A.; Omar, A.S.: Control of band stop response of Hi-Lo microstrip lowpass filter using slot in ground plane. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 52 (3) (2004), 1008–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[11]Lim, C.S.; Kim, C.S.; Ahn, D.; Jeong, Y.C.; Nam, S.: Design of the low-pass filters using defected ground structure. IEEE Trans. Microw. Theory Tech., 53 (8) (2005), 2539–2545.Google Scholar
[12]Hou, D.-B.; Xiao, S.; Wang, B.-Z.; Jiang, L.; Wang, J.; Hong, W.: Elimination of scan blindness with compact defected ground structures in microstrip phased array. IET Microw. Antennas Propag., 3 (2) (2009), 269–275.Google Scholar
[13]Vazquez, C.; Hotopan, G.; Ver Hoeye, S.; Fernandez, M.; Herran, L.F.; Las-Heras, F.: Defected ground structure for coupling reduction between probe Fed microstrip antenna elements, in PIERS Proc., Cambridge, USA, July 5–8, 2010, 640–644.Google Scholar
[14]Zulkii, F.Y.; Rahardjo, E.T.; Hartanto, D.: Mutual coupling reduction using dumbbell defected ground structure for multiband microstrip antenna array. Prog. Electromagn. Res. Lett., 13 (2010), 29–40.Google Scholar
[15]Zulkii, F.Y.; Rahardjo, E.T.: Compact MIMO microstrip antenna with defected ground for mutual coupling suppression, in Progress in Electromagnetics Research Symp. Proc., Marrakesh, Morocco, March 20–23, 2011.Google Scholar
[16]Hajilou, Y.; Hassani, H.R.; Rahmati, B.: Mutual coupling reduction between microstrip patch antennas, in EuCAP Proc., 2012, 1–4.Google Scholar
[17]Abdel-Rahman, A.B.; El Dein, A.Z.; Hamed, H.F.A.; Ibrahim, A.A.: Small size third order coupled resonator band-pass filter using capacitor loaded slots, in IEEE APS, Middle East Conf. on Antennas and Propagation (MECAP), Cairo, Egypt, 2010.Google Scholar
[18]Blanch, S.; Romeu, J.; Corbella, I.: Exact representation of antenna system diversity performance from input parameter description. Electron. Lett., 39 (9) (2003), 705–707.Google Scholar
[19]Rosengren, K.; Kildal, P.-S.: Radiation efficiency, correlation, diversity gain and capacity of a six monopole antenna array for a MIMO system: theory, simulation and measurement in reverberation chamber. IEE Proc. Microw. Antennas Propag., 153 (6) 2006.Google Scholar
[20]Manteghi, M.; Rahmat-Samii, Y.: Multiport characteristics of a wide-band cavity backed annular patch antenna for multipolarization operations. IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., 53 (1) (2005), 466–474.Google Scholar
[21]Chae, S.H.; Oh, S.; Park, S.-O.: Analysis of mutual coupling, correlations, and TARC in WiBro MIMO array antenna. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 6 (2007), 122–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[22]Vazquez, C.; Hotopan, G.; Ver Hoeye, S.; Fernandez, M.; Herran, L.F.; Las-Heras, F.: Defected ground structure for coupling reduction between probe fed microstrip antenna elements, in PIERS Proc., Cambridge, USA, July 5–8, 2010.Google Scholar
[23]Tariqul Islam, M., Shahidul Alam, Md.: Compact EBG structure for alleviating mutual coupling between patch antenna array elements. Prog. Electromagn. Res., 137 (2013), 425–438.Google Scholar
[24]Bait-Suwailam, M.M.; Siddiqui, O.F.; Ramahi, O.M.: Mutual coupling reduction between microstrip patch antennas using slotted-complementary split-ring resonators. IEEE Antennas Wirel. Propag. Lett., 9 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar