Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T19:10:28.018Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An improved gain-phase error self-calibration method for robust DOA estimation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2018

Wencan Peng Open the ORCID record for Wencan Peng [Opens in a new window] ,
Chenjiang Guo ,
Min Wang  and
Yuteng Gao
Wencan Peng
Affiliation:
School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
Chenjiang Guo*
Affiliation:
School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
Min Wang
Affiliation:
National Lab of Radar Signal Processing, Xidian University, Xi'an, China
Yuteng Gao
Affiliation:
School of Electronics and Information, Northwestern Polytechnical University, Xi'an, China
*
Author for correspondence: Chenjiang Guo, E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A novel online antenna array calibration method is presented in this paper for estimating direction-of-arrival (DOA) in the case of uncorrelated and coherent signals with unknown gain-phase errors. Conventional calibration methods mainly consider incoherent signals for uniform linear arrays with gain-phase errors. The proposed method has better performance not only for uncorrelated signals but also for coherent signals. First, an on-grid sparse technique based on the covariance fitting criteria is reformulated aiming at gain-phase errors to obtain DOA and the corresponding source power, which is robust to coherent sources. Second, the gain-phase errors are estimated in the case of uncorrelated and coherent signals via introducing an exchange matrix as the pre-processing of a covariance matrix and then decomposing the eigenvalues of the covariance matrix. Those parameters estimate values converge to the real values by an alternate iteration process. The proposed method does not require the presence of calibration sources and previous calibration information unlike offline ways. Simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed method which outperforms the traditional approaches.

Keywords

Meta-materials and photonic bandgap structurespassive components and circuits
Type
Research Papers
Information
International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies , Volume 11 , Issue 2 , March 2019 , pp. 105 - 113
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press and the European Microwave Association 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.Godara, LC (1997) Application of antenna arrays to mobile communications. II. Beam-forming and direction-of-arrival considerations. Proceedings of the IEEE 85, 1195–1245.Google Scholar
2.Swindlehurst, AL and Kailath, T (1992) A Performance analysis of subspace-based method in the presence of model errors, part I: the MUSIC algorithm. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 40, 1758–1774.Google Scholar
3.Osman, L, Sfar, I and Gharsallah, A (2015) The application of high-resolution methods for DOA estimation using a linear antenna array. International Journal of Microwave and Wireless Technologies 7, 87–94.Google Scholar
4.Roy, R and Kailath, T (2009) ESPRIT-Estimation of signal parameters via rotational invariance techniques. Adaptive Antennas for Wireless Communications 37, 224–235.Google Scholar
5.Zoltowski, MD, Haardt, M and Mathews, CP (1996) Closed-form 2-D angle estimation with rectangular arrays in element space or beamspace via unitary ESPRIT. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 44, 316–328. https://doi.org/10.1109/78.485927.Google Scholar
6.Ma, X, Dong, X and Xie, Y (2016) An improved spatial differencing method for DOA estimation with the coexistence of uncorrelated and coherent signals. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 3719–3723.Google Scholar
7.Vikas, B and Vakula, D (2017) Performance comparison of MUSIC and ESPRIT algorithms in presence of coherent signals for DoA estimation. In 2017 Int. Conf. Electron. Commun. Aerosp. Technol., pp. 403–405.Google Scholar
8.Candes, EJ and Wakin, MB (2008) An introduction to compressive sampling. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 25, 21–30.Google Scholar
9.Carlin, M, Rocca, P, Oliveri, G, Viani, F and Massa, A (2013) Directions-of-arrival estimation through Bayesian compressive sensing strategies. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 61, 3828–3838.Google Scholar
10.Yang, Z, Li, J, Stoica, P and Xie, L (2016) Sparse methods for direction-of-arrival estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1609.09596.Google Scholar
11.Stoica, P, Babu, P and Li, J (2011) SPICE: a novel covariance-based sparse estimation method for array processing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 59, 629–638.Google Scholar
12.Stoica, P and Babu, P (2012) SPICE and LIKES: two hyperparameter-free methods for sparse-parameter estimation. Signal Processing 92, 1580–1590.Google Scholar
13.Cui, H, Duan, H and Liu, H (2016) Off-grid DOA estimation using temporal block sparse Bayesian inference. 2016 IEEE Int. Conf. Digit. Signal Process., pp. 204–207.Google Scholar
14.Yang, Z, Xie, L and Zhang, C (2013) Off-grid direction of arrival estimation using sparse Bayesian inference. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 61, 38–43.Google Scholar
15.Yang, Z, Xie, L and Zhang, C (2014) A discretization-free sparse and parametric approach for linear array signal processing. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 62, 4959–4973.Google Scholar
16.Yang, Z and Xie, L (2017) On gridless sparse methods for multi-snapshot direction of arrival estimation. Circuits, Systems, and Signal Processing 36, 3370–3384.Google Scholar
17.Zhou, H and Wen, B (2014) Calibration of antenna pattern and phase errors of a cross-loop/monopole antenna array in high-frequency surface wave radars. IET Radar, Sonar & Navigation 8, 407–414.Google Scholar
18.Lemma, AN, Deprettere, EF and van der Veen, AJ (1999) Experimental analysis of antenna coupling for high-resolution DOA estimation algorithms. 1999 2nd IEEE Work. Signal Process. Adv. Wirel. Commun. (Cat. No. 99EX304), pp. 362–365.Google Scholar
19.Peng, W, Gao, Y, Qu, Y and Guo, C (2017) Array calibration with sensor gain and phase errors using invasive weed optimization algorithm. 2017 Sixth Asia-Pacific Conf. Antennas Propag., pp. 1–3.Google Scholar
20.Dai, Z, Su, W, Gu, H and Li, W (2016) Sensor gain-phase errors estimation using disjoint sources in unknown directions. IEEE Sensors Journal 16, 3724–3730.Google Scholar
21.Weiss, AJ and Friedlander, B (1990) Eigenstructure methods for direction finding with sensor gain and phase uncertainties. Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing 9, 271–300.Google Scholar
22.Li, Y and Er, MH (2006) Theoretical analyses of gain and phase error calibration with optimal implementation for linear equispaced array. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 54, 712–723.Google Scholar
23.Liao, B and Chan, SC (2012) Direction finding with partly calibrated uniform linear arrays. IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation 60, 922–929.Google Scholar
24.Liu, A, Liao, G, Zeng, C, Yang, Z and Xu, Q (2011) An eigenstructure method for estimating DOA and sensor gain-phase errors. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing 59, 5944–5956.Google Scholar
25.Hu, W and Xu, G (2018) DOA estimation with double L-shaped array based on Hadamard product and joint diagonalization in the presence of sensor gain-phase errors. Multidimensional Systems and Signal Processing.Google Scholar