Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T01:19:54.219Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Wrestlemania: The Gender Factor in the 2016 Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2018

Catherine V. Scott
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Part of the reason Hillary Clinton's loss in the Electoral College was such a surprise was that the two major obstacles faced by female candidates and politicians appeared to have been cleared by Clinton. The first is what I call “barriers to entry.” The research has long suggested (although some of it is now being challenged) that women cannot raise money as effectively as men, they are less likely to be asked to run for a vacant seat, they are less likely to have a secure place in the old boy's network, less able to point to vast experience as a qualification, and more likely to be burdened by childcare and family. Women of color face these hurdles in often particularly intense ways.

Type
Articles
Information
International Journal of Legal Information , Volume 46 , Issue 1 , March 2018 , pp. 56 - 60
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

2

© Catherine V. Scott 2018. The author is Professor of Political Science and Chair, Agnes Scott College, Decatur, Georgia, USA.

This is the text of a presentation delivered on October 22, 2017 at the International Association of Law Libraries, 36th Annual Course on International Law and Legal Information, Civil Rights, Human Rights, and Other Critical Issues in U.S. Law, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, October 22–26, 2017.

References

3 See, e.g., Lawless, Jennifer L., and Fox, Richard L.. Women, Men, and U.S. Politics: Ten Big Questions. New York: WW Norton. 2018Google Scholar.

4 Cottle, Michelle. 2008. Shattered. The New Republic. September 24. https://newrepublic.com/article/62311-/shattered

5 Karpf, David. Digital Politics after Trump, Annals of the International Communication Association, 41, 2. 2017Google Scholar.

6 Hofstadter, Richard. The Paranoid Style in American Politics. Harper's November. https://harpers.org/-archive/1964/11/the-paranoid-style-in-american-politics/. 1964.

7 Id.

8 Klein, Naomi. W.W.E. the People. Harper's, September 2017.

9 Trump, Donald, with Schwartz, Tony. The Art of the Deal. NY: Ballantine Books. 1987Google Scholar.

10 Trump, Donald. Think Big And Kick Ass in Business and Life. NY: Harper's. 2007Google Scholar.

11 D'Antonio, Michael. The Truth About Trump. NY: Thomas Dunne Books. 2016Google Scholar.

12 Trump, Donald. Great Again: How to Fix Our Crippled America. NY: Threshold Books. 2016Google Scholar.

13 Trump, Donald. Think Big And Kick Ass in Business and Life. NY: Harper's, p. 27. 2007Google Scholar.