Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T07:55:08.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Angle and polarization-independent miniaturized UWB FSS design

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 January 2021

Yanning Yuan ,
Yuchen Zhao  and
Xiaoli Xi Open the ORCID record for Xiaoli Xi [Opens in a new window]
Yanning Yuan
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
Yuchen Zhao
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
Xiaoli Xi*
Affiliation:
The Faculty of Automation and Information Engineering, Xi'an University of Technology, Xi'an 710048, China
*
Author for correspondence: Xiaoli Xi, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A single-layer ultra-wideband (UWB) stop-band frequency selective surface (FSS) has several advantages in wireless systems, including a simple design, low debugging complexity, and an appropriate thickness. This study proposes a miniaturized UWB stop-band FSS design. The proposed FSS structure consists of a square-loop and metalized vias that are arranged on a single layer substrate; it has an excellent angle and polarization-independent characteristics. At an incident angle of 60°, the polarization response frequencies of the transverse electric and magnetic modes only shifted by 0.003 f0 and 0.007 f0, respectively. The equivalent circuit models of the square-loop and metallized vias structure are analysed and the accuracy of the calculation is evaluated by comparing the electromagnetic simulation. The 20 × 20 array constitutes an FSS reflector with a unit size of 4.2 mm × 4.2 mm (less than one-twentieth of the wavelength of 3 GHz), which realizes an UWB quasi-constant gain enhancement (in-band flatness is <0.5 dB). Finally, the simulation results were verified through sample processing and measurement; consistent results were obtained. The FSS miniaturization design method proposed in this study could be applied to the design of passband FSS (complementary structure), antennas and filters, among other applications.

Keywords

Frequency selective surface (FSS)ultra-wideband (UWB) antennametalized viasgain enhancement
Type
Antenna Design, Modelling and Measurements
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 13 , Issue 10 , December 2021 , pp. 1063 - 1071
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press in association with the European Microwave Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

First report and order, revision of part 15 of the commission's rules regarding ultra-wideband transmission systems, FCC 02-48, Feb. 2002.Google Scholar
Liang, J, Guo, L, Chiau, CC, Chen, X and Parini, CG (2005) Study of CPW-fed circular disc monopole antenna for ultra wideband applications. IEE Proceedings – Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 152, 520–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu, S (2019) Experimental study of a printed ultra-wideband modified circular monopole antenna. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 61, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu, S, Chatterjee, A, Jana, SK and Parui, SK (2018) A compact umbrella-shaped UWB antenna with gain augmentation using frequency selective surface. Radio Engineering 27, 448–454.Google Scholar
Ranga, Y, Matekovits, L, Weily, AR and Esselle, KP (2013) A constant gain ultra-wide band antenna with a multi-layer frequency selective surface. Progress In Electromagnetics Research (PIER) Letters 38, 119–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu, S (2018) Gain augmentation of a CPW fed printed miniature UWB antenna using frequency selective surface. Microwave and Optical Technology Letters 60, 1820–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yahya, R, Nakamura, A, Itami, M and Denidni, TA (2017) A novel UWB FSS-based polarization diversity antenna. IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters 16, 2525–2528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aybike, K, Gonca, C and Cengizhan, D (2017) A novel signal layer frequency selective surface design for ultra-wide band antenna gain enhancement, in 10th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ELECO), Bursa, Turkey, pp. 1075–1078.Google Scholar
Priyanka, D and Kaushik, M (2019) Modelling of ultra-wide stop-band frequency-selective surface to enhance the gain of a UWB antenna. IET Microwaves, Antennas and Propagation 13, 269–277.Google Scholar
Dey, A and Sanyal, R (2019) Single layer miniaturized ultra-thin FSS with five closely spaced bands. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 11, 797–805.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lazaro, A, Ramos, A, Girbau, D and Villarino, R (2013) A novel UWB RFID tag using active frequency selective surface. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 1155–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joozdani, Z, Amirhosseini, K and Abdolali, A (2016) Wideband radar cross-section reduction of patch array antenna with miniaturised hexagonal loop frequency selective surface. Electronics Letters 52, 767–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Akbari, M, Ali, MM, Farahani, M, Sebak, AR and Denidni, T (2017) Spatially mutual coupling reduction between CP-MIMO antennas using FSS superstrate. Electronics Letters 53, 516–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, HJ, Cho, SS, Kwon, OB, Kim, YJ and Hong, IP (2018) Paper-based uniplanar ultra-wideband frequency-selective surface design. Electronics Letters 55, 506–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kundu, S (2020) A compact uniplanar ultra-wideband frequency selective surface for antenna gain improvement and ground penetrating radar application. International Journal of RF and Microwave Computer-Aided Engineering 30, 1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sayi, SS and Ramprabhu, S (2020) A single-layer UWB frequency-selective surface with band-stop response. IEEE Transactions on Electromagnetic Compatibility 62, 276–279.Google Scholar
Da, L, Tianwu, L and Erping, L (2018) Implementation of ultra-miniaturised frequency-selective structures based on 2.5-D convoluted segments. Electronics Letters 54, 476–478.Google Scholar
Kushwaha, N, Kumar, R and Oli, T (2014) Design and analysis of new compact UWB frequency selective surface and its equivalent circuit. Progress in Electromagnetics Research 46, 31–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Majidzadeh, M, Ghobadi, C and Nourinia, J (2016) Novel single layer reconfigurable frequency selective surface with UWB and multi-band modes of operation. AEU – International Journal of Electronics and Communications 70, 151–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bashiri, M, Ghobadi, C, Nourinia, J and Majidzadeh, M (2018) An explicit single-layer frequency selective surface design with wide stop band frequency response. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 10, 819–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Umair, R and Shobit, A (2018) A modified frequency selective surface band-stop filter for ultra-wideband applications, 2018 International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), Paris, France, pp. 19–22.Google Scholar
Liu, HL, Kenneth, LF and Richard, JL (2009) Design methodology for a miniaturized frequency selective surface using lumped reactive components. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 57, 2732–2738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hua, B, He, X and Yang, Y (2017) Polarisation-independent UWB frequency selective surface based on 2.5D miniaturised hexagonal ring. Electronics Letters 53, 1502–1504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hussain, T, Cao, QS, Kayani, JK and Majid, I (2017) Miniaturization of frequency selective surfaces using 2.5-D knitted structures: design and synthesis. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 65, 2405–2412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yu, YM, Chiu, CN, Chiou, YP and Wu, TL (2015) An effective via-based frequency adjustment and minimization methodology for single-layered frequency-selective surfaces. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 63, 1641–1649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Varikuntla, KK and Singaravelu, R (2019) Design and implementation of 2.5D frequency-selective surface based on substrate-integrated waveguide technology. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 11, 255–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langley, J and Parker, A (1982) Equivalent circuit model for arrays of square loop. Electronics Letters 18, 294–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, NN (2004) Elements of Engineering Electromagnetics, 6th Edn. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Pearson Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Savidis, I and Friedman, EG (2009) Closed-form expressions of 3-D via resistance, inductance, and capacitance. IEEE Transactions on Electron Devices 56, 1873–1881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar