1 Arif Dirlik, Postmodernity's Histories: The Past as Legacy and Project (Rowman & Littlefield Publishers Inc., 2000) 63–89; RP Anand, Studies in International Law and History: An Asian Perspective (Brill Academic Publishers, Massachussetts USA 2004) 24–102; David Fidler, ‘The Asian Century: Implications for International Law', (2005) 9 SYBIL 19–35; Nicholas Onuf, “Tainted by Contingency': Retelling the Story of International Law” in Richard Falk, Lester Edwin J. Ruiz, and RBJ Walker (eds), Reframing the International: Law, Culture, Politics (Routledge, New York, 2002). See also Barry Buzan and Richard Little, “The Idea of ‘International System': Theory Meets History”, (1994) International Political Science Review, Vol. 15, No. 3, 231–255.Google Scholar

2 SK Agrawala (tr), TS Rama Rao and JN Saxena, New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (N.M. Tripathia Private Limited, 1983); Sienho Yee, ‘The Role of Law in the Formation of Regional Perspectives in Human Rights and Regional Systems for the Protection of Human Rights: The European and Asian Models as Illustrations’ (2004) 8 SYBIL 157–164.Google Scholar

3 CH Alexandrowicz, An Introduction to the History of the Law of Nations in the East Indies (16^th, 17^th, and 18^th Centuries), (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1967).Google Scholar

4 CH Alexandrowicz, The Afro-Asian States and International Law, Recueil de Cours, Vol. 123 (1968), 124.Google Scholar

5 RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India, (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, Germany 2005) 1–5, 29–30, 39–40, 54–55, 108–109, 121–130.Google Scholar

6 Id. at note 5, at 125.Google Scholar

7 Id. at note 5, at 126. See Martti Koskenniemi, The Gentle Civilizer of Nations: The Rise and Fall of International Law 1870–1960 (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2002).Google Scholar

8 For the seminal work on colonialism's operative effects on positivist conceptions of international law, see Antony Anghie, ‘Finding the Peripheries: Sovereignty and Colonialism in Nineteenth-Century International Law’ (1999) 40 Harv. Int'l L.J. 1–80; Antony Anghie, Imperialism, Sovereignty, and the Making of International Law (Cambridge University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

9 M. Sornarajah, ‘The Asian Perspective to International Law in the Age of Globalization', (2001) 5 SJICL 284–313; Nicholas Tarling, Nations and States in Southeast Asia (Cambridge University Press, 1998), 45–111.Google Scholar

10 ASEAN Law Association, ASEAN Legal Systems (Butterworths Asia, 1995); Carmelo V. Sison and Roshan T. Jose (trs), Constitutional and Legal Systems of the ASEAN Countries (University of the Philippines, 1990).Google Scholar

11 Kevin YL Tan, ‘The Making and Remaking of Constitutions in Southeast Asia: An Overview', (2002) 6 SJICL 1–41.Google Scholar

12 Andrew Harding, “Comparative Law and Legal Transplantation in South East Asia: Making Sense of the ‘Nomic Din” in David Nelken and Johannes Feest (eds), Adapting Legal Cultures (Hart Publishing, Oxford-Portland Oregon, 2001).Google Scholar

13 See Allah Bukhsh Karim Bukhsh Brohi (ed), Five Lectures on Asia and the United Nations (Recueil de Cours, Volume 102, 1968).Google Scholar

14 T.O. Elias, New Horizons in International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1992) 29–43.Google Scholar

15 Case Concerning Sovereignty over Pedra Blanca/Pulau Batu Puteh, Middle Rocks, and South Ledge (Malaysia v. Singapore) [2008] ICJ Rep 130; See Case Concerning Sovereignty over Pulau Ligitan and Pulau Sipadan (Indonesia v. Malaysia) [2002] ICJ Rep; Case Concerning the Temple of Preah Vihear (Cambodia v. Thailand) [1962] ICJ Rep 6. See also Hisashi Owada, ‘The Experience of Asia with International Adjudication’ (2005) 9 SYBIL 9–18.Google Scholar

16 See Jose E. Alvarez, ‘Institutionalized Legalisation and the Asia-Pacific ‘Region', (2007) 5 N.Z.J. Pub. & Int'l L. 9. ¹⁷ See Richard A. Falk, “Is the International Legal Order Eurocentric?” in The New States and the International Legal Order, Recueil de Cours, Vol. 118 (1966), 34–43.Google Scholar

18 See Martti Koskenniemi, “The Politics of International Law” in Gerry Simpson (ed), The Nature of International Law (Dartmouth Publishing Company, England, 2001).Google Scholar

19 RP Anand, “Jawaharlal Nehru and International Law and Relations” in Studies in International Law and History: An Asian Perspective (Brill Academic Publishers, Massachusetts USA, 2004); Final Communique of the Asian-African Conference, Bandung, 24 April 1955, available at http://www.issafrica.org/AF/RegOrg/unity_to_union/pdfs/asiaafrica/bandung55.pdf (last visited 20 October 2008).Google Scholar

20 Richard A. Falk, The New States and the International Legal Order, Recueil de Cours, Volume 118 (1966), 10–25.Google Scholar

21 See George McTurnan Kahin, The Asian-African Conference, Bandung, Indonesia, 1955 (Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 1970).Google Scholar

22 Sisir K. Gupta, ‘Asian Nonalignment’ (November 1965) 362 Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 44–51; Rajen Harshe, ‘India's Non-Alignment: An Attempt at Conceptual Reconstruction’ (February 17–24, 1990) 25 Economic and Political Weekly, 399–405.Google Scholar

23 Andrew F. Sunter, ‘TWAIL as Naturalized Epistemological Inquiry’ (2007) 20 Can. J. L. & Juris. 475, at 487–488; see David P. Fidler, ‘Revolt Against or From Within the West? TWAIL, the Developing World, and the Future Direction of International Law’ (2003) 2 Chinese J. Int'l L. 29.Google Scholar

24 B.S. Chimni, “Third World Approaches to International Law: A Manifesto”, in Antony Anghie, Bhupinder Chimni, Karin Mickelson, and Obiora Okafor (eds), The Third World and International Order: Law, Politics and Globalization (Brill Academic Publishers, Leiden, the Netherlands, 2003); Makau Mutua, ‘What is TWAIL?’ (2000) 94 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 31–40.Google Scholar

25 As a theoretical platform for international legal scholarship, however, TWAIL has not yet gone beyond the level of pure critique. It has not provided concrete alternatives or viable ‘solutions’ to problems of the modern international system. See B.S. Chimni, International Law and World Order: A Critique of Contemporary Approaches (Sage Publications, Newbury Park, California, 1993).Google Scholar

26 Outi Korhonen, ‘The Role of History in International Law’ (2000) 94 Am. Soc'y Int'l L. Proc. 45–46.Google Scholar

27 Nagendra Singh, “India and International Law” in RP Anand (ed), Asian States and the Development of Universal International Law (Vikas Publications, Delhi, India, 1972).Google Scholar

28 V.S. Mani, ‘An Indian Perspective on the Evolution of International Law on the Threshold of the Third Millenium’ (2000) 9 Asian Y.B. Int'l L. 31–77.Google Scholar

29 RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Germany 2005), 28–30.Google Scholar

30 Id. at note 19.Google Scholar

31 Id.; see Onuma Yasuaki, ‘When Was the Law of International Society Born? An Inquiry of the History of International Law from an Intercivilizational Perspective’ (2000) 2 J. Hist. Int'l L. 1.Google Scholar

32 Id. at note 16.Google Scholar

33 Id. at note 19, at 34.Google Scholar

34 Id. at note 2; see Ingrid Detter, ‘The Problem of Unequal Treaties’ (1966) 15 Int'l & Comp. L. Q. 1069–1089.Google Scholar

35 Id. at note 19, at 38–41.Google Scholar

36 Id. at note 16, at 36–37. Id. at note 17.Google Scholar

37 Id. at note 19. RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Germany, 2005), 35–40.Google Scholar

38 RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Germany, 2005), 39.Google Scholar

39 Right of Passage over Indian Territory (Portugal v. India) (Merits) [1960] ICJ Rep 6.Google Scholar

40 Edward Keene, Beyond the Anarchical Society: Grotius, Colonialism and Order in World Politics (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2002), 76–96.Google Scholar

41 RP Anand, “Equality of States in an Unequal World: A Historical Perspective”, in Sovereign Equality of States, Recueil de Cours, Vol. 197 (1986), 52–100.Google Scholar

