¹ Convention on the Protection of the Marine Environment of the Baltic Sea Area of March 22, 1974, reprinted in 13 International Legal Material 544 (1974).Google Scholar

² By way of an example, it will focus on the input of nitrogen and phosphorus and eutrophication.Google Scholar

³ Therefore, the turnover time for Baltic Sea water is estimated to be as long as 25 years for a 90% exchange; see T.O. Kaasik, “The Geography of the Baltic Sea Region” in A.H. Westing, ed., Comprehensive Regional Security for the Baltic—An Environmental Approach (Oslo: International Peace Research Institute 1989) 15 at 19.Google Scholar

⁴ A.H. Westing, “Environmental Approaches to Regional Security” in Westing, ed., supra, note 3 at 3; see as well, B.A. Boczek, “The Baltic Sea: A Study in Marine Regionalism,” 23 German Yearbook of International Law, 196 at 205ff (hereinafter, Baltic Sea) (1980).Google Scholar

⁵ E. Leppäkoski, “Man's Impact on the Baltic Ecosystem,” 9 AMBIO 174 at 175 (1980).Google Scholar

⁶ B.A. Boczek, “International Protection of the Baltic Sea Environment Against pollution: A Study in Marine Regionalism” 72 American Journal of International Law 782 at 787 (1978) (hereinafter, Boczek, International Protection); and L. Zmudzinski, “Environmental Quality in the Baltic Region” in Westing, ed., supra, note 3, 46 at 48ff for a more comprehensive picture of the Baltic Sea's ecological situation.Google Scholar

⁷ Nordic Council of Ministers, Europe's Air—Europe's Environment (Stockholm 1986) at 66; OECD, The State of the Environment 1985 (Paris: OECD, 1985) at 84; Leppäkoski, supra, note 5 at 174.Google Scholar

⁸ Eutrophication becomes a concern when the number of plants, algae and other organisms rapidly increases and their subsequent decomposition results in a shortage of oxygen which, in turn, kills other plants and animals; see Zmudzinski, supra, note 6 at 50; Nordic Council of Ministers, supra, note 7, 65ff.Google Scholar

⁹ Nordic Council of Ministers, supra, note 7 at 68.Google Scholar

¹⁰ The National Swedish Environmental Protection Board estimated the total input in the 1980s to be 1,197,500 tons of nitrogen and 77,300 tons of phosphorous; see Nordic Council of Ministers, supra, note 7 at 67. On industrial pollutant input in general, see L. Bruneau, “pollution from Industries in the Drainage Age of the Baltic, 9 AMBIO 145 (1980).Google Scholar

¹¹ Zmudzinski, supra, note 6 at 50.Google Scholar

¹² For data, see Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission—Helsinki Commission, Deposition of Airborne Pollutants to the Baltic Sea Area 1983-1985 and 1986, Baltic Sea Environment Proceedings, No. 32 (Helsinki 1989) at 3, 7 (hereinafter HELCOM, No. 32).Google Scholar

¹³ Leppakoski, supra, note 5 at 180.Google Scholar

¹⁴ But see Article 4(3), which calls upon the parties to ensure the attainment of the convention's purposes regardless.Google Scholar

¹⁵ No reservations may be made to the convention; see Article 25.Google Scholar

¹⁶ See infra, note 26 and accompanying text, as well as Article 24(1) and (2) of the convention.Google Scholar

¹⁷ On the positive effect of this measure, see supra, note 13 and accompanying text.Google Scholar

¹⁸ For a good overview, see B. Johnson, “The Baltic Convention” 25 International and Comparative Law Quarterly 1 at 9–11 (1976).Google Scholar

¹⁹ International Convention for the Prevention of pollution from Ships, November 2, 1973, reprinted in 12 International Legal Material 1319 (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

²⁰ See M. Tulokas, “The Baltic Sea and pollution” (1981) 25 Scandinavian Studies in Law 205 at 218, 219; the significance of the adoption of MARPOL's annexes lies in the fact that Annexes III and IV are applicable in the Baltic although they have not entered into force under MARPOL.Google Scholar

²¹ Boczek, Baltic Sea, supra, note 4 at 217; Tulokas, supra, note 20 at 220, 221; the London Convention is reprinted in 11 International Legal Material 1294 (1972).Google Scholar

²² For an overview, see Johnson, supra, note 18 at 11, 12.Google Scholar

²³ See J. Brunnee, Acid Rain and Ozone Layer Depletion—International Law and Regulation (Dobbs Ferry: Transnational Publishers, 1988) at 9, 82 (hereinafter Brunnée, Acid Rain and Ozone Layer Depletion).Google Scholar

