Article contents
A King Who Devours His People+: Jiang Zemin and the Falun Gong Crackdown: A Bibliography
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 February 2019
Extract
In July 1999, the government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) began an official crackdown against the qigong cultivation group known as Falun Gong. Intended to quickly contain and eliminate what the PRC considers an evil or heretical cult (xiejiao), the suppression has instead created the longest sustained and, since the Tiananmen Square protests of June 1989, most widely known human rights protest conducted in the PRC. The Falun Gong has received worldwide recognition and support while the crackdown continues to provoke harsh criticism against the PRC as new allegations of human rights violations arise.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © 2006 by the International Association of Law Libraries
References
1 Qigong (chee-gung) refers to the cultivation of qi energy in the human body through breathing exercises and meditation to promote health or cure illness. The regulation of qi is the basis of traditional Chinese medicine. Richard Madsen, Understanding Falun Gong, 99 Current History 243, 243–44 (2000).Google Scholar
2 The name Falun Gong means ‘Practice of the Wheel of the Law'. Falun Gong is also commonly known by its practitioners as Falun Dafa or ‘Great Method of the Wheel of Law'. Benjamin Penny, The Falun Gong, Buddhism, and “Buddhist qigong”, 29 Asian Stud. Rev. 35, 35 (2005). In this paper, I will use Falun Gong when referring to the group and Falun Dafa when referring to the practice.Google Scholar
3 Using the term “Falun Gong” to search the headlines of “Major Newspapers” in the Lexis-Nexis Academic database retrieves over 1,000 results.Google Scholar
4 During the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976) the PRC attempted to eradicate religion by closing all temples, mosques, monasteries, and all other venues for religious activity. See e.g. God and Caesar in China: Policy Implications of Church-State Relations (Jason Kindopp & Carol Lee Harmin eds., Brookings Institution Press 2004).Google Scholar
5 The PRC was quite taken with the idea of qigong as a specifically “Chinese science” and hoped its widespread practice might improve the overall health of the general population. David Ownby, A History for Falun Gong: Popular Religion and the Chinese State since the Ming Dynasty, 6 Nova Religio 223, 233–34 (2003).Google Scholar
6 Maria Hsia Chang, Falun Gong: The End of Days 3 (Yale U. Press 2004).Google Scholar
7 Li Hongzhi received the “Advancing Marginal Sciences Award” at the 1993 Oriental Health Expos in Beijing. Also in 1993, “The Foundation for Encouraging People to Fight with Criminals” which is connected to the police ministry, wrote a letter of support for Li Hongzhi to the CQSRA. Lu Yunfeng, Entrepreneurial Logics and the Evolution of Falun Gong, 44(2) J. for Sci. Stud. Religion 173, 175 (2005).Google Scholar
8 Chang, supra n. 6, at 3.Google Scholar
9 Benjamin Penny, The Life and Times of Li Hongzhi: Falun Gong and Religious Biography, 175 China Q. 643, 652 (1999).Google Scholar
10 The details of Li Hongzhi's early life and his qigong training vary dramatically, depending on the source of information. Compare, Research Office of the Ministry of Public Security, Li Hongzhi: The Man and His Deeds, 32(5) Chinese L. & Govt. 56–64 (1999)(a PRC biography), with, Brief Biography of Li Hongzhi, 32(6) Chinese L. & Govt. 14–23 (1999)(issued by the Falun Gong).Google Scholar
11 James Tong, An Organizational Analysis of the Falun Gong: Structure, Communications, Financing, 171 China Q. 636, 640 (2002).Google Scholar
12 Li Hongzhi, Zhuan Falun 8 (Third Translation ed., Universe Publg. Co. 2000) (available at http://www.falundafa.org/eng/books.htm) (last updated 08/04/03).Google Scholar
13 Id. at 1.Google Scholar
14 Id. at 48; Jonathan S. Landreth & J.S. Greenburg, The Way We Live Now: Questions for Li Hongzhi; Eye of the Storm, N. Y. Times Mag. 19 (Aug. 8, 1999).Google Scholar
15 There are five official religions recognized by the PRC: Daoism, Buddhism, Islam, Protestantism, and Catholicism. God and Caesar in China, supra n. 4, at 2.Google Scholar
16 Chang, supra n. 6, at 5.Google Scholar
17 Id. at 6.Google Scholar
18 Tong, supra n. 11, at 636.Google Scholar
19 Beatrice Leung, China and Falun Gong: Party and society relations in the modern era, 11 J. Contemporary China 761, 765 (2002); Tong, supra n. 11, at 642–46.Google Scholar
20 Leung, supra n. 19, at 765.Google Scholar
21 Id.; Tong, supra n. 11, at 646–50.Google Scholar
22 Tong, supra n. 11, at 640.Google Scholar
23 In addition to the Falun Gong, several other qigong groups fell under similar surveillance and suppression by the PRC including Guo Gong (Nation Gong), Cibei Gong (Compassion Gong), and Zhong Gong (China Gong). Amnesty International, The People's Republic of China: The crackdown on Falun Gong and other so-called “heretical organizations. “ 13–16 (Mar. 23, 2000)[hereinafter Crackdown]; The PRC levied fines of over 8 million yuan on a qigong organization in Suzhou and prohibited the use of qigong for healing. Tong, supra n. 11, at 640Google Scholar
24 Chang, supra n. 6, at 6.Google Scholar
25 Tong, supra n. 11, at 640.Google Scholar
26 Id. at 641.Google Scholar
27 Id.Google Scholar
28 Id.Google Scholar
29 He Zuoxiu, I Do Not Approve of Teenagers Practicing Qigong, 32 Chinese L. & Govt. 95, 97 (1999).Google Scholar
30 Chang, supra n. 6, at 8.Google Scholar
31 Some sources place the number of demonstrators as over 20,000. Zong Hairen, Handling the Falungong Case, 35(1) Chinese L. & Govt. 53 (2002) (trans. from the Chinese text Zhu Rongji zai 1999).Google Scholar
32 Id. at 59.Google Scholar
33 Id. at 54.Google Scholar
34 Id. at 55.Google Scholar
35 Id. at 58.Google Scholar
36 James Tong, Anatomy of Regime Repression in China: Timing, enforcement institutions, and target selection in banning the Falungong, July 1999, 42 Asian Survey 795, 795 (2002) (citing an article in Renmin Ribao [People's Daily,] Aug. 5, 1999).Google Scholar
37 Id. at 799.Google Scholar
38 Id.Google Scholar
39 Chang, supra n. 6, at 9.Google Scholar
40 Tong, supra n. 36, at 804.Google Scholar
41 Id. at 814.Google Scholar
42 Id. at 815.Google Scholar
43 Two Documents Concerning the Banning of the Research Society of Falun Dafa: Notice of the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China, 32(5) Chinese L. & Govt. 31–32 (1999).Google Scholar
44 Randall Peerenboom, China's Long March Toward Rule of Law 92 (Cambridge U. Press 2002).Google Scholar
45 Nancy Chen, Healing Sects and Anti-Cult Campaigns, 174 China Q. 505, 515–16 (2003).Google Scholar
46 Mickey Speigel, Dangerous Meditation: China's Campaign Against Falungong 113 (Human Rights Watch 2002) (citing Michael Laris, Beijing Turns the Internet Against It's Enemies; Sect Members Abroad Claim State Harassment, Washington Post A01, August 4, 1999).Google Scholar
47 Regarding the Wanted Order Issuedfor the Suspect Li Hongzhi: The Spokesman for the Ministry of Public Security Holds a Press Conference, 32(5) Chinese L. & Govt. 35 (1999) (reprinting Xinhua News Agency dispatch from July 29, 1999).Google Scholar
48 Circular from the Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party on Forbidding Communist Party Members from Practicing Falun Dafa, 32(5) Chinese L. & Govt. 14 (1999); Ministry of Personnel issues notice stipulating that state functionaries may not practice Falun Dafa, 32(5) Chinese L. & Govt. 26 (1999)(reprinting Xinhua News Agency dispatch from July 23, 1999).Google Scholar
49 Wanted Order Issued by the Ministry of Public Security of the People's Republic of China, 32(5) Chinese L. & Govt. 33 (1999) (reprinting Xinhua News Agency dispatch from July 29, 1999).Google Scholar
50 $6,000 equals about 50,000 yuan, equivalent to six years salary of the average Chinese urban worker. Chang, supra n. 6, at 10; Beijing Posts Reward for Arrest of Li Hongzhi, 32(5) Chinese L. & Govt. 37 (1999).Google Scholar
51 Notice on Various Issues Regarding Identifying and Banning of Cultic Organizations, 36(2) Chinese L. & Govt. 22 (2003); Notice on Intensive Strikes Against Activities of Various Cultic Organizations, 36(2) Chinese L. & Govt. 101 (2003); Legislative Resolution on Banning Heretical Cults, 36(3) Chinese L. & Govt. 85 (2003); Judicial Explanations on Crimes by Cults, 36(3) Chinese L. & Govt. 87 (2003).Google Scholar
52 Tong, supra n. 36, at 815.Google Scholar
53 Crackdown, supra n. 23, at 22. See also Amnesty International, People's Republic of China: Falun Gong practitioners: lists of sentences, administrative sentences, and those detained, (Mar. 29, 2000).Google Scholar
54 Re-education through labor (RETL) is a form of administrative detention conducted outside the formal criminal justice system and is designed to rehabilitate the behavior of societal “agitators” through moral and cultural education. Robert Bejesky, Falun Gong & Re-Education Through Labor: Traditional rehabilitation for the “misdirected” to protect societal stability within China's evolving criminal justice system, 17 Colum. J. Asian L. 147, 148 (2004).Google Scholar
55 Chang, supra n. 6, at 13; See also Tong, supra n. 36, at 816.Google Scholar
56 Chang, supra n. 6, at 25.Google Scholar
57 U.S. Dept. State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor, Country Reports on Human Rights Practices 2005: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) § 1(c) (May 8, 2006) (available at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61605.htm).Google Scholar
58 Chang, supra n. 6, at 25.Google Scholar
59 Robin Munro, Dangerous Minds: Political Psychiatry in China Today and its Origins in the Mao Era 158–76 (Human Rights Watch 2002).Google Scholar
60 David Matas & David Kilgour, Report into Allegations of Organ Harvesting of Falun Gong Practitioners in China (July 6, 2006) (available at http://OrganHarvestInvestigation.net).Google Scholar
61 Xinhua News Agency, Reports on harvesting Falun Gong practitioners organs groundless: official, http://news3.xinhuanet.com/english/2006-07/28/content_4888428.htm (updated July 28, 2006).Google Scholar
62 Gao Zhisheng issued three open letters to the PRC on Dec. 31, 2004, October 18, 2005, and December 12, 2005. English translations of these letters are available at The Epoch Times, Gao Zhisheng, http://www.theepochtimes.com/211, 107“ 1.html (accessed Nov. 21, 2006).Google Scholar
63 Joseph Kahn, Legal Gadfly Bites Hard, and Beijing Slaps Him, N. Y. Times Al (Dec. 13, 2005).Google Scholar
64 Jonathan Watts, China activists vanish amid protests; Security police may be holding hunger strikers, Guardian (London) § (International) 17 (Feb. 25, 2006).Google Scholar
65 Joseph Kahn, Chinese Crackdown on Rights Lawyers Signals Effort to Deter Increasing Legal Challenges, N. Y. Times A7 (Aug. 19, 2006).Google Scholar
66 Robin Fields, China Charges Activist with Subversion, L. A. Times A8 (Oct. 14, 2006)Google Scholar
67 H.R. Subcomm. on Africa, Global Human Rights, & Intl. Operations, Falun Gong and China's Continuing War on Human Rights, 109th Cong. 34 (July 21, 2005)(statement of Yonglin Chen, former Consul for Political Affairs, Chinese Consulate, Sydney, Australia).Google Scholar
68 Cong.-Exec. Comm. China, Annual Report 2006, 109th Cong. 95 (Sept. 20, 2006) (citing various news agency reports of arrests).Google Scholar
69 The PRC confiscated 169 million illegal publications in 2005, including 4.6 million Falun Gong and other evil cult organization propaganda materials. Cong.-Exec. Comm. China, People's Daily Publishes 2005 Censorship Numbers, http://www.cecc.gov/pages/virtualAcad/index.phpd?showsingle=46660 (Nov. 6, 2006).Google Scholar
70 U.S. Dept. State, supra n. 57, at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/hrrpt/2005/61605.htm.Google Scholar
71 U.S. Dept. State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor, International Religious Freedom Report 2006: China (includes Tibet, Hong Kong, and Macau) § II. Restrictions on Religious Freedom (Sept. 15, 2006) (available at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71338.htm).Google Scholar
73 U.S. Dept. State, Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, & Labor, International Religious Freedom Report 2006: China (includes Taiwan only) § I. Religious Demography (Sept. 15, 2006) (available at http://www.state.gov/g/drl/rls/irf/2006/71337.htm).Google Scholar
74 Mark R. Bell & Taylor C. Boas, Falun Gong and the Internet: Evangelism, Community, and Struggle for Survival, 6 Nova Religio 277, 278–79 (2003).Google Scholar
75 Thomas Lum, CRS Report for Congress: China and Falun Gong 8, (May 25, 2006).Google Scholar
76 Justice for Falun Gong, Legal Actions, http://flgjustice.org (updated Nov. 23, 2006, 23:42).Google Scholar
77 Plaintiffs A, B, C, D, E, F v. Jiang Zemin, 282 F. Supp.2d 875 (N.D. Ill. 2003), aff'd, Ye v. Jiang Zemin, 383 F. 3d 620 (7th Cir. 2004), cert. denied, 544 U.S. 975 (2005).Google Scholar
78 Doe I v. Liu Qi, 349 F. Supp 2d 1258 (N.D. Cal. 2004).Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by