Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T12:21:04.446Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A compact dual-polarized co-radiator MIMO antenna for UWB applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 March 2021

Harleen Kaur ,
Hari Shankar Singh Open the ORCID record for Hari Shankar Singh [Opens in a new window]  and
Rahul Upadhyay
Harleen Kaur
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India
Hari Shankar Singh*
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India TIET-VT Center of Excellence for Emerging Materials (CEEMS), TIET, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India
Rahul Upadhyay
Affiliation:
Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, Thapar Institute of Engineering and Technology, Patiala-147 004, Punjab, India
*
Author for correspondence: Hari Shankar Singh, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In this research study, a compact dual-polarized co-radiator ultra-wideband (UWB) multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) antenna with improved impedance bandwidth and isolation is proposed for wireless applications. The designed co-radiator has an overall area of 0.3λo × 0.3λo mm2 (where, λo is free space wavelength corresponding to the lower cut-off frequency, i.e., 3.1 GHz). The proposed resonator comprises of a hybrid geometry which is created with the combinations of a circular-shaped patch, a square, and two rectangular stubs. It is centrally aligned between two 50 Ω micro-strip feed lines that are positioned orthogonal to each other. Further, the modified ground plane is attached with the end-loaded line which provides broadband isolation over entire UWB frequency band. The simulated results of the proposed antenna exhibit wideband characteristics with impedance bandwidth of 3.1–16.9 GHz with minimum isolation of −15 dB. Moreover, all the radiation performance parameters are analyzed and discussed. Some important diversity parameters such as envelope correlation coefficient, mean effective gain, effective diversity gain, and channel capacity loss have also been evaluated. Furthermore, all the measured results of proposed antenna agree well with the simulated results which make the proposed antenna a suitable candidate for UWB-MIMO wireless applications.

Keywords

Channel capacity lossdiversity gainenvelop correlation coefficientsmean effective gainmultiple-input multiple-output and ultra-wideband
Type
Antenna Design, Modeling and Measurements
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , March 2022 , pp. 225 - 238
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Federal Communication Commission (FCC) (2002) First report and order on ultra-wideband technology. Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Kaiser, T and Zheng, F (2010) Ultra Wideband Systems with MIMO. USA: John Wiley & Sons Ltd, pp. 1–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, ACK, Rowell, CR and Murch, RD (2008) Isolation enhancement between two closely packed antennas. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 56, 3411–3419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malviya, L, Panigrahi, RK and Kartikeyan, MV (2017) MIMO antennas with diversity and mutual coupling reduction techniques: a review. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 1763–1780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hui, Z, Zhang, F, Wang, C and Zhang, X (2014) A universal methodology for designing a ultra-wideband (UWB) diversity antenna. Journal of Electromagnetic Waves and Applications 28, 1221–1235.Google Scholar
Wani, Z and Kumar, D (2015) Dual-band-notched antenna for UWB MIMO applications. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 381–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, W, Yuan, B and Wu, A (2018) A quad-element UWB-MIMO antenna with band-notch and reduced mutual coupling based on EBG structures. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 2018, 1–10, Article ID 8490740.Google Scholar
Li, Q, Feresidis, AP, Mavridou, M and Hall, PS (2015) Miniaturized double-layer EBG structures for broadband mutual coupling reduction between UWB monopoles. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 1168–1171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, S and Pedersen, G (2015) Mutual coupling reduction for UWB MIMO antennas with a wideband neutralization line. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letter 15, 166–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaur, H, Singh, HS and Upadhyay, R (2018) 4-Elements MIMO system integrated with planar monopole and slot antenna for wireless. Proceedings of 2018 IEEE International RF and Microwave Conference, Penang, Malaysia, pp. 41–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luo, CM, Hong, JS and Zhong, LL (2015) Isolation enhancement of a very compact UWB-MIMO slot antenna with two defected ground structures. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 14, 1766–1769.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, MS, Capobianco, AD, Najam, AI, Shoaib, I, Autizi, E and Shafique, MF (2014) Compact ultra-wideband diversity antenna with a floating parasitic digitised decoupling structure, IET microwaves. Antennas and Propagation 8, 747–753.Google Scholar
Mao, CX and Chu, QX (2014) Common co-radiator UWB-MIMO antenna with dual polarization. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 62, 4474–4480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Srivastava, G, Kanuijia, BK and Paulus, R (2017) UWB MIMO antenna with common radiator. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 9, 573–580.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, MS, Capobianco, AD and Iftikhar, A (2016) A compact dual-polarized ultra-wideband multiple-input multiple-output antenna. Microwave Optical Technology Letters 58, 163–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patre, SR and Singh, SP (2018) Shared radiator MIMO antenna for broadband applications. IET Microwaves, Antennas & Propagation 12, 1153–1159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghimire, J, Choi, KW and Choi, DY (2019) Bandwidth enhancement and mutual coupling reduction using a notch and a parasitic structure in a UWB-MIMO antenna. International Journal of Antennas and Propagation 2019, 1–9, Article ID 8945386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorai, A, Dasgupta, A and Ghatak, R (2018) A compact quasi-self-complementary dual band notched UWB MIMO antenna with enhanced isolation using Hilbert fractal slot. International Journal of Electronics and Communication 94, 36–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nirmal, PC, Nandgaonkar, A, Nalbalwar, S and Gupta, RK (2019) Compact wideband MIMO antenna for 4 G WI-MAX, WLAN and UWB applications. International Journal of Electronics and Communication 99, 284–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irene, G and Rajesh, A (2018) A dual-polarized UWB-MIMO antenna with IEEE 802.11ac band-notched characteristics using split-ring resonator. Journal of Computational Electronics 17, 1090–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohandoss, S, Thipparaju, RR, Reddy, BNB, Palaniswamy, SK and Marudappa, P (2018) Fractal based ultra-wideband antenna development for wireless personal area communication applications. International Journal of Electronics and Communication 93, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayginer, M and Rebeiz, GM (2016) An eight-element 2–16 GHz programmable phased array receiver with one, two, or four simultaneous beams in SiGe BiCMOS. IEEE Transaction on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 64, 4585–4597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CST Microwave Studio. Available at http://www.cst.com.Google Scholar
Chouhan, S, Panda, DK, Gupta, M and Singhal, S (2018) Multiport MIMO antennas with mutual coupling reduction techniques for modern wireless transrecieve operations: a review. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 28, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taga, T (1990) Analysis for mean effective gain of mobile antennas in land mobile radio environments. IEEE Transaction on Vehicular Technologies 39, 117–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedersen, KI, Mogensen, PE and Fleury, BH (1997) Power azimuth spectrum in outdoor environments. Electronics Letters 33, 1583–1584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
See, CH, Abd-Alhameed, RA, Abidin, ZZ, McEwan, NJ and Excell, PS (2012) Wideband printed MIMO/diversity monopole antenna for WiFi/WiMAX applications. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 2028–2035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar