1 Tocqueville, Alexis de. On the Penetentiary System in the U.S., and its Application in France. Carbondale, Illinois: Southern Illinois University Press (1964).Google Scholar

2 Tocqueville, Alexis de. Democracy in America. New Rochelle, New York: Arlington House (1966).Google Scholar

3 E. g., Bloomfield, B. C. (ed.) Acquisition and Provision of Foreign Books by National University Libraries in the United Kingdom. London: Mansell, 1972; Figueredo, Fernando J., “Acquisition of Latin American Legal Materials: A Burdensome Task”, 64 Law Library Journal 46–51 (971); Schwerin, Kurt, “Foreign Law Selection and Acquisition: Sources and Problems”, 63 Law Library Journal 70–91 (1970); “Panel on Foreign Law”, 55 Law Library Journal 311–424 (1962); “Foreign and International Law Materials. A Panel”, 53 Law Library Journal 372–391 (1960).Google Scholar

4 Clarke, D. A. (ed.) Acquisitions from the Third World (Papers of the Ligue de bibliotheques europeenes de recherche seminar 17–19 September 1973). London: Mansell, 1975.Google Scholar

5 See, e.g., Hakli, “The Scandia Plan” in Clarke, supra at 211–222; Oertel, “The Cooperative acquisition programme of German Libraries” in Clarke, supra at 223–227.Google Scholar

6 See, e. g., McNiff, “The Farmington Plan and the foreign acquisitions programmes of American research libraries” in Clarke, supra 4 at 145–158. McNiff describes the goal of the Farmington Plan: “Its objective is to make sure that at least one copy of each new foreign book and pamphlet that might reasonably be expected to interest a research worker in the United States will be acquired by an American library, promptly listed in the Union Catalog at the Library of Congress, and made available by inter-library loan or photographic reproduction.”Google Scholar

7 See, e.g., UNESCO. Statistical Yearbook 1971. Paris: UNESCO, 1972 Tables. (The figures are for 1970.)Google Scholar

8 The figures which are given for the “Third World” share of world book production are estimates derived by various commentators from various sources. One needs first to examine the UNESCO Statistical Yearbooks for various years to arrive at statistics. While figures are given for some countries, none are available for others. “The complete inadequacy of such an official source, itself a testimony to the shortcomings of the various national sources from which it is derived, compels the use of other varied sources of information in an effort to derive some statistical picture.” Naylor, “A comprehensive loan collection of Latin American Material” in Clarke, supra note 4, at 126. The estimate for Southeast Asia is furnished by Rogers, “Cooperative acquisitions from the Third World: a discussion” in Clarke, supra note 4 at 193.Google Scholar

9 See generally, note 8 supra. Zell, “Publishing in Africa in the seventies: problems and prospects” in Clarke, supra note 4 at 105.Google Scholar

10 See generally, note 8 supra. Hopwood, “Book acquisition from the Middle East” in Clarke, supra note 4 at 84.Google Scholar

11 See generally, note 8 supra. Naylor, “A comprehensive loan collection of Latin American Material” in Clarke, supra note 4 at 129. “There is no single set of figures to which one can turn in order to receive a fully reliable account or even a reasonable estimate of material published in Latin America.Google Scholar

12 See, e. g., statement by Naylor supra at 125. “The single country which publishes the most material of research interest for the study of Latin America lies outside the region. It is, of course, the United States of America.”Google Scholar

13 See, Kohl, “Acquisitions problems of Africa south of the Sahara” in Clarke, supra note 4, 85–103.Google Scholar

14 See description by Rogers, “South Asia: book production, bibliographical control and acquisition problems” in Clarke, supra note 4, 1–50 for description of the problem in one “Third World” region.Google Scholar

15 See description of Latin American efforts by Naylor, in Clarke, supra note 4 at 125.Google Scholar

16 Naylor, supra at 131–132: Figueredo, supra note 3 at 47–48.Google Scholar

17 See, Figueredo, supra at 47; but see, Zell, supra, note 9 at 119–120 for description of African Books in Print.Google Scholar

18 See Hopwood, supra, note 10 at 79; Kohl, supra, note 13 at 87. “In countries formerly under British control the situation is better than in former French territories.”Google Scholar

19 “New Directions for Law Libraries: Alternatives for the Future”, 64 Law Library Journal 507–521 (1971).Google Scholar

20 Id. at 507.Google Scholar

21 Id.Google Scholar

22 “Zero-Growth: When is NOT-Enough Enough? A Symposium”, 1 Journal of Academic Librarianship 4–15 (1975) at 4.Google Scholar

23 Note 20, supra.Google Scholar

24 Note 22, supra; see, “Current Comments – Committee Recommend Important Changes for Harvard Law Library” 58 Law Library Journal297 (1965). In 1965 the space conditions at the Harvard Law Library had grown to such proportions as to warrant study by the law school committee in planning. Dominant in the proposals was the distinction between “dead” and “live” materials. The collection was then growing at 23,000 volumes per year, requiring roughly 800 three-foot shelves each year. It was estimated that at that growth rate, the one million volume collection in 1962 would double in size in forty-five years. It is now clear that the collection will probably double in size in approximately half that time.Google Scholar

25 Note 19, supra at 518.Google Scholar

26 Note 22, supra at 5.Google Scholar

27 Trueswell, R. W., Analysis of Library User Circulation Requirements, Final Report (January 1968), National Science Foundation GNO 435; see also, Trueswell in Symposium, supra note 22 at 6–7.Google Scholar

28 Buckland, Michael. Book Availability and the Library User. New York: Pergamon, 1975.Google Scholar

29 For general discussion, see, Gore, Daniel (ed.) Farewell to Alexandria: Solutions to Space, Growth and Performance Problems of Libraries. New York: Greenwood Press, 1976.Google Scholar

30 Note 22, supra, at 5.Google Scholar

31 Note 19, supra, at 512–513.Google Scholar

32 Note 22, supra, at 5.Google Scholar

33 See generally, note 22 and note 29.Google Scholar

34 Note 22, supra, at 5.Google Scholar

35 Note 22, supra, at 7.Google Scholar

36 Ibid.Google Scholar

37 Ibid.Google Scholar

38 Ibid.Google Scholar

39 Note 22, supra, at 5.Google Scholar

40 Note 22, supra, at 7.Google Scholar