Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:24:53.984Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Transitional (In)Justice: An Exploration of Blanket Amnesties and the Remaining Controversies Around the Spanish Transition to Democracy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Alexandra García
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

“Blanket amnesties” have generally been declared to be incompatible with international law due to the fact that they shield perpetrators of serious crimes from accountability as well as conflict with established principles regarding the applicability of statutory limitations to certain criminal offenses. The repeal of the Full Stop and Due Obedience laws in Argentina set a crucial precedent in the process toward the abrogation of legislation leading to impunity for those responsible for grave violations of jus cogens. Additionally, permitting the prosecutions of Nazi officers Klaus Barbie and Erich Priebke in Europe confirmed the customary principle of the non-applicability of statutory limitations to crimes against humanity. However, for nearly 40 years, Spain's amnesty legislation continues to preclude any investigation or prosecution of the crimes committed during the civil war (1936–1939) and the Francoist regime (1939–1975). Spain's 1977 Amnesty Act has been widely characterized as a blanket amnesty and remains in force today despite allegations of noncompliance with international law and numerous requests from United Nations bodies to repeal it. This article explores the history of Spain's 1977 Amnesty Act, compares and contrasts it with other nations with similar amnesties, and makes the case that a successful transition from an authoritarian regime to a peaceful democracy is feasible without the use of overly broad “blanket” amnesties.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 43 , Issue 2_3 , Summer_Winter 2015 , pp. 75 - 135
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Part VI: Bibliography

Barahonda de Brito, A., Aguilar Fernández, P. et González Enríquez, C. (eds.), Las políticas hacia el pasado. Juicios, depuraciones, perdón y olvido en las nuevas democracias (Itsmo, 2002).Google Scholar
Cherif Bassiouni, M. (ed.), Introduction to International Criminal Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2nd ed. 2013).Google Scholar
Colomer, J.M., La transición española: el modelo español (Anagrama, 1998).Google Scholar
Del Águila, R. Montoro, R., et El discurso político de la transición española. (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Siglo Veintiuno de España Editores, S.A., 1st ed. 1984).Google Scholar
Dominguez Rama, A., Enrique Ruano: Memoria viva de la impunidad del franquismo (Editorial Complutense, S.A., 1st ed. 2011).Google Scholar
Editorial Amnistía Internacional, Crímenes sin castigo. homicidios políticos y desapariciones forzadas (EDAI eds., 1st ed. 1993).Google Scholar
Gil Gil, A., Bases para la persecución penal de crímenes internacionales en españa. (Editorial Comares, S.L. Biblioteca Comares de Ciencia Jurídica. Estudios de Derecho Penal y Criminología, 1st ed. 2006).Google Scholar
Gil Gil, A., La justicia de transición en España. De la amnistía a la memoria histórica. (Atelier, 1st ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Gracia Martín, L., Lecciones de consecuencias jurídicas del delito en el nuevo Código Penal español (2000).Google Scholar
Ignacio Anitua, G. et al, Derecho Penal Internacional y Memoria Histórica. Desafíos del pasado y retos del futuro. (Fabian J. Di Placido. Buenos Aires, 1st ed. 2012).Google Scholar
Kornbluh, P., The Pinochet File: A Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability. (The New Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Martín García, O.J. et Ortiz Heras, M. (coords.), Claves internacionales en la transición española. (Catarata, 1st ed. 2010).Google Scholar
Morán, G., El precio de la transición. (Planeta, 1991).Google Scholar
Oñate Rubalcaba, P., Consenso e ideología en la transición política española. (BOE. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1st ed. 1998).Google Scholar
Pigrau Solé, A., La jurisdicción universal y su aplicación en españa. La persecución del genocidio, los crímenes de guerra y los crímenes contra la humanidad por los tribunales nacionales. (Col·lecció Recerca per Drets Humans (RxDH), 1st ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Powell, C., El piloto del cambio. El Rey, la Monarquía y la transición a la democracia (Editorial Planeta, 1991).Google Scholar
Ruiz-Huerta Carbonell, A., Los ángulos ciegos. una perspectiva crítica de la transición española (1976–1979). (Editorial Biblioteca Nueva. Colección El Arquero. Fundación José Ortega y Gasset, 1st ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Sánchez Navarro, A.J., La transición española en sus documentos. (BOE. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1st ed. 1998).Google Scholar
Santos, J., Memoria de la guerra y del franquismo. (Taurus, 2006).Google Scholar
Sobremonte Martínez, J.E., Indultos y amnistía. (Colección de Estudios. Instituto de Criminología y Departamento de Derecho Penal. Universidad de Valencia, 1st ed. 1980).Google Scholar
Tezanos, J.F, Cotarelo, R. et De Blas, A. (eds.), La transición democrática española. (Editorial Sistema. Fundación Sistema, 1st ed. 1989).Google Scholar
Aguilar Fernandez, P., Collective Memory of the Spanish Civil War: The Case of the Political Amnesty in the Spanish Transition to Democracy, 4 democratization, 88–109 (1997).Google Scholar
Burke-White, W. W., Reframing Impunity: Applying Liberal International Law Theory to An Analysis of Amnesty Legislation, 42 harv. Int'l L. J., 467–533 (2001).Google Scholar
Chinchón Alvarez, J., El viaje a ninguna parte: Memoria, leyes, historia y olvido sobre la guerra civil y el pasado autoritario en España. Un examen desde el derecho internacional. 45 Revista Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, 119–233 (2007).Google Scholar
Dugard, J., Dealing With Crimes of a Past Regime. Is Amnesty Still an Option?, 12 Leiden J. Int'l L., 1001–1015 (1999).Google Scholar
Hayner, P., Fifteen Truth Commissions—1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study, 16 human Rights quarterly, 600 (1994).Google Scholar
Keiseng Rakate, P., Is the Sierra Leonean Amnesty Law Compatible with International Law?, 3 MenschenRechtsMagazin, 151–154 (2000).Google Scholar
Laplante, L.J., Outlawing Amnesty: The Return of Criminal Justice in Transitional Justice Schemes, 49 Va. J. Int'l L., 915–984 (2009).Google Scholar
Lyons, S.W., Ineffective Amnesty: The Legal Impact on Negotiating the End to Conflict, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev., 799–842 (2012).Google Scholar
Meintjes, G. & Méndez, J.E., Reconciling Amnesties with Universal Jurisdiction, 2 Int'l L. F. D. Int'l, 76–97 (2000).Google Scholar
Meisenberg, S. M., Legality of Amnesties in International Humanitarian Law: the Lomé Amnesty Decision of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, 86 ICRC Current Issues and Comments, 837–851 (2004).Google Scholar
Pinelli, C., Legal Treatment of Past Political Violence and Comparative Constitutionalism, 12 Comp. L. Rev. (2011).Google Scholar
Quinn, R.J., Will the Rule of Law End? Challenging Grants of Amnesty for Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime: Chile's New Model, 62 Fordham L. Rev., Issue 4 (1994).Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N., The Spanish Civil War, Amnesty and the Trials of Judge Garzón, 16 Insights Am. Soc. Int'l L., Issue 24 (2012).Google Scholar
Slye, R.C., The Legitimacy of Amnesties Under International Law and General Principles of Anglo-American Law: Is A Legitimate Amnesty Possible?, 43 Va. J. Int'l L. 173 (2002).Google Scholar
Yarbrough, S., Amnesty or Accountability: The Fate of High-Ranking Child Soldiers in Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army, 47 Vand. J. Transnat'l L., 531–568 (2004).Google Scholar
Powell, Ch., “Reform Versus Ruptura in Spain's Transition to Democracy”, Thesis, University of Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Smith, R.W., “From Truth to Justice: How Does Amnesty Factor In? A Comparative Analysis of South Africa and Sierra Leone's Truth and Reconciliation Commissions”, Political Science Honors Thesis, University of Connecticut - Storrs, 2010.Google Scholar
Agreement between the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone and Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, Jan. 16, 2002.Google Scholar
Control Council Law, No. 10, Punishment of Persons Guilty of War Crimes, Crimes Against Peace and Against Humanity, Dec. 20, 1945, 3 Official Gazette, Control Council for Germany 50–55 (1946).Google Scholar
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Nov. 4, 1950, CETS No. 194 (1950).Google Scholar
European Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitation to Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes, Council of Europe, Jan. 25, 1974, CETS No. 082 (1974).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention I: for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 75 U.N.T.S. 31, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention II: for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded and Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, 75 U.N.T.S. 85, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention III: Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention IV: Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in time of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 287, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, Dec. 20, 2006, U.N. Doc. A/61/448 (2006).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.Google Scholar
Instrumento de Ratificación de España del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos, hecho en Nueva York el 19 de Diciembre de 1966, B.O.E. n° 103, de 30 de abril de 1977, páginas 9337 a 9343 (Spain's Instrument of Ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature at New York on December 19, 1966, Official Bulletin of the State number 103, April 30, 1977, at 9337–9343).Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, created by the Agreement for Prosecution and Punishment of Major War Criminals of the European Axis, Aug. 8, 1945: Charter of the International Military Tribunal, 59 Stat. 1544, 82 U.N.T.S. 279.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal for the Far East, established by order of General Douglas MacArthur, Jan. 19, 1946: Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, T.I.A.S. No. 1589.Google Scholar
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 1125 U.N.T.S. 3, entered into force Dec. 7, 1978.Google Scholar
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 1125 U.N.T.S. 609, entered into force Dec. 7, 1978.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, Nov. 26, 1968, 754 U.N.T.S. 73.Google Scholar
Peace Agreement Between the Goveernment of Sierra Leone and the Revolutionary United Front of Sierra Leone. Lome, Togo. 7 June 1999.Google Scholar
United Nations, Chapter IV. Human Rights. 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations Treaty Collection, https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?chapter=4&src=treaty&mtdsg_no=iv-4&lang=en (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations, Chapter IV. Human Rights. 6. Convention on the non-applicability of statutory limitations to war crimes and crimes against humanity, United nations Treaty Collection, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-6&chapter=4&lang=en (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations, Member States of the United Nations, http://www.un.org/en/members/ (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations, Rule-of-law Tools for Post-Conflict States. Amnesties, HR/PUB/09/1, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. New York and Geneva (2009).Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 1/95, ¶ 3, U.N. Doc. A/RES/1/95 (Dec. 11, 1946). Affirmation of the Principles of International Law Recognized by the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 260/3, U.N. Doc. A/RES/260/3 (Dec. 9, 1948). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 23/2391, ¶ 2, U.N. Doc. A/RES/23/2391 (Nov. 26, 1968). Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 28/3074, ¶ 4, U.N. Doc. A/RES/28/3074 (Dec. 3, 1973). Principles of international cooperation in the detection, arrest, extradition and punishment of persons guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 39/46, U.N. Doc. A/RES/39/46 (Dec. 10, 1984). Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 44/162, ¶ 9, U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/162 (Dec. 15, 1989). Human rights in the administration of justice. Endorsement of the Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions set forth in the Annex to Economic and Social Council Resolution 1989/65 of 24 May 1989.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 47/133, ¶ 11, U.N. Doc. A/RES/47/133 (Feb. 12, 1993). Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.Google Scholar
G.A. Res. 60/147, U.N. Doc. A/RES/60/147 (Dec. 16, 2005). Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 19th Session. Report of the Human Rights Council on its nineteenth session. Annex V. Special procedures mandate holders appointed by the Human Rights Council at its nineteenth session. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/19/2 (May 24, 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 24th Session. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/24/42 (Aug. 28, 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 27th Session. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. Mission to Spain. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/27/56/Add.l (July 22, 2014).Google Scholar
Seventh Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Observer Mission in Sierra Leone, S/1999/836, 30 July 1999.Google Scholar
S. C. Res. 1315, on the situation in Sierra Leone, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1315 (Aug. 14, 2000).Google Scholar
OHCHR News, Observaciones preliminares del Relator Especial para la promoción de la verdad, la justicia, la reparación y las garantías de no repetición, Pablo de Greiff, al concluir su visita oficial a España, Office of the High Comissioner for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14216& (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
OHCHR News, UN transitional justice expert Pablo de Greiff in first official visit to Spain, Office of the High Comissioner for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14180&LangID=E (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations Publication. HR/PUB/09/1 Sales No. E.09.XIV.1 ISBN 978-92-1-154187-8 (New York and Geneva, 2009).Google Scholar
Commission on human Rights. Preliminary report on the Thirty-Eighth Session by Mr. Louis Joinet, Special Rapporteur: Study on amnesty laws and their role in the safeguard and promotion of human rights. U.N. ESCOR, 38th Sess., Supp. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/ 1985/16 (1985).Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights. Report of the independent expert to update the Set of principles to combat impunity, Diane Orentlicher. Addendum: Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. U.N. ESCOR, 61st Sess., Supp. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1 (2005).Google Scholar
Committee Against Torture. 43rd Session. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention. Concluding observations of the Committee against Torture. Spain. U.N. Doc. CAT/C/ESP/CO/5 (2009).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. 74th Session. Concluding observations on the report submitted by Spain under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention. U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/CO/1 (2013).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. List of issues in relation to the report submitted by Spain under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention (CED/C7ESP/1). U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/Q/1 (2013).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. Report of State parties pursuant to article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention due in 2012. Spain. U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/1 (2012).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Arhuacos v. Colombia, communication No. 612/1995, 29 July 1997.Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Bautista de Arellana v. Colombia, communication No. 563/1993, 27 October 1995 Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Consideration of the reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant. Comments on Argentina. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.46 (1995).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. 94th Session. Consideration of the reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee. Spain. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/ESP/CO/5 (2009).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 20 on Article 7, 44th Sess. (1992), Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/ Rev.1 at 30 (1994).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 31, 80th Sess. (2004), Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13 (2004).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Second periodic reports of States parties due in 1992: Argentina. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/75/Add.1 (State party report) (1994).Google Scholar
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, Jul. 12, 1993. U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 157/23.Google Scholar
Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (Informe Rettig) [Report of the National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation (Rettig Report)], Programa de derechos humanos. Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Pública. Gobierno de Chile, http://www.ddhh.gov.cl/ddhh_rettig.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. Drafted by Louis Joinet, Oct. 2, 1997. U. N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.1.Google Scholar
