¹ See, for example, Wigmore, John H., “Louisiana: The Story of its Legal System,” Tulane Law Review 1 (1916): 1–45; Dart, Henry Plauché, “The Legal Institutions of Louisiana,” ibid., 3 (1918): 254–80; Charbonneau, Thomas E., Combe, David A., and Herman, Shael, The Louisiana Civil Code: A Humanistic Appraisal (New Orleans, 1981); Palmer, Vernon Valentine, ed., Louisiana: Microcosm of a Mixed Jurisdiction (Durham, N.C., 1999). That view has also suffused more popular writing, such as Flake, Carol, New Orleans: Behind the Masks of America's Most Exotic City (New York, 1994), 64–67. Recently, though, it has come under scrutiny and revision. See Billings, Warren M. and Fernandez, Mark F., eds., A Law Unto Itself? Essays in the New Louisiana Legal History (Baton Rouge, 2001).Google Scholar

² The origin of the myth is treated in my introduction to Schafer, Judith Kelleher and Billings, Warren M., eds., An Uncommon Experience: Law and Judicial Institutions in Louisiana, 1803–2003 (Lafayette, La., 1997), 11–17 and Fernandez, Mark F., “Louisiana Legal History: Past, Present, and Future,” in Billings and Fernandez, eds., A Law Unto Itself, 1–23.Google Scholar

³ Treaty ceding Louisiana, 30 April 1803 in Francis Newton Thorpe, comp., The Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters, and Other Organic Laws of the States, Territories, and Colonies Now or Heretofore Forming the United States of America (Washington, D.C., 1909) 3:1359–62; Convention Between the United States of America and the French Republic, 30 April 1803, ibid., 1362–63; “An Act to enable the President of the United States to take possession of the territories ceded by France to the United States by treaty concluded in Paris, on the thirtieth of April last, and for the temporary government thereof.” Eighth Congress, First Session, 1803, ibid., 1364; “An Act erecting Louisiana into two territories, and providing for the temporary government thereof.” Eighth Congress, Second Session, 1804, 3:1365–71.Google Scholar

⁴ Tregle, Joseph G., “William Charles Cole Claiborne,” in Conrad, Glenn R. et al., eds., Dictionary of Louisiana Biography (Lafayette, La., 1988) 2:180–81; Taylor, Joe Gray, “W.C.C. Claiborne,” in Dawson, Joseph G., ed., Louisiana's Governors: From Iberville to Edwards (Baton Rouge, 1990), 80–86.Google Scholar

⁵ Taylor, , “W.C.C Claiborne,” 86; Dargo, George, Jefferson's Louisiana: Politics and the Clash of Legal Traditions (Cambridge, Mass, 1975), 25–50; Fernandez, Mark F., “The Appellate Question: A Comparative Analysis of Supreme Courts of Appeal in Virginia and Louisiana, 1776–1840,” (Ph. D. diss., College of William and Mary, 1991), 110–15.Google Scholar

⁶ Fernandez, Mark F., From Chaos to Continuity: the Evolution of Louisiana's Judicial System, 1718–1862 (Baton Rouge, 2001), Chapter Three; Conrad, Glenn R., “Joshua Lewis,” in Conrad, Glenn R. et al., eds. Dictionary of Louisiana Biography (Lafayette, La., 1988), 1: 510; Dart, Elisabeth Kilbourne, “George Mathews,” ibid., 1: 557; Billings, Warren M., “The Supreme Court of Louisiana and Its Chief Justices,” Law Library Journal 89 (1997): 449–62; Pritchett, Carla Downer, “Case Law Reporters in Nineteenth-Century Louisiana,” in Billings and Fernandez, eds., A Law Unto Itself?, 59–63.Google Scholar

⁷ Fernandez, Mark F., “Local Justice in the Territory of Orleans: W. C. C. Claiborne's Courts, Judges, and Justices of the Peace,” in Billings and Fernandez, eds., A Law Unto Itself?, 79–99; and Fernandez, , From Chaos to Continuity, Chapter Three.Google Scholar

⁸ Gentry, Judith Fenner, “Pierre August Bourguignon Derbigny,” in Conrad et al., eds. Dictionary of Louisiana Biography, 1:238–40.Google Scholar