42 Christos Theodoropoulos, Colonialism and General International Law: The Contemporary Theory of National Sovereignty and Self-determination (New Horizon Publishing House, Benin, Nigeria, 1988), 23. See also Lauren Benton, Law and Colonial Cultures (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2002), 1–30.Google Scholar

43 Id. at note 19. Id. at note 20, pp. 65–69. See Island of Palmas case (Netherlands v. USA), 4 April 1928, II RIAA 829–871, at 839. Full text available at http://untreaty.un.org/cod/riaa/cases/vol_II/829-871.pdf (last visited 20 October 2008).Google Scholar

44 RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Germany, 2005), 54–55.Google Scholar

45 Peter Fitzpatrick, ‘Terminal Legality: Imperialism and the (de)composition of Law” in Diane Kirkby and Catharine Coleborne, Law, History, Colonialism: The Reach of Empire (Manchester University Press, United Kingdom, 2001).Google Scholar

46 Id. at note 18, at 56.Google Scholar

47 Pemmaraju Sreenivasa Rao, “The Indian Position on Some General Principles of International Law”, in Bimal N. Patel (ed), India and International Law (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, the Netherlands, 2005).Google Scholar

48 RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India(Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Germany, 2005), 78–84.Google Scholar

49 M.S. Nawaz, The Changing Law of Nations: An Indian Focus (Eastern Law House, Calcutta, India, 2000), 7–9. See also S.K. Agarwala, India's Contribution to the Development of International Law — the Role of Indian Courts, in RP Anand (ed), Asian States and the Development of International Law (Vikas Publications, Delhi, India, 1972).Google Scholar

50 Id. at note 9. See Iza Hussin, ‘The Pursuit of Perak Regalia: Islam, Law, and the Politics of Authority in the Colonial State’ (2007) 32 Law & Soc. Inquiry 759–784; Sally Engle Merry, ‘Law and Colonialism’ (1991) 25 Law & Soc'y Rev. 889–920.Google Scholar

51 See H.S. Bhatia, Origin and Development of Legal and Political System in India (Deep & Deep Publications, New Delhi, India, 1976); Hamid Khan, Constitutional and Political History of Pakistan (Oxford University Press, United Kingdom, 2001).Google Scholar

52 See Francis Robinson, Islam, South Asia and the West (Oxford University Press, United States, 2008); Sugata Bose and Ayesha Jalal, Modern South Asia: History, Culture, and Political Economy (2^nd ed., Routledge, United Kingdom, 2004).Google Scholar

53 See Francis Robinson (ed), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Nepal, Bhutan, and the Maldives (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 1989).Google Scholar

54 Richard Sisson and Leo E. Rose, War and Secession: Pakistan, India, and the Creation of Bangladesh (University of California Press, California, United States, 1990).Google Scholar

55 UNSC Res 47 (21 April 1948) UN Doc/S/RES/726.Google Scholar

56 See Mridu Rai, Hindu Rulers, Muslim Subjects: Islam, Rights, and the History of Kashmir (Princeton University Press, New Jersey, United States 2004); H.S. Gururaja Rao, Legal Aspects of the Kashmir Problem (Minerva Press, New Delhi, India 2002); Victoria Schofield, Kashmir in Conflict: India, Pakistan and the Unending War (I.B. Tauris, London, 2003).Google Scholar

57 Id. at note 46, at 35.Google Scholar

58 Id. at note 46, at 36. Upon Pakistan's request, the Court discontinued proceedings after Pakistan and India reached a negotiated settlement. Trial of Pakistani Prisoners of War (Pakistan v. India) Order of 15 December 1973, [1973] ICJ Rep 347.Google Scholar

59 Id. at note 46 at 36–37. Aerial Incident of 10 August 1999 (Pakistan v. India) (Jurisdiction) [2000] ICJ Rep 12.Google Scholar

60 For a concise issue summary on India's succession to treaties concluded by British India, see M.K. Nawaz, The Changing Law of Nations: An Indian Focus (Eastern Law House Ltd., Calcutta, India, 2000), 12–18.Google Scholar