Updated set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. Report of Diane Orentlicher, independent expert to update the set of principles to combat impunity, Feb. 8, 2005. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.l.Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1931 (Dec. 9, 1931).Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1978 (Dec. 29, 1978).Google Scholar
Real Decreto-Ley 10/1976, de 30 de julio, sobre Amnistía, B.O.E. n° 186, de 4 de agosto de 1976 [Royal Decree-Law 10/1976, Jul. 30, on Amnesty, Official Bulletin of the State number 186, Aug. 4, 1976].Google Scholar
Ley 46/1977, de 15 de octubre, de Amnistía, B.O.E. n° 248, de 17 de octubre de 1977 [Law 46/1977, Oct. 15, of Amnesty, Official Bulletin of the State number 248, Oct 17, 1997].Google Scholar
Real Decreto 19/1977, de 14 de marzo, sobre medidas de gracia, B.O.E. n° 65, de 17 de marzo de 1977, páginas 6201–6202 [Royal Decree 19/1977, Mar. 14, on clemency measures, Official Bulletin of the State number 65, Mar. 17, 1977, at 6201–6202].Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica 6/1985, de 1 de julio, del Poder Judicial [Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary].Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal [Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Ley 52/2007, de 26 de diciembre, por la que se reconocen y amplían derechos y se establecen medidas en favor de quienes padecieron persecución o violencia durante la guerra civil y la dictadura (“Ley de la Memoria Histórica”) [Law 52/2007, of December 26, whereby the rights of those who suffered persecution or violence during the civil war and the dictatorship are recognized and extended, and measures in their favor are established (“Historical Memory Law “)].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Auto (Sección 2a), de 19 de diciembre de 1995 [Provincial Court of Madrid. Order, Section 2, Dec. 19, 1995].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Sentencia n° 308/96 (19-VII-1996) [Provincial Court of Madrid. Judgment 308/96 (19-VII-1996)].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Providencia de 28 de julio de 1998, Procedimiento Sumario 19/97 [National High Court. Order, Central Court of Investigation No. 5, Order of July 28, 1998, Summary Procedure 19/97].Google Scholar
Ausiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Auto de 16 de octubre de 1998 [National High Court. Central Court of Investigation No. 5. Order of October 16th, 1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 3.a, Auto de 4 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 84/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 3, Order of November 4, 1998, Appeal 84/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 1.a, Auto de 5 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 173/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 1, Order of November 5, 1998, Appeal 173/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sentencia de 16 de abril de 2005 [National High Court. Judgement on April 16, 2005].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 25 de febrero de 2003 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 25 2003].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 1 de octubre de 2007 [Supreme Court. Judgement on October 1, 2007].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2012 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 16 2005].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.049, de 9 de febrero de 1084 [Law No. 23.049 (February 9, 1984)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.492, de Punto Final, de 23 de diciembre de 1986 [Law No. 23.492: Full Stop law (December 23, 1986)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.521, de Obediencia Debida, de 4 de junio de 1987 [Law No. 23.521: Law of Due Obedience (June 4, 1987)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 25.779, de 21 de agosto de 2003 [Law No. 25.779 (August 21, 2003)].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 2 de noviembre de 1995 [Supreme Court. Judgement of November 2, 1995].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 14 de junio de 2005 [Supreme Court. Judgement of June 14, 2005].Google Scholar
Juzgado Nacional en lo Criminal y Correccional Federal 4. Auto de 6 de marzo de 2001. Juez Gabriel Cavallo. Causa Nro. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio s/sustracción de menores de 10 años” del registro de la Secretaría 7 [Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 4. Order of Mar. 6, 2001. Judge Gabriel Cavallo. Case No. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio on abduction of children under 10” Register of the Secretariat 7].Google Scholar
Decreto-Ley N°. 2191, de Amnistía, de 18 de abril de 1978. Diario Oficial No. 30.042 [Decree-Law No. 2191, of Amnesty (April 18, 1978). Official Journal No. 30,042].Google Scholar
Loi No. 64–1326 du 26 décembre 1964 tendant à constater l'imprescriptibilité des crimes contre l'humanité (1). Version consolidée au 29 décembre 1964 [Act No. 64–1326 of 26 December 1964, determining the non-applicability of statutory limitations to crimes against humanity (1). Consolidated version of 29 December 1964].Google Scholar
Cour de Cassation. Arrět du 20 décembre 1985 [Supreme Court. Judgement of December 20, 1985].Google Scholar
Cour d'Appel de Lyon. Arrět du 4 octobre 1985 [Court of Appeal of Lyon. Judgement of October 4, 1985].Google Scholar
Tribunale Militare di Roma. Sentenza, 22 iuglio 1997 [Military Tribunal of Rome. Judgement of July 22, 1997].Google Scholar
Corte Militare di Appello di Roma. Sentenza, 7 marzo 1998 [Military Court of Appeals. Judgement of March 7, 1998].Google Scholar
Corte di Cassazione. Sentenza, 16 novembre 1998 [Court of Cassation. Judgement of November 16, 1998].Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995, http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1995-034.pdf (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Explanatory Memorandum To The Parliamentary Bill, http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/legal/bill.htm (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Azanian Peoples Organisation (Azapo) And Others v. The President Of The Republic Of South Africa. CCT 17/96. Constitutional Court. 25 July 1996.Google Scholar
High Court of Justice. Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court. In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjicendum. Re: Augusto Pinochet Duarte. October 28th, 1998.Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 3 W.L.R. 1456 (H.L. 1998).Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 2 W.L.R. 272 (H.L. 1999).Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 2 W.L.R. 827 (H.L. 1999).Google Scholar
Bow Street Magistrates’ Court. The Kingdom of Spain v. Augusto Pinochet Ugarte. October 8th, 1999.Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Dražen Erdemović, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, IT-96-22, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Li (Appeals Chamber, 7 October 1997).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, International Criminal Court for the former Yugoslavia, IT-94-1, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction (Appeals Chamber, 2 October 1995).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Morris Kallon and Birma Buzzy Kamara, Special Court for Sierra Leone, SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E) and SCSL-2004-16-AR72(E), Decision on the challenge to Jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty (Appeals Chamber, 13 March 2004).Google Scholar
Case of Velasquez-Rodriguez. Velasquez-Rodriguez v. Honduras, Inter-Am. Ct. H. R. (Ser. C) (1988).Google Scholar
Case of Almonacid Arellano and others. Almonacid Arellano and others v. Chile, Inter-Am. Ct. H. R. (2006).Google Scholar
BBC NEWS. 'Chile Caravan of Death: Eight guilty of murder'. December 23, 2013. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-25499373 (last visited August 26, 2015).Google Scholar
BBC NEWS. 'Pinochet “unfit to face trial”'. January 12, 2000. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/599526.stm (last visited August 26, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Archivo. 'Absueltos por falta de pruebas los policías acusados de la muerte de Ruano', by Yoldi, José. July 25, 1996. http://elpais.com/diario/1996/07/25/espana/838245619_850215.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Archivo. 'El Supremo eleva a 1.084 años la pena de Scilingo por crímenes contra la humanidad', by Yoldi, José. July 5, 2007. http://elpais.com/diario/2007/07/05/espana/1183586418_850215.html (last visited August 28, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Archivo. 'Reabierto el ‘caso Ruano’ 25 años después', by de la Cuadra, Bonifacio. January 28, 1994. http://elpais.com/diario/1994/01/28/espana/759711607_850215.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. España. 'Adolfo Scilingo, el recluso modelo que no se arrepiente de sus crímenes', by Manuel Altozano. March 28, 2015. http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2015/03/28/actualidad/1427535034_826071.html (last visited August 28, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Reportaje: Memoria Histórica. “No se tiró, lo mataron”, by Junquera, Natalia. January 17, 2009. http://elpais.com/diario/2009/01/18/domingo/1232254357_850215.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
'Statement on the release of General Pinochet'. Home Secretary Jack Straw. BBC News. March 2nd 2000.Google Scholar
The Washington Post. 'A Chilean Dictator's Dark Legacy', by Reel, Monte and Smith, J.Y. December 11, 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/10/AR2006121000302.html (last visited August 26, 2015).Google Scholar
Barahonda de Brito, A., Aguilar Fernández, P. et González Enríquez, C. (eds.), Las políticas hacia el pasado. Juicios, depuraciones, perdón y olvido en las nuevas democracias (Itsmo, 2002).Google Scholar
Cherif Bassiouni, M. (ed.), Introduction to International Criminal Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2nd ed. 2013).Google Scholar
Colomer, J.M., La transición española: el modelo español (Anagrama, 1998).Google Scholar
Del Águila, R. Montoro, R., et El discurso político de la transición española. (Centro de Investigaciones Sociológicas. Siglo Veintiuno de España Editores, S.A., 1st ed. 1984).Google Scholar
Dominguez Rama, A., Enrique Ruano: Memoria viva de la impunidad del franquismo (Editorial Complutense, S.A., 1st ed. 2011).Google Scholar
Editorial Amnistía Internacional, Crímenes sin castigo. homicidios políticos y desapariciones forzadas (EDAI eds., 1st ed. 1993).Google Scholar
Gil Gil, A., Bases para la persecución penal de crímenes internacionales en españa. (Editorial Comares, S.L. Biblioteca Comares de Ciencia Jurídica. Estudios de Derecho Penal y Criminología, 1st ed. 2006).Google Scholar
Gil Gil, A., La justicia de transición en España. De la amnistía a la memoria histórica. (Atelier, 1st ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Gracia Martín, L., Lecciones de consecuencias jurídicas del delito en el nuevo Código Penal español (2000).Google Scholar
Ignacio Anitua, G. et al, Derecho Penal Internacional y Memoria Histórica. Desafíos del pasado y retos del futuro. (Fabian J. Di Placido. Buenos Aires, 1st ed. 2012).Google Scholar
Kornbluh, P., The Pinochet File: A Declassified Dossier on Atrocity and Accountability. (The New Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Martín García, O.J. et Ortiz Heras, M. (coords.), Claves internacionales en la transición española. (Catarata, 1st ed. 2010).Google Scholar
Morán, G., El precio de la transición. (Planeta, 1991).Google Scholar
Oñate Rubalcaba, P., Consenso e ideología en la transición política española. (BOE. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1st ed. 1998).Google Scholar
Pigrau Solé, A., La jurisdicción universal y su aplicación en españa. La persecución del genocidio, los crímenes de guerra y los crímenes contra la humanidad por los tribunales nacionales. (Col·lecció Recerca per Drets Humans (RxDH), 1st ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Powell, C., El piloto del cambio. El Rey, la Monarquía y la transición a la democracia (Editorial Planeta, 1991).Google Scholar
Ruiz-Huerta Carbonell, A., Los ángulos ciegos. una perspectiva crítica de la transición española (1976–1979). (Editorial Biblioteca Nueva. Colección El Arquero. Fundación José Ortega y Gasset, 1st ed. 2009).Google Scholar
Sánchez Navarro, A.J., La transición española en sus documentos. (BOE. Centro de Estudios Políticos y Constitucionales, 1st ed. 1998).Google Scholar
Santos, J., Memoria de la guerra y del franquismo. (Taurus, 2006).Google Scholar
Sobremonte Martínez, J.E., Indultos y amnistía. (Colección de Estudios. Instituto de Criminología y Departamento de Derecho Penal. Universidad de Valencia, 1st ed. 1980).Google Scholar
Tezanos, J.F, Cotarelo, R. et De Blas, A. (eds.), La transición democrática española. (Editorial Sistema. Fundación Sistema, 1st ed. 1989).Google Scholar
Aguilar Fernandez, P., Collective Memory of the Spanish Civil War: The Case of the Political Amnesty in the Spanish Transition to Democracy, 4 democratization, 88–109 (1997).Google Scholar
Burke-White, W. W., Reframing Impunity: Applying Liberal International Law Theory to An Analysis of Amnesty Legislation, 42 harv. Int'l L. J., 467–533 (2001).Google Scholar
Chinchón Alvarez, J., El viaje a ninguna parte: Memoria, leyes, historia y olvido sobre la guerra civil y el pasado autoritario en España. Un examen desde el derecho internacional. 45 Revista Instituto Interamericano de Derechos Humanos, 119–233 (2007).Google Scholar
Dugard, J., Dealing With Crimes of a Past Regime. Is Amnesty Still an Option?, 12 Leiden J. Int'l L., 1001–1015 (1999).Google Scholar
Hayner, P., Fifteen Truth Commissions—1974 to 1994: A Comparative Study, 16 human Rights quarterly, 600 (1994).Google Scholar
Keiseng Rakate, P., Is the Sierra Leonean Amnesty Law Compatible with International Law?, 3 MenschenRechtsMagazin, 151–154 (2000).Google Scholar
Laplante, L.J., Outlawing Amnesty: The Return of Criminal Justice in Transitional Justice Schemes, 49 Va. J. Int'l L., 915–984 (2009).Google Scholar
Lyons, S.W., Ineffective Amnesty: The Legal Impact on Negotiating the End to Conflict, 47 Wake Forest L. Rev., 799–842 (2012).Google Scholar
Meintjes, G. & Méndez, J.E., Reconciling Amnesties with Universal Jurisdiction, 2 Int'l L. F. D. Int'l, 76–97 (2000).Google Scholar
Meisenberg, S. M., Legality of Amnesties in International Humanitarian Law: the Lomé Amnesty Decision of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, 86 ICRC Current Issues and Comments, 837–851 (2004).Google Scholar
Pinelli, C., Legal Treatment of Past Political Violence and Comparative Constitutionalism, 12 Comp. L. Rev. (2011).Google Scholar
Quinn, R.J., Will the Rule of Law End? Challenging Grants of Amnesty for Human Rights Violations of a Prior Regime: Chile's New Model, 62 Fordham L. Rev., Issue 4 (1994).Google Scholar
Roht-Arriaza, N., The Spanish Civil War, Amnesty and the Trials of Judge Garzón, 16 Insights Am. Soc. Int'l L., Issue 24 (2012).Google Scholar
Slye, R.C., The Legitimacy of Amnesties Under International Law and General Principles of Anglo-American Law: Is A Legitimate Amnesty Possible?, 43 Va. J. Int'l L. 173 (2002).Google Scholar
Yarbrough, S., Amnesty or Accountability: The Fate of High-Ranking Child Soldiers in Uganda's Lord's Resistance Army, 47 Vand. J. Transnat'l L., 531–568 (2004).Google Scholar
Powell, Ch., “Reform Versus Ruptura in Spain's Transition to Democracy”, Thesis, University of Oxford, 1989.Google Scholar
Smith, R.W., “From Truth to Justice: How Does Amnesty Factor In? A Comparative Analysis of South Africa and Sierra Leone's Truth and Reconciliation Commissions”, Political Science Honors Thesis, University of Connecticut - Storrs, 2010.Google Scholar
Agreement between the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone and Statute of the Special Court for Sierra Leone, Jan. 16, 2002.Google Scholar
Control Council Law, No. 10, Punishment of Persons Guilty of War Crimes, Crimes Against Peace and Against Humanity, Dec. 20, 1945, 3 Official Gazette, Control Council for Germany 50–55 (1946).Google Scholar
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms, Nov. 4, 1950, CETS No. 194 (1950).Google Scholar
European Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitation to Crimes against Humanity and War Crimes, Council of Europe, Jan. 25, 1974, CETS No. 082 (1974).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention I: for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded and Sick in Armed Forces in the Field, 75 U.N.T.S. 31, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention II: for the Amelioration of the Condition of Wounded and Sick and Shipwrecked Members of Armed Forces at Sea, 75 U.N.T.S. 85, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention III: Relative to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 135, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
Geneva Convention IV: Relative to the Protection of Civilian Persons in time of War, 75 U.N.T.S. 287, entered into force Oct. 21, 1950 (1949).Google Scholar
International Convention for the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance, Dec. 20, 2006, U.N. Doc. A/61/448 (2006).Google Scholar
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, Dec. 16, 1966, 999 U.N.T.S. 171.Google Scholar
