Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
The comparative analysis of diverse constitutional orders enables a more sophisticated evaluation of the advantages and disadvantages of different models and solutions. Quite often it also serves practical objectives, providing the impulse for improving our own legal system by carefully adopting institutions and procedures that have proven themselves elsewhere. In the case of the Swiss Constitution, the influence of thoughts and concepts developed during the French Revolution and by the Founding Fathers of the U.S. Constitution is quite obvious. More recently, international influences are most apparent in the field of fundamental rights and freedoms.
1 See Häfelin, Ulrich/Haller, Walter, Schweizerisches Bundesstaatsrecht (5th edn., Zurich 2001), p. 23.Google Scholar
2 The Federal Constitution of 1848 was replaced by another constitutional document in 1874. However, the Federal Constitution of 1874, in force until the end of 1999, preserved the institutions and principles of the old constitution and thus only implied a “total” revision in a formal sense. Between 1874 and 1999, the FC was amended more than 140 times through partial revisions.Google Scholar
3 See Hamilton, Alexander/Madison, James/Jay, John, The Federalist Papers, a collection of 85 letters to the public that appeared in the newspapers of New York City in 1787 and 1788 and that has become one of the most famous works in political science.Google Scholar
4 Rousseau, Jean-Jacques, Du contrat social ou principes du droit politique, first published in 1762.Google Scholar
5 Locke, John, Second Treatise of Government, first published in 1690.Google Scholar
6 de Secondat, Charles, Baron de la Brède et de Montesquieu, De l'esprit des lois, first published in 1748.Google Scholar
7 See Kölz, Alfred, “Die Bedeutung der französischen Revolution für das schweizerische öffentliche Recht und politische System,” in: Der Weg der Schweiz zum modernen Bundesstaat: Historische Abhandlungen (Zurich 1998), esp. p. 27–33.Google Scholar
8 See Cronin, Thomas E., Direct Democracy (Cambridge Mass./London 1989), p. 48.Google Scholar
9 Cronin, , l.c., p. 129–131.Google Scholar
10 Kölz, Alfred, “Geschichtliche Grundlagen,” in: Verfassungsrecht der Schweiz (edited by Thürer, Daniel, Aubert, Jean-François and Müller, Jörg Paul, Zurich 2001), p. 113.Google Scholar
11 BGE (Entscheidungen des Schweizerischen Bundesgerichts) 101 Ia 67.Google Scholar
12 Example: BGE 120 Ia 254/55.Google Scholar
13 Art. 4 FC.Google Scholar
14 Art. 1 FC.Google Scholar
15 Art. 37 FC.Google Scholar
16 Art. 46 FC.Google Scholar
17 Art. 175 FC.Google Scholar
18 Art. 177 FC.Google Scholar
19 Art. 176 FC.Google Scholar
20 Art. 148–150 and 156 FC.Google Scholar
21 Art. 12 FC is worth mentioning. It guarantees “persons in distress and incapable of looking after themselves … the right to be helped and assisted, and to receive the means that are essential for leading a life in human dignity.”Google Scholar
22 Art. 140 section 1 letter a and 195 FC.Google Scholar
23 Art. 140 section 1 letter b FC.Google Scholar
24 Art. 141 FC.Google Scholar
25 Art. 138, 139, 193 and 194 FC.Google Scholar