61 UNGA Res 1514 (XV) (14 December 1960). Full text available at http://www.unhchr.ch/html/menu3/b/c_coloni.htm (last visited 20 October 2008). See also Zoltán Szilágyi, The United Nations’ Role in the Liquidation of Colonialism (Institute for World Economy of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary, 1986), 27–85.Google Scholar

62 RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden Germany, 2005), 103–104.Google Scholar

63 Id. at note 46, at 38–39.Google Scholar

64 The five principles are: 1) mutual respect for territorial integrity and sovereignty; 2) mutual non-aggression; 3) mutual non-interference in internal affairs; 3) equality and mutual benefit; and 5) peaceful coexistence. RP Anand, Development of Modern International Law and India (Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft, Baden-Baden, Germany, 2005), 101–114.Google Scholar

65 Id. at note 18. See Treaty of Amity and Cooperation in Southeast Asia, Indonesia, 24 February 1976 (full text available at http://www.aseansec.org/1217.htm, last visited 20 October 2008) [hereafter, TAC]; Charter of the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation, Bangladesh, 8 December 1985 (full text available at http://www.saarc-sec.org/data/docs/charter.pdf, last visited 20 October 2008) [hereafter, SAARC Charter].Google Scholar

66 Jagdish Bhagwati (ed), The New International Economic Order: The North-South Debate (MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachussetts, United States, 1977); T.S. Rama Rao, “The New International Economic Order and the North-South Dialogue” in S.K. Agrawala, T.S. Rama Rao, and J.N. Saxena (trs), New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (International Law Association, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., India, 1983); R.C. Hingorani, “New International Economic Order”, in S.K. Agrawala, T.S. Rama Rao, and J.N. Saxena (trs), New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (International Law Association, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., India, 1983).Google Scholar

67 UNGA Res 3201(S-VI) (1974) UN Doc A/RES/S-6/3201.Google Scholar

68 UNGA Res 3202 (S-VI) (1974) UN Doc A/RES/S-6/3202; UNGA Res 3281 (XXIX) (1974), UN GAOR 29^th Session Supp 31, 50.Google Scholar

69 Article III, SAARC Charter.Google Scholar

70 Article IV, SAARC Charter.Google Scholar

71 Article V(1), SAARC Charter.Google Scholar

72 Articles V and VI, SAARC Charter.Google Scholar

73 Nihal Rodrigo, “SAARC as an institutional framework for cooperation in South Asia”, in Ramesh Thakur and Oddny Wiggen (trs), South Asia in the World: Problem Solving Perspectives on Security, Sustainable Development and Good Governance (United Nations University Press, New York, United States, 2004).Google Scholar

74 Preamble, last clause, SAARC Social Charter. Full text available at http://www.saarc-sec.org/main.php?id=13 (last visited 20 October 2008).Google Scholar

75 Article III(1), SAARC Social Charter.Google Scholar

76 Article III(4), SAARC Social Charter.Google Scholar

77 Article IV(1) and IV(4), SAARC Social Charter.Google Scholar

78 Article VI, SAARC Social Charter.Google Scholar

79 Article VII, SAARC Social Charter.Google Scholar

80 Articles VIII and IX, SAARC Social Charter.Google Scholar

81 Article X, SAARC Social Charter.Google Scholar

82 See Dr. O.P. Goel (ed), India and SAARC Engagements (Volumes 1–2) (Isha Books, Delhi, India, 2004).Google Scholar

83 Preamble, first clause, SAARC Charter.Google Scholar

84 Articles X(1) and X(2), SAARC Charter.Google Scholar

85 Id. at note 69.Google Scholar

86 Niaz A. Naik, “A Security Organization for South Asia: Mechanism for Conflict Resolution in South Asia”, in Ramesh Thakur and Oddny Wiggen (trs), South Asia in the World: Problem Solving Perspectives on Security, Sustainable Development and Good Governance (United Nations University Press, New York, United States, 2004). See also D. Suba Chandran and P.R. Chari (trs), Armed Conflicts in South Asia 2008: Growing Violence (Routledge, India, April 2008); Armed Conflict Database, International Institute for Strategic Studies, available at http://www.iiss.org/ (last visited 25 October 2008); Kingsley de Silva, “Terrorism and Political Agitation in Post-colonial South Asia: Jammu-Kashmir and Sri Lanka”, in Ramesh Thakur and Oddny Wiggen (trs), South Asia in the World: Problem Solving Perspectives on Security, Sustainable Development and Good Governance (United Nations University Press, New York, United States, 2004).Google Scholar