⁹ Chaillot, Jane B., “Elegius Fromentin,” ibid., 327.Google Scholar

¹⁰ Chaillot, Jane B., “Etienne Mazureau,” ibid., 559–60.Google Scholar

¹¹ Chaillot, Jane B., “Louis Casimir Elisabeth Moreau-Lislet,” ibid., 579–80.Google Scholar

¹² Gaspard, Elizabeth, “The Rise of the Louisiana Bar: The Early Period, 1813–1839,” Louisiana History, 28 (1987): 183–97.Google Scholar

¹³ Cook, Charles M., The American Codification Movement: A Study of Antebellum Legal Reform (Westport, Conn., 1981), 3–46.Google Scholar

¹⁴ Section 33, “An Act For the punishment of crimes and misdemeanors,” Acts Passed at the First Session of the Legislative Council of the Territory of Orleans (New Orleans, 1805), 440.Google Scholar

¹⁵ Billings, Warren M., “Origins of Criminal Law in Louisiana,” Louisiana History 22 (1991): 63–76.Google Scholar

¹⁶ Among the first works of its kind produced by an American treatise writer, the Exposition is also among the rarest such texts. Only six witnesses have been identified. Jumonville, Florence M., comp., Bibliography of New Orleans Imprints, 1765–1864 (New Orleans, 1989), 38. In 1989, Wm. Gaunt & Sons published a facsimile drawn from the witness that resides in the law library at Tulane University. That reprint is a convenient source text for anyone wishing to examine the Exposition at length. The custom of parallel printing in English and French began with the publication of the territorial acts in 1804 and it remained in use until the 1860s. English was regarded as the official language of the law after 1803.Google Scholar

¹⁷ Billings, Warren M., “A Neglected Treatise: Lewis Kerr's Exposition and the Making of Criminal Law in Louisiana,” Louisiana History 38 (1997): 261–87.Google Scholar

¹⁸ Concurrent Resolution of the Legislature of the Territory of Orleans, 17 June 1806, Acts Passed at the First Session of the First Legislature of the Territory of Orleans (New Orleans, 1807), 214–19.Google Scholar

¹⁹ The sources of the Digest have long been a bone of contention among Louisiana legal scholars. Some have argued long and vehemently for France as the predominant influence; others have contended with equal force for Spain. A representative sampling of the nature of the disputation is to be found in Dart, Henry Plauché, “The Influence of the Ancient Laws of Spain on the Jurisprudence of Louisiana,” Tulane Law Review, 6 (1931–32): 83–93; Franklin, Mitchell F., “The Place of Thomas Jefferson in the Expulsion of Spanish Medieval Law From Louisiana,” ibid. 16 (1941–42): 319–38; Franklin, , “The Eighteenth Brumaire in Louisiana: Talleyrand and the Spanish Medieval System of 1806,” ibid.: 514–61; Reynolds, C. Russell, “Alfonso el Sabio's Laws Survive in the Civil Code of Louisiana,” Louisiana History 12 (1971): 137–47; Tucker, John H. Jr., “Source Books of Louisiana Law,” Tulane Law Review 8 (1933–34): 396–405; Stone, Ferdinand, “The Civil Code of 1808 for the Territory of Orleans,” ibid. 33 (1958–59): 3–6; Hood, John T. Jr., “The History and Development of the Louisiana Civil Code,” ibid., 7–20; Baudoin, Louis, “The Influence of the Code Napoleon,” ibid.: 21–28; Franklin, Mitchell, “An Important Document in the History of American, Roman, and Civil Law: The De la Vergne Manuscript,” ibid., 35–42; Tucker, Thomas W., “Sources of Louisiana's Law of Persons: Blackstone, Domat, and the French Codes,” ibid. 45 (1970–71): 264–95; Batiza, Rodolpho, “The Louisiana Civil Code of 1808: Its Actual Sources and Present Relevance,” ibid. 46 (1971–72): 4–165; Sweeney, Joseph Modeste, “Tournament of Scholars over the Sources of the Civil Code of 1808,” ibid.: 585–603; Pascal, Robert A., “Sources of the Digest of 1808: A Reply to Professor Batiza,” ibid., 603–27; Batiza, Rodolpho, “Sources of the Digest of 1808, Facts and Speculation: A Rejoinder,” ibid., 628–53; Dainow, Joseph, “Moreau Lislet's Note on the Sources of Louisiana's Civil Code of 1808,” Louisiana Law Review 19 (1958–59): 43–51. However the systematic analysis of Richard Holcombe Kilbourne, Jr., A History of the Louisiana Civil Code: The Formative Years, 1803–1839 (Baton Rouge, 1987) settles the argument in favor of the predominance of Spanish influences.Google Scholar

