Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T11:04:48.445Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice. Edited by Mark Dawson, Bruno De Witte, and Elise Muir. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2013. Pp. viii, 292. ISBN 9780857939395. UK $83.00; US $130.00.

Review products

Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice. Edited by Mark Dawson, Bruno De Witte, and Elise Muir. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar, 2013. Pp. viii, 292. ISBN 9780857939395. UK $83.00; US $130.00.

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2019

Herb Somers*
Affiliation:
The Jacob Burns Law Library, The George Washington Unversity Law School, Washington, D.C. USA

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Book Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © 2015 by the International Association of Law Libraries. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

7 Case C26/62, NV Algemene Transp. en Expeditie Onderneming van Gend & Loos v. Neth. Inland Revenue Admin., 1963 E.C.R. 1.Google Scholar

8 Case C6/64, Flaminio Costa v. ENEL, 1964 E.C.R. 585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

9 G. Federico Mancini & David T. Keeling, Democracy and the European Court of Justice, 57 Mod. L. Rev. 175, 183 (1994).Google Scholar

10 Karen j. Alter & Laurence R. Helfer, Nature or Nurture? Judicial Lawmaking in the European Court of Justice and the Andean Tribunal of Justice, 64 Int'l Org. 563, 564 (2010).Google Scholar

11 Elise Muir, Mark Dawson & Bruno de Witte, Introduction: the European Court of Justice as Political Actor, in Judicial Activism at the Auropean Court of Justice 1, 2 (Mark Dawson et al. eds., 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

12 Case C-85/96, Maria Martinez Sala v. Freistaat Bayern, 1998 E.C.R. I-2691; Case C-184/99, Grzelczyk v. Ctr. Pub. d'aide Sociale d'Ottignies-Louvain-la-Neuve, 2001 E.C.R. I-6193; Case C-413/99, Baumbast v. Sec'y of State for the Home Dep't, 2002 E.C.R. I-7091.Google Scholar

13 Black's Law Dictionary 974 (10th ed. 2014).Google Scholar

14 Mark Tushnet, The United States of America, in Judicial Activism in Common Law Supreme Courts 415, 417 (Bruce Dickson ed., 2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

15 Case C-438/05, Int'l Transp. Workers’ Fed'n and Finnish Seamen's Union v. Viking Line ABP and OÜ Viking Line Eesti, 2007 E.C.R. 1–10779.Google Scholar

16 Jacobellis v. Ohio, 378 U.S. 184, 197 (1964) (Stewart, J., concurring)Google Scholar

17 Mark Dawson, The Political Face of Judicial Activism: Europe's Law-politics Imbalance, in Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice 11, 23 (Mark Dawson et al. eds., 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

18 Case C-269/90, Technische Universität München v Hauptzollamt München-Mitte, 1991 E.C.R. 1–5469.Google Scholar

19 Case T-13/99 Pfizer Animal Health S.A. v. Council of the European Union, 2002 E.C.R. 11–03305.Google Scholar

20 Ellen Vos, The European Court of Justice in the Face of Scientific Uncertainty and Complexity, in Judicial Activism at the European Court of Justice 142, 166 (Mark Dawson et al. eds., 2013).Google Scholar