87 Lok Raj Baral, “National Security: Inter-State Conflict in South Asia (a Nepali Perspective)”, in Ramesh Thakur and Oddny Wiggen (trs), South Asia in the World: Problem Solving Perspectives on Security, Sustainable Development and Good Governance (United Nations University Press, New York, United States, 2004).Google Scholar

88 See Stephen P. Cohen, “Nuclear weapons and nuclear war in South Asia: Unknowable futures”, and Christophe Carle, “International security in a nuclear South Asia”, both in Ramesh Thakur and Oddny Wiggen (trs), South Asia in the World: Problem Solving Perspectives on Security, Sustainable Development and Good Governance (United Nations University Press, New York, United States, 2004).Google Scholar

89 Satish Nambiar, “South Asian Contributions to United Nations Peacekeeping Operations, with particular reference to India's participation”, and Syed Fatemy Ahmed Roomy, “The United Nations and South Asia: Bangladesh's contribution to UN Peacekeeping”, both in Ramesh Thakur and Oddny Wiggen (trs), South Asia in the World: Problem Solving Perspectives on Security, Sustainable Development and Good Governance (United Nations University Press, New York, United States, 2004).Google Scholar

90 RP Anand, “South Asia and the Law of the Sea: Problems and Prospects”, in RP Anand, Studies in International Law and History: An Asian Perspective (Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, the Netherlands, 2004).Google Scholar

91 Id. at note 90. See B.R. Chauhan, “Fixation and Delimitation of Maritime Frontiers” in S.K. Agrawala, T.S. Rama Rao, and J.N. Saxena (trs), New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (International Law Association, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., India, 1983).Google Scholar

92 Article 7(2): “Where because of the presence of a delta and other natural conditions the coastline is highly unstable, the appropriate points may be selected along the furthest seaward extent of the low-water line and, notwithstanding subsequent regression of the low-water line, the straight baselines shall remain effective until changed by the coastal State in accordance with this Convention.”Google Scholar

93 Id. at note 90. See D.W. Wadegaonkar, “Changing Concept of the Determination of Maritime Frontiers and the Delimitation of Maritime Boundaries”, in S.K. Agrawala, T.S. Rama Rao, and J.N. Saxena (trs), New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (International Law Association, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., India, 1983).Google Scholar

94 Id. at note 90.Google Scholar

95 UNCLOS (1982), Agreement Relating to the Implementation of Part XI of the Convention, Article 69 (Right of Landlocked States). Full text available at http://www.un.org/Depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm (last visited 10 October 2008). See V.C. Govindaraj, “Land-Locked States and the Law of the Sea” in S.K. Agrawala, T.S. Rama Rao, and J.N. Saxena (trs), New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (International Law Association, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., India, 1983).Google Scholar

96 See Shyami Fernando Puvimanasinghe, Foreign Investment, Human Rights, and the Enviroment: A Perspective from South Asia on the Role of Public International Law for Development (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, Boston, 2007); Lakshman Guruswamy, “Environment and Trade: Competing Paradigms in International Law”, in Antony Anghie and Garry Sturgess (trs), Legal Visions of the 21^st Century: Essays in Honour of Judge Christopher Weeramantry (Kluwer Law International, the Hague, Boston, 1998).Google Scholar

97 See A. David Ambrose, “International Environmental Law and India”, in Bimal N. Patel (ed), India and International Law (Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, the Netherlands, 2005).Google Scholar

98 Id. at note 97. See Alexander J. Bolla and Ted L. McDorman (trs), Comparative Asian Environmental Law Anthology (Carolina Academic Press, Durham, North Carolina, United States, 1999); Mochtar Kusuma-Atmadja, Thomas A. Mensah, and Bernard H. Oxman (trs), Sustainable Development and the Preservation of the Oceans: The Challenges of UNCLOS and Agenda 21 (Law of the Sea Institute, William S. Richardson School of Law, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, 1997).Google Scholar