Instrumento de Ratificación de España del Pacto Internacional de Derechos Civiles y Políticos, hecho en Nueva York el 19 de Diciembre de 1966, B.O.E. n° 103, de 30 de abril de 1977, páginas 9337 a 9343 (Spain's Instrument of Ratification of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, opened for signature at New York on December 19, 1966, Official Bulletin of the State number 103, April 30, 1977, at 9337–9343).Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, created by the Agreement for Prosecution and Punishment of Major War Criminals of the European Axis, Aug. 8, 1945: Charter of the International Military Tribunal, 59 Stat. 1544, 82 U.N.T.S. 279.Google Scholar
International Military Tribunal for the Far East, established by order of General Douglas MacArthur, Jan. 19, 1946: Charter of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, T.I.A.S. No. 1589.Google Scholar
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 1125 U.N.T.S. 3, entered into force Dec. 7, 1978.Google Scholar
Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II), 1125 U.N.T.S. 609, entered into force Dec. 7, 1978.Google Scholar
United Nations Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity, Nov. 26, 1968, 754 U.N.T.S. 73.Google Scholar
Peace Agreement Between the Goveernment of Sierra Leone and the Revolutionary United Front of Sierra Leone. Lome, Togo. 7 June 1999.Google Scholar
United Nations, Chapter IV. Human Rights. 4. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, United Nations Treaty Collection, https://treaties.un.org/pages/viewdetails.aspx?chapter=4&src=treaty&mtdsg_no=iv-4&lang=en (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations, Chapter IV. Human Rights. 6. Convention on the non-applicability of statutory limitations to war crimes and crimes against humanity, United nations Treaty Collection, https://treaties.un.org/pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-6&chapter=4&lang=en (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations, Member States of the United Nations, http://www.un.org/en/members/ (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations, Rule-of-law Tools for Post-Conflict States. Amnesties, HR/PUB/09/1, Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. New York and Geneva (2009).Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 1/95, ¶ 3, U.N. Doc. A/RES/1/95 (Dec. 11, 1946). Affirmation of the Principles of International Law Recognized by the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 260/3, U.N. Doc. A/RES/260/3 (Dec. 9, 1948). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 23/2391, ¶ 2, U.N. Doc. A/RES/23/2391 (Nov. 26, 1968). Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 28/3074, ¶ 4, U.N. Doc. A/RES/28/3074 (Dec. 3, 1973). Principles of international cooperation in the detection, arrest, extradition and punishment of persons guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 39/46, U.N. Doc. A/RES/39/46 (Dec. 10, 1984). Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 44/162, ¶ 9, U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/162 (Dec. 15, 1989). Human rights in the administration of justice. Endorsement of the Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions set forth in the Annex to Economic and Social Council Resolution 1989/65 of 24 May 1989.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 47/133, ¶ 11, U.N. Doc. A/RES/47/133 (Feb. 12, 1993). Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.Google Scholar
G.A. Res. 60/147, U.N. Doc. A/RES/60/147 (Dec. 16, 2005). Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 19th Session. Report of the Human Rights Council on its nineteenth session. Annex V. Special procedures mandate holders appointed by the Human Rights Council at its nineteenth session. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/19/2 (May 24, 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 24th Session. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/24/42 (Aug. 28, 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 27th Session. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. Mission to Spain. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/27/56/Add.l (July 22, 2014).Google Scholar
Seventh Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Observer Mission in Sierra Leone, S/1999/836, 30 July 1999.Google Scholar
S. C. Res. 1315, on the situation in Sierra Leone, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1315 (Aug. 14, 2000).Google Scholar
OHCHR News, Observaciones preliminares del Relator Especial para la promoción de la verdad, la justicia, la reparación y las garantías de no repetición, Pablo de Greiff, al concluir su visita oficial a España, Office of the High Comissioner for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14216& (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
OHCHR News, UN transitional justice expert Pablo de Greiff in first official visit to Spain, Office of the High Comissioner for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14180&LangID=E (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations Publication. HR/PUB/09/1 Sales No. E.09.XIV.1 ISBN 978-92-1-154187-8 (New York and Geneva, 2009).Google Scholar
Commission on human Rights. Preliminary report on the Thirty-Eighth Session by Mr. Louis Joinet, Special Rapporteur: Study on amnesty laws and their role in the safeguard and promotion of human rights. U.N. ESCOR, 38th Sess., Supp. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/ 1985/16 (1985).Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights. Report of the independent expert to update the Set of principles to combat impunity, Diane Orentlicher. Addendum: Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. U.N. ESCOR, 61st Sess., Supp. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1 (2005).Google Scholar
Committee Against Torture. 43rd Session. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention. Concluding observations of the Committee against Torture. Spain. U.N. Doc. CAT/C/ESP/CO/5 (2009).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. 74th Session. Concluding observations on the report submitted by Spain under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention. U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/CO/1 (2013).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. List of issues in relation to the report submitted by Spain under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention (CED/C7ESP/1). U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/Q/1 (2013).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. Report of State parties pursuant to article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention due in 2012. Spain. U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/1 (2012).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Arhuacos v. Colombia, communication No. 612/1995, 29 July 1997.Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Bautista de Arellana v. Colombia, communication No. 563/1993, 27 October 1995 Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Consideration of the reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant. Comments on Argentina. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.46 (1995).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. 94th Session. Consideration of the reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee. Spain. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/ESP/CO/5 (2009).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 20 on Article 7, 44th Sess. (1992), Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/ Rev.1 at 30 (1994).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 31, 80th Sess. (2004), Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13 (2004).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Second periodic reports of States parties due in 1992: Argentina. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/75/Add.1 (State party report) (1994).Google Scholar
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, Jul. 12, 1993. U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 157/23.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 1/95, ¶ 3, U.N. Doc. A/RES/1/95 (Dec. 11, 1946). Affirmation of the Principles of International Law Recognized by the Charter of the Nürnberg Tribunal.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 260/3, U.N. Doc. A/RES/260/3 (Dec. 9, 1948). Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 23/2391, ¶ 2, U.N. Doc. A/RES/23/2391 (Nov. 26, 1968). Convention on the Non-Applicability of Statutory Limitations to War Crimes and Crimes Against Humanity.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 28/3074, ¶ 4, U.N. Doc. A/RES/28/3074 (Dec. 3, 1973). Principles of international cooperation in the detection, arrest, extradition and punishment of persons guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 39/46, U.N. Doc. A/RES/39/46 (Dec. 10, 1984). Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 44/162, ¶ 9, U.N. Doc. A/RES/44/162 (Dec. 15, 1989). Human rights in the administration of justice. Endorsement of the Principles on the Effective Prevention and Investigation of Extra-legal, Arbitrary and Summary Executions set forth in the Annex to Economic and Social Council Resolution 1989/65 of 24 May 1989.Google Scholar
