Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T04:45:49.524Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Death Penalty: Developments in Caribbean Jurisprudence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Lord Anthony Gifford
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

I thank the International Association of Law Libraries for your warm hospitality. I am glad to have had the chance to meet with you and learn about your work, and I wish you well as you meet the challenges of the technological era where law books are giving way to internet links.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 37 , Issue 2 , Summer 2009 , pp. 196 - 203
Copyright
Copyright © 2009 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 State v Makwanyane and Another 1995 (3) SA 391.Google Scholar

2 The Guardian, Tuesday, 13 November 2007, available at http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/nov/l3/comment.comment/print (last visited October 30, 2009).Google Scholar

3 United Nations GA/10678; see www.un.org/news/press/docs/2007-/ga10678.doc.htm.Google Scholar

4 Pratt and Morgan v Attorney General (1993) 43 WIR 430.Google Scholar

5 Id.Google Scholar

6 Neville Lewis and Others v Attorney General (2000) 57 WIR 275.Google Scholar

7 Though I believe he was wrong.Google Scholar

8 Reyes v R (2002) 60 WIR 42.Google Scholar

9 Fox v R (2002) 61 WIR 169.Google Scholar

10 R v Hughes (2002) 60 WIR 16.Google Scholar

11 Watson v R (2004) 64 WIR 241.Google Scholar

12 Matthew v the State (2004) 64 WIR 412.Google Scholar

13 Boyce and Joseph v R (2004) WIR 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar

14 Joseph and Boyce v Attorney General (2006). See judgement at www.caribbeancourtofjustice.org.Google Scholar

15 See note 10, supra.Google Scholar