99 See http://www.sacep.org/html/about_overview.htm (last visited 20 October 2008).Google Scholar

100 C. Jayaraj, ‘The Law of Outer Space and India” in Bimal N. Patel (ed), India and International Law (Brill Academic Publishers, Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, the Netherlands, 2005); J.N. Singh, Outer Space, Outer Sea, Outer Land and International Law (Harnam, New Delhi, 1987); P.P.C. Haanappel, The Law and Policy of Air Space and Outer Space: A Comparative Approach (Kluwer Law International, the Hague, New York, 2003).Google Scholar

101 Upendra Baxi, “Teaching of International Law in India in 2000 A.D. – Some Non-Utopian Proposals”, in K. Agrawala, T.S. Rama Rao, and J.N. Saxena (trs), New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (International Law Association, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., India, 1983). See also M.K. Nawaz, “On the Ways and Means of Improving Research of International Law in India”, in “, in K. Agrawala, T.S. Rama Rao, and J.N. Saxena (trs), New Horizons of International Law and Developing Countries (International Law Association, N.M. Tripathi Private Ltd., India, 1983).Google Scholar

102 Kl Vibhute, ‘International Law in India – Developing Curricula and Teaching: Some Reflections’ (2001) 5 Sing. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 388–404.Google Scholar

103 BS Chimni, ‘Teaching, Research, and Promotion of International Law in India: Past, Present, and Future’ (2001) 5 Sing. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 368–387.Google Scholar

104 See Amry Vandenbosch, ‘Regionalism in Southeast Asia’ (1946) The Far Eastern Quarterly, Volume 5, No. 4, 427–438.Google Scholar

105 M.B. Hooker, A Concise Legal History of Southeast Asia (Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York, 1978); see also Nicholas Tarling (ed), The Cambridge History of Southeast Asia: From early times to c. 1500 (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 1999).Google Scholar

106 Barbara Watson Andaya, “Historicising ‘Modernity’ in Southeast Asia” (1997) Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Volume 40, No. 4, 391–409.Google Scholar

107 See Victor Lieberman, ‘Local Integration and Eurasian Analogies: Structuring Southeast Asian History, c. 1350 – c. 1830', (1993) Modern Asian Studies, Volume 27, No. 3, 475–572.Google Scholar

108 Id. at note 105. See also Craig J. Reynolds, ‘A New Look at Old Southeast Asia’ (1995) The Journal of Asian Studies, Volume 54, No. 2, 419–446.Google Scholar

109 MB. Hooker, Laws of Southeast Asia: Volumes 1 and 2 (Butterworth Legal Publishers, Singapore, 1986–1988).Google Scholar

110 Graham Hassall and Cheryl Saunders, Asia-Pacific Constitutional Systems (Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom, 2002) 14–17.Google Scholar

111 See Tony Day and Craig J. Reynolds, ‘Cosmologies, Truth Regimes, and the State in Southeast Asia’ (2000) Modern Asian Studies, Volume 34, No. 1, 1–55.Google Scholar

112 M.B. Hooker, A Concise Legal History of Southeast Asia (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1978), 1–14, at 9: “The Southeast Asian legal world is thus a world of conflict of laws. This was not always so: in the pre-European period there was a coexistence of legal ideas which occasionally resulted in a blend of principle; conflict was not invetiable. Even in the case of formally exclusive systems, such as Islamic law, accommodations did take place.” See Richard A. Gard, ‘Ideological Problems in Southeast Asia’ (1953) Philosophy East and West, Volume 2, No. 4, 292–307.Google Scholar

113 T.N. Harper, ‘Asian Values and Southeast Asian Histories’ (1997) The Historical Journal, Volume 40, No. 2, 507–517. See also G. Carter Bentley, ‘Indigenous States of Southeast Asia’ (1986) Annual Review of Anthropology, Volume 15, 275–305.Google Scholar

114 Id. at note 106, at 19–21. Portuguese colonial enclaves were in Goa, Diu, Daman, Calicut, Colombo, Malacca, Macau, Java, the Moluccas, and Timor, with a lease relationship with China covering Macau; British colonies in Penang, Singapore, the Malay states, British Borneo and Burma, with a lease relationship with China covering Hong Kong; French holdings were Laos and Vietnam as regions of Indochina; and Spain held the Philippines until their cession of the territory to the United States in 1898.Google Scholar

115 Id. at note 106, at 27.Google Scholar

116 See Paul Kelemen, ‘Southeast Asia Between the Superpowers’ (1981) Economic and Political Weekly, Volume 16, No. 37, 1503–1508;Google Scholar

