Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T17:37:54.731Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Official Version Authenticating, Preserving and Citing Legal Information in Digital Form

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Extract

In November of 1997, the Canadian Association of Law Libraries/Association canadienne des bibliothèques de droit, and the Legal Research Network staged a symposium titled The Official Version. The purpose of the symposium was to address some of the problems and challenges related to legal documentation in digital form. Most of us in the profession in Canada refer to it as “the summit”, an allusion to the rather arrogant sub-title: “A National Summit to Solve the Problems of Authenticating, Preserving and Citing Legal Information in Digital Form”.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © 1998 by the International Association of Law Libraries 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 “The Official Version”: a National Summit to Solve the Problems of Authenticating, Preserving and Citing Legal Information in Digital Form, November 20–22, 1997: Proceedings. Kingston: CALL/ACBD, 1998. p. i.Google Scholar

2 Ibid. p.25, col. 1Google Scholar

3 For elaboration of Jeff Rothenberg's argument, see his, “Ensuring the Longevity of Digital Documents,” 272 Scientific American 42–7 (January 1995).Google Scholar

4 Claire M. Germain, Director, Cornell University Law Library and Chair, AALL/Law Library of Congress Digital Law Task Force.Google Scholar

5 A Model Judgments Handling System for Canadian Courts. Ottawa: Canadian Law Information Council, 1981.Google Scholar

6 See Declaration for the Elaboration of a Vendor Neutral Citation Proposal in Canada, http://www.droit.umontreal.ca/citation/index.html.Google Scholar

7 Standards for the Preparation, Distribution and Citation of Canadian Judgments in Electronic Form, Judges Computer Advisory Committee of the Canadian Judicial Council, May 1996. http://www.integeractif.com/cjc.htm.Google Scholar

8 An International System for the Citation of Court Opinions, QLSystems, May 1997. http://www.qlsys.com. Also, see note 7 above.Google Scholar

9 See Note 5.Google Scholar