Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T12:51:11.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why did they not take on the disputes? Law, power and politics in the decision-making of Chinese courts*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 November 2007

Xin He
Xin He*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, City University of Hong Kong
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Chinese courts’ recent refusal to take on some disputes raises questions on the extent to which they are controlled by superior political powers in their region. Through a close examination of the handling process of ‘Married Out Women’ disputes, this article shows that lower courts in Guangdong Province, China, have effectively resisted pressure to solve the disputes. Arguing legal barriers and enforcement difficulties, the courts ultimately referred the disputes to the governments but agreed to review the governments’ decisions in administrative litigation. In so doing, the courts retain an advantageous position in the power relationship with the governments. The article argues that Chinese courts are capable of deliberating about and transforming their situation by strategically interpreting the law and negotiating with superior powers. It suggests that judicial independence in China is far more complicated than is often recognised, and that judicial behaviour cannot be adequately explained without thick descriptions and understanding of the legal arguments, resource constraints and strategic interpretations open to the courts, in context.

Type
Research Article
Information
International Journal of Law in Context , Volume 3 , Issue 3 , September 2007 , pp. 203 - 225
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Chan, Kam Wing (1994) Cities with Invisible Walls. Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, Tiejun and Selden, Mark (1994) ‘The Origins and Social Consequences of China’s Hukou System’, China Quarterly 139: 664–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Felstiner, William et al. (1980–81) ‘The Emergence and Transformation of Disputes: Naming, Blaming, Claiming’, Law and Society Review 15: 631–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finder, Susan (1989) ‘Like Throwing an Egg against a Stone: Administrative Litigation in the People’s Republic of China’, Journal of Chinese Law, 3: 1–28.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
He, Xin (2004) ‘Ideology or Reality? Limited Judicial Independence in Contemporary China’, Australian Journal of Asian Law 6: 213–30.Google Scholar
He, Xin (2005a) ‘Administrative Law as a Political Control Mechanism in Contemporary China’, Paper presented at the conference ‘Constitutionalism and Judicial Power in China’ organised by CERI and Sciences Po inParis,12–13 December 2005.Google Scholar
He, Xin (2005b) ‘Why Do They not Comply with the Law? Illegality and Semi-legality among Rural-urban Migrant Entrepreneurs in Beijing’, Law and Society Review 39: 527–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, Xin (2007) ‘Recent Decline of China’s Economic Caseloads: Exploration of a Surprising Phenomenon’ China Quarterly 190: 352–74.Google Scholar
He, Weifang (1997) ‘Zhongguo sifa zhidu de liangge wenti’ [‘Two Problems of Chinese Judicial System’], Zhongguo shehui kexue [Social Science in China] 6: 117–30.Google Scholar
Helmke, Gretchen (2005) Courts under Constraints: Judges, Generals, and Presidents in Argentina. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, Kenneth M. (ed.) (1991) Judicial Activism in Comparative Perspective. New York: St Martin’s.Google Scholar
Hou, Meng (2003) ‘Sifa gaige beijing xia de zhengfa zhili fangshi: jiceng zhengfa weiyuanhui zhidu ge’an yanjiu’ [‘The Political-Legal Governance in the Background of Judicial Reform: A Case Study of Political-Legal Committees on Grassroots Level’], Huadong zhengfa xueyuan xuebao [Journal of East China University of Political Science and Law] 5: 99–106.Google Scholar
Hung, Vernon (2005) ‘Judicial Reform in China: Lessons from Shanghai’, Carnegie Papers Series.Google Scholar
Fu, Hualing (2003) ‘Putting China’s Judiciary into Perspective: Is It Independent, Competent, and Fair?’, in Jenson, Erik and Heller, Thomas (eds.), Beyond Common Knowledge. Stanford: Stanford University Press, pp. 193–219.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford (1983) Local Knowledge. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Gillman, Howard (1994) ‘On Constructing a Science of Comparative Judicial Politics: Tate and Haynie’s ‘Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts’, Law and Society Review 28: 355–76.Google Scholar
Jiang, Shigong (2003) ‘Falu bu ru zi di de minshi tiaojie’ [‘Civil Mediation in a Lawless World’], in S. Jiang, Fazhi yu zhili [Legal System and Governance]. Beijing: China’s University of Political Science and Law Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Thomas M. (2004) The Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubman, Stanley B. (1999) Bird in a Cage. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally (1990) Getting Justice and Getting Even. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Merry, Sally (2006) Human Rights and Gender Violence: Translating International Law into Local Justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moustafa, Tamir (2003) ‘Law versus the State: The Judicialization of Politics in Egypt’, Law and Social Inquiry 28: 883–930.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’brien, Kevin J. and Li, Lianjiang (2005) ‘Suing the Local State: Administrative Litigation in Rural China’, in Diamant, N. et al. (eds.), Engaging the Law in China: State, Society and Possibilities for Justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall (2002) China’s Long March Toward Rule of Law. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall (2006) ‘Judicial Independence and Judicial Accountability: An Empirical Study of Individual Case Supervision’, China Journal 67–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pei, Minxin (1997) ‘Citizens v. Mandarins: Administrative Litigation in China’, China Quarterly, 152: 832–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Rogers M. (1992) ‘If Politics Matters: Implications for a “New Institutionalism”’, Studies in American Political Development 6: 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smithey, Shannon I. and Ishiyama, John (2002) ‘Judicial Activism in Post-Communists Politics’, Law and Society Review 36: 719–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solinger, Dorothy J. (1999) Contesting Citizenship in Urban China: Peasant Migrants, the State, and the Logic of the Market. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Suli, (2000) Songfa xia xiang [Bring the Law to the Countryside]. Beijing: China’s University of Political Science and Law Press.Google Scholar
Suli, (2006) ‘Zhongguo sifa zhong de zhengdang’ [‘The Political Parties in China’s Judiciary’], Fafu yu shehui kexue [Law and Social Sciences] 1: 256–84.Google Scholar
Sun, Hailong et al. (2004) ‘Chengshi hua beijing xia nongchun waijianu quanyi jiufeng jiqi jiejue jizhi de sikao’ [‘An Meditation on Rural “MOW” Disputes and Their Resolution Mechanism In the Background of Urbanization’], Falu shiyong [Legal Application] 3: 26–30.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal (1995) ‘Why the Expansion of Judicial Power?’, in Tate, N. and Valinder, T. (eds.), The Global Expansion of Judicial Power. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Tate, C. Neal and Haynie, Stacia (1993) ‘Authoritarianism and the Functions of Courts: A Time Series Analysis of the Philippine Supreme Court, 1961–1987’, Law and Society Review 27: 707–40.Google Scholar
Toharia, J. Jose (1975) ‘Judicial Independence in an Authoritarian Regime: The Case of Contemporary Spain’, Law and Society Review 9: 475–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Upham, Frank K. (2005) ‘Who Will Find the Defendant if He Stay with His Ship? Justice in Rural China’, Yale Law Journal 114: 1675–718.Google Scholar
Wang, Fei-Ling (2005) Organizing through Division and Exclusion: China’s Hukou System. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Zhang, Yongbo (2006) ‘Nongchun “waijianu” wengti de sifa yanjiu’ [‘Judicial Research on Rural “MOW”’], Panyu District Court edn., Yushan fatan [Yushan Law Forum], p. 2.Google Scholar