117 Sompong Sucharitkul, ‘ASEAN Society, A Dynamic Experiment for Southeast Asian Regional Cooperation’ (1991) 1 Asian Y.B. Int'l L. 113–148, at 121. See Nicholas Tarling, Regionalism in Southeast Asia: To Foster the Political Will (Routledge, United Kingdom, 2006).Google Scholar

118 See David Brown, ‘From Peripheral Communities to Ethnic Nations: Separatism in Southeast Asia’ (1988) Pacific Affairs, Volume 61, No. 1, 51–77; Vincent K. Pollard, ‘ASA and ASEAN, 1961–1967: Southeast Asian Regionalism’ (1970) Asian Survey, Volume 10, No.3, 244–255.Google Scholar

119 Norman D. Palmer, The New Regionalism in Asia and the Pacific (Lexington Books, Canada, United States, 1991), 59–74.Google Scholar

120 See Treaty of Amity and Cooperatiom in Southeast Asia [hereafter, TAC], Indonesia, 24 February 1976 (full text at http://www.aseansec.org/1217.htm last visited 20 August 2008); ASEAN Declaration, Bangkok, Thailand, 8 August 1967 (full text at http://www.aseansec.org/1212/htm last visited 20 August 2008).Google Scholar

121 TAC, Articles 1 and 2.Google Scholar

122 Leszek Buszynski, ‘Southeast Asia in the post-Cold War Era: Regionalism and Security’ (1992) Asian Survey, Volume 32, No. 9, 830–847. See Nicholas Tarling, Regionalism in Southeast Asia: To Foster the Political Will (Routledge, United Kingdom, 2006).Google Scholar

123 See Paul J. Davidson, ASEAN: The Evolving legal Framework for Economic Cooperation (Times Academic Press, Singapore, 2002); ASEAN Law Association, ASEAN Legal Systems (Butterworths Asia, 1995); Alan Khee-jin Tan, ‘Recent Institutional Developments on the Environment in Southeast Asia – A Report Card on the Region’ (2002) Sing. J. Int'l & Comp. L. 6, 891–908.Google Scholar

124 See ARF overview at http://www.aseanregionalforum.org/AboutUs/tabid/57/Default.aspx (last visited 20 August 2007).Google Scholar

125 See Zone of Peace, Freedom, and Neutrality Declaration, Kuala Lumpur, 27 November 1971.Google Scholar

Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/1215.htm (last visited 18 August 2007); Treaty on the Southeast Asia Nuclear Weapon-Free Zone, Bangkok, Thailand, 15 December 1995. Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/2082.htm (last visited 18 August 2007).Google Scholar

126 See Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, 4 November 2002.Google Scholar

127 See overview of ARF history and developments at http://www.aseansec.org/92.htm (last visited 18 August 2007).Google Scholar

128 Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/1814.htm (last visited 18 August 2007).Google Scholar

129 See Hanoi Plan of Action, Hanoi, Vietnam, 15 December 1988. Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/687.htm (last visited 18 August 2007); Agreement on the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) Scheme for the ASEAN Free Trade Area, Singapore, 28 January 1992. Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/1164.htm (last visited 18 August 2007); Protocol to Amend the Framework Agreement on Enhancing ASEAN Economic Cooperation, Thailand, 15 December 1995. Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/2083.htm (last visited 18 August 2007).Google Scholar

130 Singapore Declaration on the ASEAN Charter, 20 November 2007.Google Scholar

131 Cebu Declaration on the Blueprint of the ASEAN Charter, 13 January 2007.Google Scholar

132 Latest macroeconomic indicators from http://www.aseansec.org (last visited 28 May 2008).Google Scholar

133 ASEAN Charter, Chapter XIII, Article 47(4).Google Scholar

134 CASANOVAS, ORIOL. UNITY AND PLURALISM IN PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW. (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2001), at pp. 124–125.Google Scholar

135 “ASEAN to Pursue Constructive Engagement With Myanmar after Power Struggle”, October 25, 2004, at http://www.aseansec.org/afp/78.htm (last visited 28 May 2008).Google Scholar

136 Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/1814.htm (last visited 18 August 2007).Google Scholar