²⁰ “An act to enable the people of the Territory of Louisiana to form a constitution and state government, and for the admission of such state into the Union, on an equal footing with the original states, and for other purposes,” Eleventh Congress, Third Session, 1811, Thorpe, comp., Federal and State Constitutions, 3: 1376.Google Scholar

²¹ The Mississippi River makes nearly a two hundred-seventy degree bend at New Orleans. Hence the synonym “Crescent City.”Google Scholar

²² “An Act Providing for the Election of Representatives to form a Convention and for Other Purposes,” Acts of the Second Session of the Third Legislature of the Territory of Orleans (New Orleans, 1811), 126.Google Scholar

²³ Morgan, Cecil, ed., The First Constitution of the State of Louisiana (Baton Rouge, 1975), 17, 19; Billings, Warren M., “From This Seed: The Constitution of 1812,” in Billings, Warren M. and Haas, Edward F., eds., In Search of Fundamental Law: Louisianan's Constitutions, 1812–1974 (Lafayette, La., 1993), 6–20.Google Scholar

²⁴ “An Act for the Admission of Louisiana,” Twelfth Congress, First session, 1812, Thorpe, comp., Federal and State Constitutions, 3:1378–80. The English version of the engrossed constitution has disappeared, but the French text is among the holdings of the Williams Research Center at The Historic New Orleans Collection in New Orleans.Google Scholar

²⁵ Telkampf, J. Louis, “On Codification, Or The Systematization of the Law,” American Jurist, 8 (1841–42): 113–44, 283–329; Hurst, J. Willard, Law and the Conditions of Freedom in the Nineteenth-Century United States (Madison, 1967); Bloomfield, Maxwell J., “William Sampson and the Codifiers: Roots of American Legal Reform, 1820–1830” American Journal of Legal History 11 (1967): 234–52; Gawalt, Gerard W., “Massachusetts Lawyers: A Historical Analysis of the Process of Professionalization, 1760–1840” (Ph.D. diss., Clark University, 1969); Friedman, Lawrence M., A History of American Law (New York, 1973), 202–64; Nelson, William E., The Americanization of the Common Law: The Impact of Legal Change in Massachusetts, 1776–1830 (Cambridge, Mass., 1975); Bloomfield, Maxwell J., American Lawyers in a Changing Society (New York, 1976); Cook, Charles M., The American Codification Movement, A Study in Legal Reform (Westport, Conn., 1981); Billings, Warren M., “An American Original: John Bouvier's Law Dictionary,” LH&RB, Newsletter of the Legal History & Rare Books Special Interest Section of the American Association of Law Libraries 6 (1996): 8–9; Field, David Dudley, et al., comps., The Code of Civil Procedure of the State of New York. Reported Complete by the Commissioners on Practice and Pleadings, ed. by Weber, Michael, (Union, N.J., 1998), Introduction.Google Scholar

²⁶ On the meaning of “creole” in its Louisiana context, see Tregle, Joseph G., Jr., “Early New Orleans Society: A Reappraisal,” Journal of Southern History 18 (1952): 21–36 and Tregle, Joseph G. Jr., “Creoles and Americans,” in Hirsch, Arnold R. and Logsdon, Joseph, eds., Creole New Orleans: Race and Americanization (Baton Rouge, 131–41).Google Scholar

²⁷ Livingston, Edward, “Autobiographical Jottings,” n. d., Edward Livingston Papers, Box 80, Department of Special Collections, Firestone Library, Princeton University; Hatcher, William B., Edward Livingston: Jeffersonian Republican and Jacksonian Democrat, (Baton Rouge: Louisiana State University Press, 1940), 1–10; Fernandez, , “A Herculean Task,” Chapter Six.Google Scholar

²⁸ Between 1812 and 1845, members of the court were designated “judges” rather than “justices,” and there was no formal recognition of a chief judge as such. However from the first session of court forward, it was the custom for the senior judge in point of commission or length of tenure to preside. The judiciary article in the Constitution of 1845 adopted the style “justice” and “chief justice.”Google Scholar

²⁹ Kilbourne, , A History of the Louisiana Civil Code, 96–130; Fernandez, , From Chaos to Continuity, Chapter Six; Concurrent Resolution of the General Assembly of Louisiana, 14 March 1822, Acts Passed at the Second Session of the Fifth Legislature of the State of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1822), 108.Google Scholar

³⁰ “An Act relative to the Criminal Laws of this State,” Acts Passed at the First Session of the Sixth Legislature of the State of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1821), 30–32; Concurrent Resolution of the General Assembly of Louisiana, 13 Feb. 1821, in Livingston, Edward, The Complete Works of Edward Livingston on Criminal Jurisprudence … (New York, 1873) 1:4; Billings, , “Origins of Criminal Law in Louisiana,” 66; Grant Lyons, “Narrow Failure, Wider Triumph? The Response to Edward Livingston's System of Criminal Law in Louisiana and Europe” (M.A. thesis, University of New Orleans, 1973); Preliminary Report on the Plan of a Penal Code, Works of Edward Livingston 1:7–79.Google Scholar

³¹ Livingston, Edward, “Draft of a Letter,” ca. 1823, Livingston Papers, Box 76.Google Scholar

³² Fernandez, , From Chaos to Continuity, Chapter Six; Kilbourne, A History of the Louisiana Civil Code, 115–28.Google Scholar

³³ Pothier, Robert Joseph, A Treatise on Obligations Considered from a Moral and Legal View, ed. By Warren M. Billings (Union, N.J, 1999), Introduction.Google Scholar

³⁴ This discussion relies on Kilbourne, , History of the Louisiana Civil Code, 131–65 and Fernandez, , From Chaos to Continuity, Chapter Six. Fernandez's discussion of the issues in Reynolds v. Swain is especially cogent, and it should be consulted for a detailed analysis of the issues and the constitutional stakes involved in the case.Google Scholar

³⁵ “An Act to organize the supreme court of the state of Louisiana, and to establish courts of inferior jurisdiction,” sections 17–18, Acts Passed at the Second Session of the First Legislature of the State of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1813), 28, 32.Google Scholar

³⁶ Boudreaux, Sybil A., ed., “The First Minute Book of the Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana, 1813 to 1818” (M.A. thesis, University of New Orleans, 1983), 13–15; Fernandez, Mark F., ed., “Rules of the Courts of the Territory of Orleans,” Louisiana History 36 (1995): 315–25; Billings, Warren M., ed., The Historic Rules of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1813–1879 (Lafayette, La., 1985), 6. The rules of procedure were also written into Wheelock S. Upton, comp., Code of Practice of Civil Cases for the State of Louisiana: With Annotations (New Orleans, 1839), 146–53.Google Scholar

³⁷ Schafer, Judith Kelleher, “Reform or Experiment? The Constitution of 1845,” in Billings and Haas, eds., In Search of Fundamental Law; Fernandez, Mark F., “From Chaos to Continuity: Early Reforms of the Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1845–1852,” Louisiana History 28 (1987): 19–41; Young, Sheridan E., “Louisiana's Court of Errors and Appeals, 1843–1846,” Louisiana History 32 (1992): 66–80; Billings, ed., Historic Rules, 20–21. Compare the Rules of 1846 with the modern regulations in West's Louisiana Statutes Annotated, Vol. 8, Court Rules (St. Paul, Minn., 1991), 293–582. A careful treatment of the evolution of the post-1846 rules remains to be undertaken.Google Scholar

³⁸ Billings, , ed., Historic Rules, 1, 4–5, 6, 9–11; Billings, Warren M., “The Supreme Court and the Education of Louisiana Lawyers,” Louisiana Bar Journal 33 (1985): 74–80; Billings, Warren M., “A Course of Studies: Books That Shaped Louisiana Law,” in Billings and Fernandez, eds., A Law Unto Itself?, 25–40.Google Scholar

³⁹ Hoffman, David, A Course of Legal Study, Addressed to Students and the Profession Generally (Baltimore, 1816); Billings, , ed., Historic Rules, 10–11. The court owned a copy of the second edition of the Course of Legal Studies (Baltimore, 1836), which now sits in the rare book collection of the Law Library of Louisiana in New Orleans.Google Scholar