G. A. Res. 47/133, ¶ 11, U.N. Doc. A/RES/47/133 (Feb. 12, 1993). Declaration on the Protection of All Persons from Enforced Disappearance.Google Scholar
G.A. Res. 60/147, U.N. Doc. A/RES/60/147 (Dec. 16, 2005). Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law.Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 19th Session. Report of the Human Rights Council on its nineteenth session. Annex V. Special procedures mandate holders appointed by the Human Rights Council at its nineteenth session. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/19/2 (May 24, 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 24th Session. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/24/42 (Aug. 28, 2013).Google Scholar
Human Rights Council. 27th Session. Report of the Special Rapporteur on the promotion of truth, justice, reparation and guarantees of non-recurrence, Pablo de Greiff. Mission to Spain. U.N. Doc. A/HRC/27/56/Add.l (July 22, 2014).Google Scholar
Seventh Report of the Secretary-General on the United Nations Observer Mission in Sierra Leone, S/1999/836, 30 July 1999.Google Scholar
S. C. Res. 1315, on the situation in Sierra Leone, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1315 (Aug. 14, 2000).Google Scholar
OHCHR News, Observaciones preliminares del Relator Especial para la promoción de la verdad, la justicia, la reparación y las garantías de no repetición, Pablo de Greiff, al concluir su visita oficial a España, Office of the High Comissioner for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14216& (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
OHCHR News, UN transitional justice expert Pablo de Greiff in first official visit to Spain, Office of the High Comissioner for Human Rights, http://www.ohchr.org/EN/NewsEvents/Pages/DisplayNews.aspx?NewsID=14180&LangID=E (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Rule-of-Law Tools for Post-Conflict States: Amnesties. United Nations Publication. HR/PUB/09/1 Sales No. E.09.XIV.1 ISBN 978-92-1-154187-8 (New York and Geneva, 2009).Google Scholar
Commission on human Rights. Preliminary report on the Thirty-Eighth Session by Mr. Louis Joinet, Special Rapporteur: Study on amnesty laws and their role in the safeguard and promotion of human rights. U.N. ESCOR, 38th Sess., Supp. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/ 1985/16 (1985).Google Scholar
Commission on Human Rights. Report of the independent expert to update the Set of principles to combat impunity, Diane Orentlicher. Addendum: Updated Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. U.N. ESCOR, 61st Sess., Supp. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1 (2005).Google Scholar
Committee Against Torture. 43rd Session. Consideration of reports submitted by States parties under article 19 of the Convention. Concluding observations of the Committee against Torture. Spain. U.N. Doc. CAT/C/ESP/CO/5 (2009).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. 74th Session. Concluding observations on the report submitted by Spain under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention. U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/CO/1 (2013).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. List of issues in relation to the report submitted by Spain under article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention (CED/C7ESP/1). U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/Q/1 (2013).Google Scholar
Committee on Enforced Disappearances. Report of State parties pursuant to article 29, paragraph 1, of the Convention due in 2012. Spain. U.N. Doc. CED/C/ESP/1 (2012).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Arhuacos v. Colombia, communication No. 612/1995, 29 July 1997.Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Bautista de Arellana v. Colombia, communication No. 563/1993, 27 October 1995 Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Consideration of the reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant. Comments on Argentina. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/79/Add.46 (1995).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. 94th Session. Consideration of the reports submitted by States parties under article 40 of the Covenant. Concluding observations of the Human Rights Committee. Spain. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/ESP/CO/5 (2009).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 20 on Article 7, 44th Sess. (1992), Compilation of General Comments and General Recommendations Adopted by Human Rights Treaty Bodies, U.N. Doc. HRI/GEN/1/ Rev.1 at 30 (1994).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. General Comment No. 31, 80th Sess. (2004), Nature of the General Legal Obligation on States Parties to the Covenant, U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/21/Rev.1/Add. 13 (2004).Google Scholar
Human Rights Committee. Second periodic reports of States parties due in 1992: Argentina. U.N. Doc. CCPR/C/75/Add.1 (State party report) (1994).Google Scholar
Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, Jul. 12, 1993. U.N. Doc. A/CONF. 157/23.Google Scholar
Informe de la Comisión Nacional de Verdad y Reconciliación (Informe Rettig) [Report of the National Commission on Truth and Reconciliation (Rettig Report)], Programa de derechos humanos. Ministerio del Interior y Seguridad Pública. Gobierno de Chile, http://www.ddhh.gov.cl/ddhh_rettig.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. Drafted by Louis Joinet, Oct. 2, 1997. U. N. Doc. E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.1.Google Scholar
Updated set of principles for the protection and promotion of human rights through action to combat impunity. Report of Diane Orentlicher, independent expert to update the set of principles to combat impunity, Feb. 8, 2005. U.N. Doc. E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.l.Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1931 (Dec. 9, 1931).Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1978 (Dec. 29, 1978).Google Scholar
Real Decreto-Ley 10/1976, de 30 de julio, sobre Amnistía, B.O.E. n° 186, de 4 de agosto de 1976 [Royal Decree-Law 10/1976, Jul. 30, on Amnesty, Official Bulletin of the State number 186, Aug. 4, 1976].Google Scholar
Ley 46/1977, de 15 de octubre, de Amnistía, B.O.E. n° 248, de 17 de octubre de 1977 [Law 46/1977, Oct. 15, of Amnesty, Official Bulletin of the State number 248, Oct 17, 1997].Google Scholar
Real Decreto 19/1977, de 14 de marzo, sobre medidas de gracia, B.O.E. n° 65, de 17 de marzo de 1977, páginas 6201–6202 [Royal Decree 19/1977, Mar. 14, on clemency measures, Official Bulletin of the State number 65, Mar. 17, 1977, at 6201–6202].Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica 6/1985, de 1 de julio, del Poder Judicial [Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary].Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal [Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Ley 52/2007, de 26 de diciembre, por la que se reconocen y amplían derechos y se establecen medidas en favor de quienes padecieron persecución o violencia durante la guerra civil y la dictadura (“Ley de la Memoria Histórica”) [Law 52/2007, of December 26, whereby the rights of those who suffered persecution or violence during the civil war and the dictatorship are recognized and extended, and measures in their favor are established (“Historical Memory Law “)].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Auto (Sección 2a), de 19 de diciembre de 1995 [Provincial Court of Madrid. Order, Section 2, Dec. 19, 1995].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Sentencia n° 308/96 (19-VII-1996) [Provincial Court of Madrid. Judgment 308/96 (19-VII-1996)].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Providencia de 28 de julio de 1998, Procedimiento Sumario 19/97 [National High Court. Order, Central Court of Investigation No. 5, Order of July 28, 1998, Summary Procedure 19/97].Google Scholar
Ausiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Auto de 16 de octubre de 1998 [National High Court. Central Court of Investigation No. 5. Order of October 16th, 1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 3.a, Auto de 4 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 84/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 3, Order of November 4, 1998, Appeal 84/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 1.a, Auto de 5 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 173/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 1, Order of November 5, 1998, Appeal 173/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sentencia de 16 de abril de 2005 [National High Court. Judgement on April 16, 2005].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 25 de febrero de 2003 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 25 2003].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 1 de octubre de 2007 [Supreme Court. Judgement on October 1, 2007].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2012 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 16 2005].Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1931 (Dec. 9, 1931).Google Scholar