²⁴ On air pollution in the USSR and Eastern Europe, see J. McCormick, Acid Earth—The Global Threat of Acid pollution (London: Earthscan, 1985) 113ff; F. Painton, “Darkness at Noon,” TIME, April 9, 1990, 50; M. Simons, “Rising Iron Curtain Exposes Haunting Veil of pollution,” The New York Times, April 8, 1990, 1.Google Scholar

²⁵ Tulokas, supra, note 20 at 216, 217.Google Scholar

²⁶ See Article 13 for more detail on HELCOM's powers; all of its decisions must be taken unanimously (Article 12(5)).Google Scholar

²⁷ See H. Rohde, R. Söderlund and J. Ekstedt, “Deposition of Airborne Pollutants on the Baltic,” 9 AMBIO 168 at 173 (references) (1980).Google Scholar

²⁸ See, e.g., Seminar on Diffusity, Transport and Deposition Processes of Atmospheric Pollutants to the Baltic Sea Area; held in conjunction with the Third Meeting of the ad hoc Group of Experts on Airborne pollution of the Baltic Sea Area (EGAP) of the Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission—Helsinki Commission, Neubrandenburg, The German Democratic Republic, 7-8 May 1986.Google Scholar

²⁹ See HELCOM, No. 32, supra, note 12 and accompanying text.Google Scholar

³⁰ Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission—Helsinki Commission—Seventh Meeting of the Group of Experts on Airborne pollution of the Baltic Sea Area, Helsinki, Finland, 24-27 April 1990, EGAP 7/10, at 5 (hereinafter HELCOM, Seventh Meeting).Google Scholar

³¹ Id., Annex 4.Google Scholar

³² Id., Annex 6; and Steering Body to EMEP, Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air pollution, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Report of the Thirteenth Session, 15 September 1989, EB.AIR/GE. 1/14 at 8.Google Scholar

³³ HELCOM, Seventh Meeting, supra, note 20, Annex 7.Google Scholar

³⁴ Information kindly provided by Ambassador Pertti Harvola, Legal Department of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Helsinki, Finland, letter of June 21, 1990.Google Scholar

³⁵ Id.Google Scholar

³⁶ Id.Google Scholar

³⁷ Id.Google Scholar

³⁸ See in this context, Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission—Helsinki Commission—Report of the Third Meeting of the Working Group on Reduction of Industrial Discharges (RID), Lübeck, Federal Republic of Germany, 14-18 May 1990, RID 3/10 (hereinafter HELCOM/RID, Third Meeting).Google Scholar

³⁹ See in the latter context related ECE activities, Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air pollution, UN Economic Commission for Europe, Report of the Seventh Session of the Executive Body, UN ECE Doc. ECE/EB.AIR 130, 20 December 1989, Annex II.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Baltic Marine Environment Protection Commission—Helsinki Commission—Eleventh Meeting, Helsinki, 13-16 February 1990, Tasks of the HELCOM ad hoc Group for Revision of the Convention, HELCOM 11/14, Annex 2B (hereinafter HELCOM, Eleventh Meeting).Google Scholar

⁴¹ Harvola, supra, note 34.Google Scholar

⁴² See HELCOM, Eleventh Meeting, supra, note 40.Google Scholar

⁴³ See HELCOM/RID, Third Meeting, supra, note 38, Annex 5, for detail on the suggested criteria.Google Scholar

⁴⁴ HELCOM, Eleventh Meeting, supra, note 40.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Convention for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against pollution, February 16, 1976, reprinted in 15 International Legal Material 285 (1976).Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Protocol for the Protection of the Mediterranean Sea Against pollution from Land-Based Sources, Athens, May 17, 1980, reprinted in 19 International Legal Material 863 (1980).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Report of the ad hoc Meeting for the Preparation of the Annex IV of Land-Based Sources Protocol to the Barcelona Convention, Athens, 19–21 December 1988, UNEP (OCA)/NED WG. 6/1, 21 December 1988.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Information kindly provided by A. Soudine, Senior Scientific Officer, Environment Division, WMO, Geneva: letter of May 24, 1990.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ UNEP (OCA)/MED WG. 12/5, 5 April 1990.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Id., under 2.Google Scholar

⁵¹ Id., under 5.Google Scholar

⁵² See Bozcek, International Protection, supra, note 6 at 812.Google Scholar

⁵³ Sceptical: Sounine, supra, note 48.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ See infra, note 79 and accompanying text.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ On development and scope of the existing customary rule, see Brunnee, Acid Rain and Ozone Layer Depletion, at 83ff (refer to footnote 23); J. Ehmer, Der Grundsatz der Freiheit der Meere und das Verbot der Meeresver-Schmutzung, Schriften zum Völkerrecht, Bd.32 (1973) at 113.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Trail Smelter case, III U.N.R.I.A.A. 1905 at 1907 (1941); Corfu Channel case, [1949] International Court of Justice Reporter 4 at 22.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Lac Lanoux case, XII R.I.A.A. at 315 (1957).Google Scholar

