Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gbm5v Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T16:50:29.170Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Photocopying In Australian Libraries Developments In Copyright Law

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2019

Extract

Problems of copyright infringement involved in the extensive and largely uncontrolled use of coin operated photocopying machines in libraries, particularly University libraries, have become the most acute in Australian copyright law at the present time. These problems are not of course unique to Australia, but the recent decision of the High Court in University of New South Wales v Moorhouse and Angus & Robertson (Publishers) Pty Ltd has created a serious and difficult situation for libraries for which a workable solution has not yet been found. In 1974 the Australian government appointed a Committee, known as the Franki Committee, to examine the question of the reprographic reproduction of copyright works in Australia and to recommend any alterations to the copyright law and any other measures considered necessary to effect a proper balance of interest between owners and users of copyright materials in respect of reprographic reproduction. The Committee has not yet made its report and it is not known whether any recommendations will be made which will assist libraries in arriving at a solution to the legal problems now facing them where selfservice coin operated photocopying machines are made available for use by readers.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © International Association of Law Libraries 1976 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 (1975) 6 ALR 193.Google Scholar

2 Copyright Act 1968-1973, ss. 13 (1), 14 (1) (a), 31 (1) (a) (i) and 40.Google Scholar

3 6 ALR 193, per Gibbs J at pp. 202–4, per Jacobs J (with whom McTiernan ACJ agreed) at pp. 209–10.Google Scholar

4 Per Gibbs J at p. 202.Google Scholar

5 At pp. 201, 202.Google Scholar

6 At p. 203.Google Scholar

7 At pp. 199200.Google Scholar