Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:33:14.808Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Cooperation Between Antitrust Agencies at the International Level. By Bruno Zanettin. Oxford; Portland OR: Hart Publishing, 2002. Pp. xxiii, 307. ISBN 1-84113-351-5. GB£53.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Katherine Topulos  and
Victor Essien
Victor Essien
Affiliation:
Leo T. Kissam Memorial Library, Fordham Law School New York, New York, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 32 , Issue 3 , Winter 2004 , pp. 642 - 647
Copyright
Copyright © 2004 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

4 Agreement Between the Government of the United States and Commission of the European Communities Regarding the Application of their Competition Laws, Sept. 23, 1991, 1995 O.J. (L 95) 45, corrected at 1995 O.J. (L 131) 38.Google Scholar

5 148 F.2d 416 (2d Cir. 1945).Google Scholar

6 326 U.S. 310 (1945).Google Scholar

7 509 U.S. 764, 782 (1993).Google Scholar

8 Case 48/69, 1972 E.C.R. 619.Google Scholar

9 Case 89/85, Ahlstrom & Others v. Comm'n of the European Communities, 1988 E.C.R. 5193.Google Scholar

10 Case T-102/96, Gencor v. Comm'n, 1999 E.C.R.-II 753.Google Scholar

11 Commission Decision of July 6, 2000, 2001 O.J. (L152) 24.Google Scholar

12 Commission Decision of December 8, 1999, 2003 O. J. (L 140)1.Google Scholar

13 Commission Decision of July 30, 1997, 1997 O.J. (L 336)16.Google Scholar

14 Case 60/81, IBM v. Commission, 1981 E.C.R. 2639.Google Scholar

15 Agreement Between the Government of the United States of America and the Government of Australia Relating to Cooperation on Antitrust Matters, June 29, 1982, T.I.A.S. No. 10365 and Memorandum of Understanding between the United States and Canada as to Notification, Consultation, and Cooperation with Respect to the Application of National Antitrust Laws, March 9, 1984, 23 I.L.M. 275 (1984).Google Scholar

16 Agreement Between the European Communities and the Government of Canada Regarding the Application of Their Competition Laws, 1999 O.J. (L 175).Google Scholar

17 Commission Decision of July 3, 2001, 2004 O. J. (L 048) 1.Google Scholar

18 15 U.S.C. §§6201-6212.Google Scholar

19 Positive comity, according to the OECD, Committee on Competition Law and Policy, Report on Positive Comity, is defined as:Google Scholar

“the principle that a country should (1) give full and sympathetic consideration to another country's request that it opens or expands a law enforcement proceeding in order to remedy conduct in its territory that is substantially and adversely affecting another country's interests and (2) take whatever remedial action it deems appropriate on a voluntary basis and in considering its legitimate interests.”Google Scholar

20 Agreement Between the European Communities and the Government of the United States of America Regarding the Application of Positive Comity Principles in the Enforcement of their Competition Laws, June 4, 1998, 1998 O.J. (L 173).Google Scholar