Spanish Constitution of 1978 (Dec. 29, 1978).Google Scholar
Real Decreto-Ley 10/1976, de 30 de julio, sobre Amnistía, B.O.E. n° 186, de 4 de agosto de 1976 [Royal Decree-Law 10/1976, Jul. 30, on Amnesty, Official Bulletin of the State number 186, Aug. 4, 1976].Google Scholar
Ley 46/1977, de 15 de octubre, de Amnistía, B.O.E. n° 248, de 17 de octubre de 1977 [Law 46/1977, Oct. 15, of Amnesty, Official Bulletin of the State number 248, Oct 17, 1997].Google Scholar
Real Decreto 19/1977, de 14 de marzo, sobre medidas de gracia, B.O.E. n° 65, de 17 de marzo de 1977, páginas 6201–6202 [Royal Decree 19/1977, Mar. 14, on clemency measures, Official Bulletin of the State number 65, Mar. 17, 1977, at 6201–6202].Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica 6/1985, de 1 de julio, del Poder Judicial [Organic Law 6/1985, of 1 July, on the Judiciary].Google Scholar
Ley Orgánica 10/1995, de 23 de noviembre, del Código Penal [Organic Law 10/1995, of November 23, of the Criminal Code].Google Scholar
Ley 52/2007, de 26 de diciembre, por la que se reconocen y amplían derechos y se establecen medidas en favor de quienes padecieron persecución o violencia durante la guerra civil y la dictadura (“Ley de la Memoria Histórica”) [Law 52/2007, of December 26, whereby the rights of those who suffered persecution or violence during the civil war and the dictatorship are recognized and extended, and measures in their favor are established (“Historical Memory Law “)].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Auto (Sección 2a), de 19 de diciembre de 1995 [Provincial Court of Madrid. Order, Section 2, Dec. 19, 1995].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Sentencia n° 308/96 (19-VII-1996) [Provincial Court of Madrid. Judgment 308/96 (19-VII-1996)].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Providencia de 28 de julio de 1998, Procedimiento Sumario 19/97 [National High Court. Order, Central Court of Investigation No. 5, Order of July 28, 1998, Summary Procedure 19/97].Google Scholar
Ausiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Auto de 16 de octubre de 1998 [National High Court. Central Court of Investigation No. 5. Order of October 16th, 1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 3.a, Auto de 4 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 84/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 3, Order of November 4, 1998, Appeal 84/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 1.a, Auto de 5 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 173/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 1, Order of November 5, 1998, Appeal 173/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sentencia de 16 de abril de 2005 [National High Court. Judgement on April 16, 2005].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 25 de febrero de 2003 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 25 2003].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 1 de octubre de 2007 [Supreme Court. Judgement on October 1, 2007].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2012 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 16 2005].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Auto (Sección 2a), de 19 de diciembre de 1995 [Provincial Court of Madrid. Order, Section 2, Dec. 19, 1995].Google Scholar
Audiencia Provincial de Madrid. Sentencia n° 308/96 (19-VII-1996) [Provincial Court of Madrid. Judgment 308/96 (19-VII-1996)].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Providencia de 28 de julio de 1998, Procedimiento Sumario 19/97 [National High Court. Order, Central Court of Investigation No. 5, Order of July 28, 1998, Summary Procedure 19/97].Google Scholar
Ausiencia Nacional. Juzgado Central de Instrucción No. 5. Auto de 16 de octubre de 1998 [National High Court. Central Court of Investigation No. 5. Order of October 16th, 1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 3.a, Auto de 4 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 84/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 3, Order of November 4, 1998, Appeal 84/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sala de lo Penal, Sección 1.a, Auto de 5 de noviembre de 1998, Recurso de Apelación núm. 173/1998 [National High Court. Criminal Division, Section 1, Order of November 5, 1998, Appeal 173/1998].Google Scholar
Audiencia Nacional. Sentencia de 16 de abril de 2005 [National High Court. Judgement on April 16, 2005].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 25 de febrero de 2003 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 25 2003].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 1 de octubre de 2007 [Supreme Court. Judgement on October 1, 2007].Google Scholar
Tribunal Supremo. Sentencia de 27 de febrero de 2012 [Supreme Court. Judgement on February 16 2005].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.049, de 9 de febrero de 1084 [Law No. 23.049 (February 9, 1984)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.492, de Punto Final, de 23 de diciembre de 1986 [Law No. 23.492: Full Stop law (December 23, 1986)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.521, de Obediencia Debida, de 4 de junio de 1987 [Law No. 23.521: Law of Due Obedience (June 4, 1987)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 25.779, de 21 de agosto de 2003 [Law No. 25.779 (August 21, 2003)].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 2 de noviembre de 1995 [Supreme Court. Judgement of November 2, 1995].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 14 de junio de 2005 [Supreme Court. Judgement of June 14, 2005].Google Scholar
Juzgado Nacional en lo Criminal y Correccional Federal 4. Auto de 6 de marzo de 2001. Juez Gabriel Cavallo. Causa Nro. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio s/sustracción de menores de 10 años” del registro de la Secretaría 7 [Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 4. Order of Mar. 6, 2001. Judge Gabriel Cavallo. Case No. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio on abduction of children under 10” Register of the Secretariat 7].Google Scholar
Decreto-Ley N°. 2191, de Amnistía, de 18 de abril de 1978. Diario Oficial No. 30.042 [Decree-Law No. 2191, of Amnesty (April 18, 1978). Official Journal No. 30,042].Google Scholar
Loi No. 64–1326 du 26 décembre 1964 tendant à constater l'imprescriptibilité des crimes contre l'humanité (1). Version consolidée au 29 décembre 1964 [Act No. 64–1326 of 26 December 1964, determining the non-applicability of statutory limitations to crimes against humanity (1). Consolidated version of 29 December 1964].Google Scholar
Cour de Cassation. Arrět du 20 décembre 1985 [Supreme Court. Judgement of December 20, 1985].Google Scholar
Cour d'Appel de Lyon. Arrět du 4 octobre 1985 [Court of Appeal of Lyon. Judgement of October 4, 1985].Google Scholar
Tribunale Militare di Roma. Sentenza, 22 iuglio 1997 [Military Tribunal of Rome. Judgement of July 22, 1997].Google Scholar
Corte Militare di Appello di Roma. Sentenza, 7 marzo 1998 [Military Court of Appeals. Judgement of March 7, 1998].Google Scholar
Corte di Cassazione. Sentenza, 16 novembre 1998 [Court of Cassation. Judgement of November 16, 1998].Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995, http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1995-034.pdf (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Explanatory Memorandum To The Parliamentary Bill, http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/legal/bill.htm (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Azanian Peoples Organisation (Azapo) And Others v. The President Of The Republic Of South Africa. CCT 17/96. Constitutional Court. 25 July 1996.Google Scholar
High Court of Justice. Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court. In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjicendum. Re: Augusto Pinochet Duarte. October 28th, 1998.Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 3 W.L.R. 1456 (H.L. 1998).Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 2 W.L.R. 272 (H.L. 1999).Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 2 W.L.R. 827 (H.L. 1999).Google Scholar
Bow Street Magistrates’ Court. The Kingdom of Spain v. Augusto Pinochet Ugarte. October 8th, 1999.Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.049, de 9 de febrero de 1084 [Law No. 23.049 (February 9, 1984)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.492, de Punto Final, de 23 de diciembre de 1986 [Law No. 23.492: Full Stop law (December 23, 1986)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.521, de Obediencia Debida, de 4 de junio de 1987 [Law No. 23.521: Law of Due Obedience (June 4, 1987)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 25.779, de 21 de agosto de 2003 [Law No. 25.779 (August 21, 2003)].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 2 de noviembre de 1995 [Supreme Court. Judgement of November 2, 1995].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 14 de junio de 2005 [Supreme Court. Judgement of June 14, 2005].Google Scholar
