No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Australian Federalism and the Role of the Governor-General
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
Extract
Australia is both a federation and a constitutional monarchy. The Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, which made the Australian Constitution law, refers to the establishment of the federation “under the Crown of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland.” In fact, however, since 1973, the appropriate style of the monarch in relation to Australia has been “Queen of Australia.” And ever since federation, the monarch has been represented in Australia by a Governor-General, who progressively has acquired a more significant role, in parallel with the acquisition of Australian independence.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2000 by the International Association of Law Libraries
References
Notes
1. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900, preamble.Google Scholar
2. Royal Style and Titles Act 1973.Google Scholar
3. Australian Constitution section 106.Google Scholar
4. Both referendums were defeated, by a national majority and by majorities in all States.Google Scholar
5. Constitution Alteration (Preamble) 1999.Google Scholar
6. Constitution Alteration (Establishment of Republic) 1999.Google Scholar
7. Australian Constitution, sections 62–64.Google Scholar
8. Republic Advisory Committee, An Australian Republic: The Options (AGPS 1993), 29.Google Scholar
9. Statue of Westminster Adoption Act 1942 (Commonwealth).Google Scholar
10. Sue v Hill (1999) 73 ALJR 1016.Google Scholar
11. Summary of Proceedings of the Imperial Conference 1926, Commonwealth Parliamentary Papers, 1926-7-8, volume 5, page 1049.Google Scholar
12. Crisp, The Appointment of Sir Isaac Isaacs as Governor-General of Australia 1930 (1964) 11 Historical Studies 253.Google Scholar
13. Both documents quoted in Howard, Colin and Saunders, Cheryl, Cases and Materials on Constitutional Law, Law Book Company 1979, pages 124–5.Google Scholar
14. Section 7.Google Scholar
15. Australian Constitution Section 128.Google Scholar
16. Galligan, B. and Nethercote, JR, Constitutional Commission and the 1988 Referendums (1989) 137–146.Google Scholar
17. Republic Advisory Committee, An Australian Republic: The Options, AGPS, 1993.Google Scholar
18. Legal Information Access Centre, A Republic?, Hot Topics No 22, (1999), 5.Google Scholar
19. Ibid. Google Scholar
20. Australasian Federal Convention.Google Scholar
21. Queensland did not participate at this stage. The colony that sent a parliamentary delegation was Western Australia.Google Scholar
22. Cheryl Saunders, “How Important Was The Convention?” (1998) 21 University of New South Wales Law Journal, 268.Google Scholar
23. Proposed section 59.Google Scholar
24. Proposed section 60.Google Scholar
25. Ibid. Google Scholar
26. Ibid. Google Scholar
27. Proposed section 59.Google Scholar
28. Proposed section 63.Google Scholar
29. Section 7.Google Scholar
30. Section 53.Google Scholar
31. Section 57.Google Scholar
32. Australian Constitution, section 53.Google Scholar
33. Howard, Colin & Saunders, Cheryl, “Blocking of the Budget and Dismissal of the Government” in Evans, Gareth (ed), Labor and the Constitution 1972-75, Heinemann, Melbourne (1977), 251.Google Scholar
34. Australian Constitution, section 64.Google Scholar
35. Constitution Alteration (Establishment of Republic) 1999, schedule 3, clause 6.Google Scholar
36. Sue v Hill, (1999) 73 ALJR 1016, 1030.Google Scholar
37. Saunders, Cheryl, “Fiscal Federalism – A General and Unholy Scramble” in Craven, Greg (ed) Australian Federalism: Towards the Second Century, Melbourne University Press, 1992) 101.Google Scholar
38. Statute of Westminster 1931, section 9.Google Scholar
39. In 1968 and 1975.Google Scholar
40. Australia Acts 1986, section 7, 15.Google Scholar
41. Schedule 3, Clause 5.Google Scholar
42. Report of the Constitutional Convention 2-13 February 1998, Convention Communiqué.Google Scholar
43. Australia Acts 1986, section 15.Google Scholar
44. Minister for Works (WA) v Gulson (1944) 69 CLR 338, 350–351.Google Scholar
45. Proposed section 59.Google Scholar
46. Clause 63.Google Scholar