No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Law Publishing and Legal Scholarship in the United Kingdom
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 February 2019
Extract
This paper is essentially an abridged version of the Final Report of the Society of Public Teacher's of Law (S.P.T.L.) Working Party on Law Publishing, presented in August 1977. The Working Party was established in May 1974 with the following terms of reference, “To investigate the problems of law publishing as they bear on legal scholarship and legal research and to make recommendations”, and its aim was to represent the interests of teachers, students, researchers and authors concerned with all levels of academic law in the British Isles. Although our findings are not specifically related to the task of the law librarian I hope that members of the International Association of Law Libraries will be interested in this view of law publishing from the perspective of the legal academic profession. It should be made clear that this study was not conceived of as a project of pure academic research into the British law book trade, rather, as the tenor of the paper will reveal, its purpose was to stimulate a greater awareness of the problems facing publishers, authors and educators and to define some possible strategies for the different groups concerned. The Working Party has therefore seen its role as twofold. Its first function was to investigate and analyse the current situation in law publishing in the light of the problem created by inflation. It was felt that rising costs and prices were likely to have a serious effect on publication of some important types of scholary and educational material which were not immediately commercially attractive and also on levels of provision of books and other material in libraries and for students generally. Information was sought by questionnaire, correspondence and interview from different groups involved in the production and consumption of academic legal literature (publishers, periodical editors, librarians and lecturers) and from other bodies and individuals concerned with the general problems of academic publishing. In the course of our investigations it became apparent that the Working Party could perform a number of useful functions beyond that of pure research. In the final year of its existence it has, therefore, adopted a slightly more active policy. It has seen its second function as that of stimulating activity on the problems themselves, through advice to the academic legal community on the publication of their work, through encouragement of further research projects in specific areas and through discussion with publishers, editors and others involved in the production of legal material. Its advisory role is reflected in the series of separate working papers on aspects of law publishing and production of materials.
- Type
- Articles
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © International Association of Law Libraries 1977
References
1 The Working Party was supported by a grant under the Nuffield FoundationGoogle Scholar
Social Sciences Small Grants Scheme. Its’ membership was as follows:Google Scholar
Professor William Twining (Chairman), Warwick University;Google Scholar
Professor John Rear (Secretary and Treasurer), Brunei University;Google Scholar
Dr. Peter Mann, Sheffield University;Google Scholar
Mr. Don Daintree (representing the British and Irish Association of Law Librarians), Trent Polytechnic;Google Scholar
Mr. John Tillotson (representing the Association of Law Teachers), Sheffield Polytechnic;Google Scholar
Mrs. Jennifer Uglow (Research Associate).Google Scholar
Reports and Working Papers produced in this study are available from Mrs. J. Uglow, 98 Whitstable Road, Canterbury, Kent, England.Google Scholar
2 These included proposals for a general enquiry into the problems of academic publishing at a national level, a detailed research project on the information needs of law teachers and students and a study of the problems of developing local legal literature in small jurisdictions. This last project is now in progress, sponsored by the International Legal Center, New York, under the direction of Professor William Twining.Google Scholar
3 First Interim Report of the S.P.T.L. Working Party on Law Publishing, para. 6.Google Scholar
4 Ibid., para. 9.Google Scholar
5 Ibid., para. 15.Google Scholar
6 Library Association Record, 78 (2), February 1976.Google Scholar
7 The problems of legal periodicals are dealt with in detail in Working Paper 2. Law Journals.Google Scholar
8 The principal law publishers in the United Kingdom are Sweet and Maxwell Ltd. and Butterworth Law Publishers Ltd. However Working Paper 1, Marketing your Manuscript, list an additional twenty-one companies who express an interest in carrying legal material.Google Scholar
9 First Interim Report, para. 16.Google Scholar
10 Library Association Record, 79 (2) February 1977 and 79 (6) July 1977.Google Scholar
11 Wilson, J. F. and Marsh, S. B., “Second Survey of Legal Education in the United Kingdom”, Journal of the Society of Public Teachers of Law, XIII (4), July 1975.Google Scholar
12 The Law Librarian, 7 (3), December 1976.Google Scholar
13 Report of the Whitford Committee on Copyright and Designs Law, Cmnd. 6732, March 1977. (London), H.M.S.O.Google Scholar