137 Hanoi Plan of Action, Hanoi, Vietnam, 15 December 1988. Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/687.htm (last visited 18 August 2007); Agreement on the Common Effective Preferential Tariff (CEPT) Scheme for the ASEAN Free Trade Area, Singapore, 28 January 1992. Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/1164.htm (last visited 18 August 2007); Protocol to Amend the Framework Agreement on Enhancing ASEAN Economic Cooperation, Thailand, 15 December 1995. Full text at: http://www.aseansec.org/2083.htm (last visited 18 August 2007).Google Scholar

138 “Draft ASEAN Charter calls for human rights body, upholds noninterference policy”, The Associated Press, November 8, 2007, at http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2007/11/09/asia/AS-GEN-ASEAN-Charter.php (last visited 28 May 2008).Google Scholar

139 ASEAN Charter, Chapter II, Article 3.Google Scholar

140 ASEAN Charter, Chapter I, Article 1(7).Google Scholar

141 ASEAN Charter, Chapter 1, Articles 2(2h) and 2(2i).Google Scholar

142 ASEAN Charter, Chapter 1, Articles 2(2j), 2(2k), 2(21), 2(2m), 2(2n).Google Scholar

143 ASEAN Charter, Chapter IV, Article 7, and Chapter VII, Article 20.Google Scholar

144 ASEAN Charter, Chapter IV, Article 8.Google Scholar

145 ASEAN Charter, Chapter IV, Article 9.Google Scholar

146 ASEAN Charter, Chapter IV, Articles 10, 11, 12, 13, 15.Google Scholar

147 ASEAN Charter, Chapter IV, Article 14.Google Scholar

148 ASEAN Charter, Chapter III, Article 5(2), Chapter VIII, Articles 23–28.Google Scholar

149 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, Article 18(1).Google Scholar

150 See http://www.unhcr.org (last visited 18 August 2007) for the status of ASEAN member states’ signatures, ratifications, accessions to the ‘core’ human rights treaties on civil and political rights.Google Scholar

151 See Vienna Declaration and Programme of Action, 5, U.N. Doc. A/CONF.157/23. Full text at: http://www.ohchr.org/english/law/vienna.htm (last visited 23 August 2007); UNESCO Universal Declaration on Cultural Diversity, Articles 2, 4, and 5.Google Scholar

152 Under the CEPT scheme, the ASEAN Free Trade Area does not apply a common external tariff on imported goods. ASEAN members can apply a tariff rate of 0 to 5 percent on goods originating within ASEAN, while they can impose tariffs based on their national schedules for goods entering outside of ASEAN. Exclusions from the CEPT scheme are optional upon ASEAN members for temporary exclusions, sensitive agricultural products, and some general exceptions. See http://www.aseansec.org (last visited 28 May 2008).Google Scholar

153 Thio, Li-ann. “Implementing Human Rights in ASEAN Countries: ‘Promises to Keep and Miles to Go Before I Sleep”, 2 Yale Hum. Rts. & Dev. L.J. 1 (1999).Google Scholar

154 ASEAN Charter, Chapter II (Legal Personality), Article 3.Google Scholar

155 ASEAN Charter, Chapter VI, Article 17. Chapter VI, Article 19(2) also provides that “the conditions of immunities and privileges of the Permanent Representatives and officials on ASEAN duties shall be governed by the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations or in accordance with the national law of the ASEAN State concerned.”Google Scholar

156 Preamble to the ASEAN Charter, Seventh Clause.Google Scholar

157 ASEAN Charter, Chapter I, Article 2 (Principles), Section 2(i).Google Scholar

158 ASEAN Charter, Chapter I, Article 2 (Principles), Section 2(h).Google Scholar

159 ASEAN Charter, Chapter III (Membership), Article 5(2)Google Scholar

160 ASEAN Charter, Chapter VII (Decision-Making), Article 20(1).Google Scholar

161 ASEAN Charter, Chapter VII, Article 20(2).Google Scholar

162 KLABBERS, JAN. AN INTRODUCTION TO INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTIONAL LAW. (Cambridge University Press, 2002), at Pp. 54 57. See also Reparation of Injuries Suffered in the Service of the United Nations, Advisory Opinion, ICJ Reports 1949, p. 178–179, and 185.Google Scholar

163 KLABBERS, at pp. 311–312.Google Scholar