⁵⁸ See A.E. Boyle, “Marine pollution under the Law of the Sea Convention,” 79 American Journal of International Law 347 at 366 (1985); R. Soni, Control of Marine pollution in International Law (Cape Town: Juta, 1985) at 140.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ See Trail Smelter case, supra, note 56; Principle 21 of the Stockholm Declaration, UN Declaration on the Human Environment (Stockholm Declaration), reprinted in (1972), 11 International Legal Materials 1416.Google Scholar

⁶⁰ See supra, note 8 and accompanying text; and HELCOM, No. 32, supra, note 12 at 3, 7, and 11.Google Scholar

⁶¹ See Brunnee, Acid Rain and Ozone Layer Depletion, supra, note 23 at 136.Google Scholar

⁶² See A. Cassese, International Law in a Divided World (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1986) 376-392; Article 19(d) of the International Law Commission's Draft Articles on State Responsibility, YBILC 1980 II (Part 2); J. Brunnee, “Common Interest—Echoes From an Empty Shell? Some Thought on Common Interest and International Environmental Law” 49 Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht 791 at 800ff (1989); and Soni, supra, note 58 at 69–72, 142ff.Google Scholar

⁶³ Reprinted in 21 International Legal Material 1261 (1982).Google Scholar

⁶⁴ Boyle, supra, note 58 at 351.Google Scholar

⁶⁵ Id., at 353ff.Google Scholar

⁶⁶ Id., at 354.Google Scholar

⁶⁷ See Articles 211(2), 208(3), and 210(6) of the Law of the Sea Convention.Google Scholar

⁶⁸ Reprinted in 13 International Legal Material 352 (1974).Google Scholar

⁶⁹ Reprinted in K.R. Simmonds, ed., New Directions in the Law of the Sea, Release 88-2 (New York: Oceana Publications), J.29.Google Scholar

⁷⁰ See Bozcek, Baltic Sea, supra, note 4 at 212.Google Scholar

⁷¹ See Brunnee, Acid Rain and Ozone Layer Depletion, supra, note 23 at 174.Google Scholar

⁷² Id., at 172, 173.Google Scholar

⁷³ Reprinted in 18 International Legal Material 1442 (1979).Google Scholar

⁷⁴ On membership as of September 15, 1989, see Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air pollution, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Annual Review of Strategies for Air pollution Abatement, UN ECE Doc. ECE/EB.AIR/R.40, September 26, 1989 at 15 (hereinafter EB.AIR, Annual Review).Google Scholar

⁷⁵ Brunnée, Acid Rain and Ozone Layer Depletion, supra, note 55 at 184, 185.Google Scholar

⁷⁶ Protocol to the 1979 Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air pollution on the Reduction of Sulphur Emissions by at least 30%, in Executive Body for the Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air pollution, United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Report of the Third Session of the Executive Body, UN ECE Doc. ECE/EB.AIR 18, Annex I, August 6, 1985.Google Scholar

⁷⁷ A. Fraenkel, “The Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air pollution: Meeting the Challenge of International Cooperation,” 30/2 Harvard International Law Journal 447 at 470 (1989).Google Scholar

⁷⁸ Id. at 473; the Protocol to the 1979 ECE Convention on Long-Range Transboundary Air pollution Concerning the Control of Emissions of Nitrogen Oxides or Their Transboundary Fluxes, October 31, 1988, is reprinted in (1989) 28 International Legal Material 212.Google Scholar

⁷⁹ Personal communication, Dr. Hans Martin, Director, Air Quality and Interenvironmental Research Branch, Atmospheric Environment Service, Environment Canada, March 30, 1990.Google Scholar

⁸⁰ Id.Google Scholar

⁸¹ Poland, which has not signed the Helsinki Protocol, is an exception; see EB.AIR, Annual Review, supra, note 74 at 21.Google Scholar

⁸² Protocol on the Long-Term Financing of EMEP, September 28, 1984, reprinted in 24 International Legal Material 484 (1985).Google Scholar

⁸³ Fraenkel, supra, note 77 at 460.Google Scholar

⁸⁴ See Brunnee, Acid Rain and Ozone Layer Depletion, supra, note 55 at 162ff.Google Scholar

⁸⁵ Id. at 166ff; O. Lomas, “Environmental Protection, Economic Conflict and the European Communities,” 33 McGill Law Journal 506, 519ff. (1988).Google Scholar

⁸⁶ OJ No. C 328, 7.12.87, 43.Google Scholar

⁸⁷ Id., 44.Google Scholar

⁸⁸ Id., 2.Google Scholar

⁸⁹ Id., 18.Google Scholar

⁹⁰ Id., 24.Google Scholar

⁹¹ Id., 37.Google Scholar