⁴⁰ Acts Passed at the Second Session of the Fifteenth Legislature of the State of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1842), 516–18; Billings, , ed., Historic Rules, 30–31; “Rules of the Supreme Court Revised and Adopted May 30 1978,” Louisiana Reports 31 (1879): viii; 51 (1899): xxxvi; 134 (1914): xii-xiv; “Amendments to Rules, Supreme Court of the State of Louisiana,” 152 (1923): vii–viii.Google Scholar

⁴¹ Bonquois, Dora J., “The Career of Henry Adams Bullard,” Louisiana Historical Quarterly 22 (1940): 999–1106; Brasseaux, Carl A., “Henry Adams Bullard,” in Conrad et al., Dictionary of Louisiana Biography, 1: 127; Karachuk, Robert Feikema, “A Workman's Tools: The Law Library of Henry Adams Bullard,” (M.A. thesis. University of New Orleans, 1996).Google Scholar

⁴² Plasse, Rosemarie Davis, “Tools of the Profession: New Orleans Attorneys and Their Law Libraries from Statehood to Secession (1813–1861),” (M.A. thesis. University of New Orleans, 2000); Wallach, Kate, “The Publication of Legal Treatises in America from 1800 to 1830,” Law Library Journal, 45 (1942): 136–48; Pimsleur, Meira G., ed., Checklist of Basic American Legal Publications, (Hackensack, N.J., 1962); Silver, Rollo G., The American Printer, 1787–1825 (Charlottesville, 1967), 114–45; Friedman, Lawrence M., A History of American Law (New York, 1973), 282–92. A New Orleans attorney, Gustavus Schmidt attempted to found one such periodical. In 1841, he published the first volume the Louisiana Law Journal, but it seemingly failed for want of subscribers, which was a common fate for similar publications of the time. See Bloomfield, Maxwell, “Law vs. Politics: The Self-Image of the American Bar,” in Holt, Wythe, ed., Essays in Nineteenth Legal History (Westport, Conn, 1976), 309.Google Scholar

⁴³ Proceedings of the Louisiana Bar Association, 1898–1899 (New Orleans, 1899), 7–9; Chroust, Anton-Hermann, The Rise of the Legal Profession in America (Norman, OK, 1965), 2:129–73; Billings, Warren M., “A Bar for Louisiana: Origins of the Louisiana State Bar Association.” 41 Louisiana History, 389–402 (2001).Google Scholar

⁴⁴ Gaspard, , “The Rise of the Louisiana Bar,” note 15.Google Scholar

⁴⁵ Schafer, Judith Kelleher, Slavery, the Civil Law, and The Supreme Court of Louisiana (Baton Rouge, 1994); Johnson, Walter, Soul by Soul: Life Inside the Antebellum Slave Market (Cambridge, Mass., 2000); Schafer, Judith Kelleher, “‘Forever Free from the Bonds of Slavery’: Emancipation in New Orleans, 1855–1857,” in Billings and Fernandez, eds., A Law Unto Itself, 141–178; Pearson, Ellen Holmes, “Imperfect Equality: The Legal Status of Free People of Color in New Orleans, 1803–1860,” ibid., 191–211; Douglas, Jeannine, “Steamboats and Slaves: Issues of Liability in Louisiana, 1831–1861” (M.A. thesis. University of New Orleans, 1991); Rivet, Charles G., “Commercial Evolution in the Catahoula Basin, With Perspectives on Two Frontier Families” (M.A. thesis. University of New Orleans, 1997); Reinders, Robert C., End of an Era: New Orleans, 1850–1860 (Baton Rouge, 1964); Brady, Patricia, “New Orleans in the 1850s,” in Samuel, Wilson Jr., et al. eds., Queen of the South: New Orleans, 1853–1862, The Journal of Thomas K. Wharton (New Orleans, 1999), xx-xxvii.Google Scholar

⁴⁶ Ellis, T.C.W., “The Louisiana Bar, 1813–1913,” Louisiana Reports, 133 (1913): lxxix; Helis, Thomas W., “Of Generals and Jurists: The Judicial System of New Orleans Under Union Occupation, May 1862-April 1866,” Louisiana History 29 (1988): 143–62; Proceedings of the Louisiana Bar Association, 1898–1902, 18; Taylor, Joe Gray, Louisiana Reconstructed, 1863–1877 (Baton Rouge, 1974).Google Scholar

