No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Legal Traditions of the World: Sustainable Diversity in Law. By H. Patrick Glenn. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000. Pp. xxiv, 371. ISBN 0-19-876575-4. GB£22.99.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
Abstract
An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Book Reviews
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2003 by the International Association of Law Libraries
References
10. “The original Visigothic laws, wholly based upon oral tradition, were first reduced to order and committed to writing by Euric, at Arles, in the latter half of the fifth century. This collection is unfortunately lost, but many of its provisions were incorporated into the Visigothic Code, although, no doubt, subjected to important and numerous modifications in the course of centuries. At the beginning of the sixth century, Alaric II promulgated the Breviarium Alaricianum, a body of laws compiled mainly from the Codes of Justinian and Theodosius, which collection was the source of the subsequent Lombard and Bavarian Codes. From the two compilations of Euric and Alaric, under the reigns of Kings Chintasvintus and Recesvintus (649-652) was formed the Forum Judicum, or Visigothic Code …” Preface, The Visigothic Code (Forum Judicum) (Scott, S.P., ed. and trans.); Library of Iberian Resources Online, <http://libro.uca.edu/vcode/visigoths.htm> [online version of S.P. Scott, The Visigothic Code (Forum Juridicum). Littleton, CO: Rothman, 1982 reprint; originally published, Boston: Boston Book Co., 1910].+[online+version+of+S.P.+Scott,+The+Visigothic+Code+(Forum+Juridicum).+Littleton,+CO:+Rothman,+1982+reprint;+originally+published,+Boston:+Boston+Book+Co.,+1910].>Google Scholar
11.
Merryman, John Henry, The Civil Law Tradition: Europe, Latin America, and East Asia (1994); David, René (and others) Major Legal Systems in the World Today: An Introduction to the Comparative Study of Law (1985).Google Scholar