Juzgado Nacional en lo Criminal y Correccional Federal 4. Auto de 6 de marzo de 2001. Juez Gabriel Cavallo. Causa Nro. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio s/sustracción de menores de 10 años” del registro de la Secretaría 7 [Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 4. Order of Mar. 6, 2001. Judge Gabriel Cavallo. Case No. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio on abduction of children under 10” Register of the Secretariat 7].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.049, de 9 de febrero de 1084 [Law No. 23.049 (February 9, 1984)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.492, de Punto Final, de 23 de diciembre de 1986 [Law No. 23.492: Full Stop law (December 23, 1986)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 23.521, de Obediencia Debida, de 4 de junio de 1987 [Law No. 23.521: Law of Due Obedience (June 4, 1987)].Google Scholar
Ley N°. 25.779, de 21 de agosto de 2003 [Law No. 25.779 (August 21, 2003)].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 2 de noviembre de 1995 [Supreme Court. Judgement of November 2, 1995].Google Scholar
Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación. Sentencia de 14 de junio de 2005 [Supreme Court. Judgement of June 14, 2005].Google Scholar
Juzgado Nacional en lo Criminal y Correccional Federal 4. Auto de 6 de marzo de 2001. Juez Gabriel Cavallo. Causa Nro. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio s/sustracción de menores de 10 años” del registro de la Secretaría 7 [Federal Criminal and Correctional Court No. 4. Order of Mar. 6, 2001. Judge Gabriel Cavallo. Case No. 8686/2000 “Simon, Julio, Del Cerro, Juan Antonio on abduction of children under 10” Register of the Secretariat 7].Google Scholar
Decreto-Ley N°. 2191, de Amnistía, de 18 de abril de 1978. Diario Oficial No. 30.042 [Decree-Law No. 2191, of Amnesty (April 18, 1978). Official Journal No. 30,042].Google Scholar
Loi No. 64–1326 du 26 décembre 1964 tendant à constater l'imprescriptibilité des crimes contre l'humanité (1). Version consolidée au 29 décembre 1964 [Act No. 64–1326 of 26 December 1964, determining the non-applicability of statutory limitations to crimes against humanity (1). Consolidated version of 29 December 1964].Google Scholar
Cour de Cassation. Arrět du 20 décembre 1985 [Supreme Court. Judgement of December 20, 1985].Google Scholar
Cour d'Appel de Lyon. Arrět du 4 octobre 1985 [Court of Appeal of Lyon. Judgement of October 4, 1985].Google Scholar
Loi No. 64–1326 du 26 décembre 1964 tendant à constater l'imprescriptibilité des crimes contre l'humanité (1). Version consolidée au 29 décembre 1964 [Act No. 64–1326 of 26 December 1964, determining the non-applicability of statutory limitations to crimes against humanity (1). Consolidated version of 29 December 1964].Google Scholar
Cour de Cassation. Arrět du 20 décembre 1985 [Supreme Court. Judgement of December 20, 1985].Google Scholar
Cour d'Appel de Lyon. Arrět du 4 octobre 1985 [Court of Appeal of Lyon. Judgement of October 4, 1985].Google Scholar
Tribunale Militare di Roma. Sentenza, 22 iuglio 1997 [Military Tribunal of Rome. Judgement of July 22, 1997].Google Scholar
Corte Militare di Appello di Roma. Sentenza, 7 marzo 1998 [Military Court of Appeals. Judgement of March 7, 1998].Google Scholar
Corte di Cassazione. Sentenza, 16 novembre 1998 [Court of Cassation. Judgement of November 16, 1998].Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995, http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1995-034.pdf (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Explanatory Memorandum To The Parliamentary Bill, http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/legal/bill.htm (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Azanian Peoples Organisation (Azapo) And Others v. The President Of The Republic Of South Africa. CCT 17/96. Constitutional Court. 25 July 1996.Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Promotion of National Unity and Reconciliation Act 34 of 1995, http://www.justice.gov.za/legislation/acts/1995-034.pdf (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
The Department of Justice and Constitutional development, Explanatory Memorandum To The Parliamentary Bill, http://www.justice.gov.za/trc/legal/bill.htm (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
Azanian Peoples Organisation (Azapo) And Others v. The President Of The Republic Of South Africa. CCT 17/96. Constitutional Court. 25 July 1996.Google Scholar
High Court of Justice. Queen's Bench Division, Divisional Court. In the Matter of an Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus ad Subjicendum. Re: Augusto Pinochet Duarte. October 28th, 1998.Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 3 W.L.R. 1456 (H.L. 1998).Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 2 W.L.R. 272 (H.L. 1999).Google Scholar
House of Lords. R v Bow Street Metropolitan Stipendiary Magistrate, ex parte Pinochet Ugarte, 2 W.L.R. 827 (H.L. 1999).Google Scholar
Bow Street Magistrates’ Court. The Kingdom of Spain v. Augusto Pinochet Ugarte. October 8th, 1999.Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Dražen Erdemović, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, IT-96-22, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Li (Appeals Chamber, 7 October 1997).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, International Criminal Court for the former Yugoslavia, IT-94-1, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction (Appeals Chamber, 2 October 1995).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Morris Kallon and Birma Buzzy Kamara, Special Court for Sierra Leone, SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E) and SCSL-2004-16-AR72(E), Decision on the challenge to Jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty (Appeals Chamber, 13 March 2004).Google Scholar
Case of Velasquez-Rodriguez. Velasquez-Rodriguez v. Honduras, Inter-Am. Ct. H. R. (Ser. C) (1988).Google Scholar
Case of Almonacid Arellano and others. Almonacid Arellano and others v. Chile, Inter-Am. Ct. H. R. (2006).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Dražen Erdemović, International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia, IT-96-22, Separate and Dissenting Opinion of Judge Li (Appeals Chamber, 7 October 1997).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Dusko Tadic, International Criminal Court for the former Yugoslavia, IT-94-1, Decision on the Defence Motion for Interlocutory Appeal on Jurisdiction (Appeals Chamber, 2 October 1995).Google Scholar
The Prosecutor v. Morris Kallon and Birma Buzzy Kamara, Special Court for Sierra Leone, SCSL-2004-15-AR72(E) and SCSL-2004-16-AR72(E), Decision on the challenge to Jurisdiction: Lomé Accord Amnesty (Appeals Chamber, 13 March 2004).Google Scholar
Case of Velasquez-Rodriguez. Velasquez-Rodriguez v. Honduras, Inter-Am. Ct. H. R. (Ser. C) (1988).Google Scholar
Case of Almonacid Arellano and others. Almonacid Arellano and others v. Chile, Inter-Am. Ct. H. R. (2006).Google Scholar
BBC NEWS. 'Chile Caravan of Death: Eight guilty of murder'. December 23, 2013. http://www.bbc.com/news/world-latin-america-25499373 (last visited August 26, 2015).Google Scholar
BBC NEWS. 'Pinochet “unfit to face trial”'. January 12, 2000. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/599526.stm (last visited August 26, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Archivo. 'Absueltos por falta de pruebas los policías acusados de la muerte de Ruano', by Yoldi, José. July 25, 1996. http://elpais.com/diario/1996/07/25/espana/838245619_850215.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Archivo. 'El Supremo eleva a 1.084 años la pena de Scilingo por crímenes contra la humanidad', by Yoldi, José. July 5, 2007. http://elpais.com/diario/2007/07/05/espana/1183586418_850215.html (last visited August 28, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Archivo. 'Reabierto el ‘caso Ruano’ 25 años después', by de la Cuadra, Bonifacio. January 28, 1994. http://elpais.com/diario/1994/01/28/espana/759711607_850215.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. España. 'Adolfo Scilingo, el recluso modelo que no se arrepiente de sus crímenes', by Manuel Altozano. March 28, 2015. http://politica.elpais.com/politica/2015/03/28/actualidad/1427535034_826071.html (last visited August 28, 2015).Google Scholar
El País. Reportaje: Memoria Histórica. “No se tiró, lo mataron”, by Junquera, Natalia. January 17, 2009. http://elpais.com/diario/2009/01/18/domingo/1232254357_850215.html (last visited August 18, 2015).Google Scholar
'Statement on the release of General Pinochet'. Home Secretary Jack Straw. BBC News. March 2nd 2000.Google Scholar
The Washington Post. 'A Chilean Dictator's Dark Legacy', by Reel, Monte and Smith, J.Y. December 11, 2006. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/12/10/AR2006121000302.html (last visited August 26, 2015).Google Scholar