⁴⁷ Page, Kathryn, “A First-Born Child of Liberty: The Constitution of 1864,” in Billings and Haas, eds., In Search of Fundamental Law, 52–69; Vincent, Charles, “Black Constitution Makers: The Constitution of 1868,” ibid., 69–81; Labbé, Ronald M., “That the Reign of Robbery Will Never Return to Louisiana,” ibid., 81–93; Lanza, Michael, “Little More Than a Family Meeting: The Constitution of 1898,” ibid., 99–110.Google Scholar

⁴⁸ Ray, John, comp., Digest of the Statutes of the State of Louisiana, in Two Volumes (New Orleans, 1870); Ray, John, comp., Revised Civil Code of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1870); Constitution of 1868, articles 109 and 138.Google Scholar

⁴⁹ Kilbourne, Richard Holcombe Jr., Debt, Investment, Slaves: Credit Relations in East Feliciana Parish, Louisiana, 1825–1885, (Tuscaloosa, 1995); Enger, Allen, “Valid But Not Enforceable: Decrees Issued by the Supreme Court of Louisiana Involving Contracts for Slaves” (M.A. Thesis, University of New Orleans, 1996); Dart, Henry Plauché, “The History of the Supreme Court of Louisiana,” Louisiana Reports 133 (1913): liii.Google Scholar

⁵⁰ Gaston, Paul M., The New South Creed: A Study in Southern Mythmaking (New York, 1970)151–87; Tregle, , “Creoles and Americans,” 169–85; Proceedings of the Louisiana Bar Association, generally; and Gayarré, Charles E.A., “The New Orleans Bench and Bar in 1823,” in Schafer, Judith Kelleher and Billings, Warren M., eds., An Uncommon Experience: Law and Judicial Institutions in Louisiana, 1803–2003 (Lafayette, La., 1997), 643–56, esp. 656; Howe, William Wirt, “Roman and Civil Law in America,” Harvard Law Review 16 (1903): 342–58; Leovy, Henry J., “The Ante-bellum Bench and Bar,” Proceedings of the Louisiana Bar Association, 1899–1900 (New Orleans, 1900), 10–27; Ellis, T.C.W., “The Louisiana Bar, 1813–1913,” Louisiana Reports 133 (1913): xvi-lxxx; Hunt, Carleton, “Address of Mr. Carleton Hunt,” in Ceremonies Attending the Presentation of the Portrait of the Hon. E. John Ellis Deceased to the Supreme Court of Louisiana (New Orleans, 1914), 6–24; Billings, “A Bar For Louisiana, 391–393.”Google Scholar

⁵¹ Windell, Marie E., “Henry Plauché Dart,” in Conrad et al., eds., Dictionary of Louisiana Biography 1:211–12; Billings, “A Bar For Louisiana, 393–396.”Google Scholar

⁵² Dart, “Centennial History of the Supreme Court of Louisiana,” liii.Google Scholar

⁵³ Dart, , “The Place of the Civil Law in Louisiana,” Tulane Law Review 4 (1930): 163–77.Google Scholar

⁵⁴ Fenner was the son of Associate Justice Charles E. Fenner, who served on the court from 1880 to 1894 and who was instrumental in organizing Tulane, Conrad, Glenn R., “Charles Erasmus Fenner,” in Conrad et al., eds., Dictionary of Louisiana Biography 1: 298.Google Scholar

⁵⁵ Fenner, , “The Jurisprudence of the Supreme Court of Louisiana,” Louisiana Reports 133 (1913): lxi-lxvi.Google Scholar

⁵⁶ Ibid.Google Scholar

⁵⁷ Friedman, , History of American Law, 293–567; Louisiana Reports 245 (1963): 124–52.Google Scholar

⁵⁸ Ireland, Gordon, “Louisiana's Legal System Reappraised,” Tulane Law Review 11 (1936–37): 596.Google Scholar

⁵⁹ Greenburg, Leonard, “Must Louisiana Resign to the Common Law?” Tulane Law Review 11 (1936–37): 598–601; Daggett, Harriet Spiller, Dainow, Joseph, Paul Hébert, M., and McMahon, Henry George, “A Reappraisal Appraised: A Brief for the Civil Law of Louisiana,” ibid. 12 (1937–38): 12–41, esp. 41; note 19, above.Google Scholar